Development of Prediction Models for Sick Leave Due to Musculoskeletal Disorders.
Absenteeism
Musculoskeletal disease
Prediction models
Prognostic research
Risk assessment
Journal
Journal of occupational rehabilitation
ISSN: 1573-3688
Titre abrégé: J Occup Rehabil
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 9202814
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
09 2019
09 2019
Historique:
pubmed:
5
1
2019
medline:
20
8
2020
entrez:
5
1
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Purpose The aim of this study was to develop prediction models to determine the risk of sick leave due to musculoskeletal disorders (MSD) in non-sick listed employees and to compare models for short-term (i.e., 3 months) and long-term (i.e., 12 months) predictions. Methods Cohort study including 49,158 Dutch employees who participated in occupational health checks between 2009 and 2015 and sick leave data recorded during 12 months follow-up. Prediction models for MSD sick leave within 3 and 12 months after the health check were developed with logistic regression analysis using routinely assessed health check variables. The performance of the prediction models was evaluated with explained variance (Nagelkerke's R-square), calibration (Hosmer-Lemeshow test) and discrimination (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, AUC) measures. Results A total of 376 (0.8%) and 1193 (2.4%) employees had MSD sick leave within 3 and 12 months after the health check. The prediction models included similar predictor variables (educational level, musculoskeletal complaints, distress, supervisor social support, work-home interference, intrinsic motivation, development opportunities, and work pace). The explained variances were 7.6% and 8.8% for the model with 3 and 12 months follow-up, respectively. Both prediction models showed adequate calibration and discriminated between employees with and without MSD sick leave 3 months (AUC = 0.761; Interquartile range [IQR] 0.759-0.763) and 12 months (AUC = 0.740; IQR 0.738-0.741) after the health check. Conclusion The prediction models could be used to determine the risk of MSD sick leave in non-sick listed employees and invite them to preventive consultations with occupational health providers.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30607694
doi: 10.1007/s10926-018-09825-y
pii: 10.1007/s10926-018-09825-y
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
617-624Références
Stat Med. 2002 Dec 30;21(24):3803-22
pubmed: 12483768
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2004 Feb;30(1):56-63
pubmed: 15018029
Occup Environ Med. 2004 May;61(5):398-404
pubmed: 15090659
Occup Med (Lond). 2005 Aug;55(5):375-9
pubmed: 15827077
Stat Med. 2005 Sep 30;24(18):2867-72
pubmed: 16134131
Am J Ind Med. 2006 Mar;49(3):204-14
pubmed: 16470545
BMC Psychiatry. 2006 Aug 22;6:34
pubmed: 16925825
Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2007 Aug;80(8):733-41
pubmed: 17410376
J Occup Rehabil. 2007 Sep;17(3):409-21
pubmed: 17636456
Eur Spine J. 2008 Sep;17(9):1185-92
pubmed: 18649089
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2009 Jul 28;9:57
pubmed: 19638200
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010 Jun 1;35(13):1307-15
pubmed: 20461038
BMC Fam Pract. 2010 Jul 20;11:53
pubmed: 20646286
Disabil Rehabil. 2011;33(13-14):1147-56
pubmed: 20942619
BMC Public Health. 2010 Oct 26;10:648
pubmed: 20977767
Ann Agric Environ Med. 2010;17(2):251-7
pubmed: 21186767
Stat Med. 2011 Feb 20;30(4):377-99
pubmed: 21225900
Stress Health. 2013 Feb;29(1):14-21
pubmed: 22337584
Ind Health. 2012;50(4):288-98
pubmed: 22673362
Occup Med (Lond). 2013 Jun;63(4):266-73
pubmed: 23599176
Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2013;19(4):513-21
pubmed: 24321630
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2014 May 1;40(3):278-86
pubmed: 24407882
Res Q Exerc Sport. 1989 Mar;60(1):48-58
pubmed: 2489825
Ann Intern Med. 2015 Jan 6;162(1):W1-73
pubmed: 25560730
Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2015 Jun;29(3):356-73
pubmed: 26612235
Disabil Rehabil. 2018 Jan;40(2):168-175
pubmed: 27830962
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2018 Mar 1;44(2):156-162
pubmed: 29306961
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2018 May 1;44(3):274-282
pubmed: 29363714
J Epidemiol Community Health. 1995 Oct;49(5):474-81
pubmed: 7499989
J Clin Epidemiol. 1996 Dec;49(12):1373-9
pubmed: 8970487