Bioreactivity and Microbiome of Biodeposits from Filter-Feeding Bivalves.


Journal

Microbial ecology
ISSN: 1432-184X
Titre abrégé: Microb Ecol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7500663

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Feb 2019
Historique:
received: 27 08 2018
accepted: 20 12 2018
pubmed: 7 1 2019
medline: 1 3 2019
entrez: 7 1 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Bivalves serve an important ecosystem function in delivering organic matter from pelagic to benthic zones and are important in mediating eutrophication. However, the fate of this organic matter (i.e., biodeposits) is an important consideration when assessing the ecological roles of these organisms in coastal ecosystems. In addition to environmental conditions, the processing of biodeposits is dependent on its composition and the metabolic capacity of the associated microbial community. The objectives of this study were to compare the biological reactivity, potential denitrification rates, and microbial communities of biodeposits sourced from different bivalve species: hard clam (Mercenaria mercenaria), eastern oyster (Crassostrea virginica), and ribbed mussel (Geukensia demissa). To our knowledge, this is the first study to investigate and compare the microbiome of bivalve biodeposits using high-throughput sequencing and provide important insight into the mechanisms by which bivalves may alter sediment microbial communities and benthic biogeochemical cycles. We show that clam biodeposits had significantly higher bioreactivity compared to mussel and oyster biodeposits, as reflected in higher dissolved inorganic carbon and ammonium production rates in controlled incubations. Potential denitrification rates were also significantly higher for clam biodeposits compared to oyster and mussel biodeposits. The microbial communities associated with the biodeposits were significantly different across bivalve species, with significantly greater abundances of Alteromonadales, Chitinophagales, Rhodobacterales, and Thiotrichales associated with the clam biodeposits. These bioreactivity and microbial differences across bivalve species are likely due to differences in bivalve physiology and feeding behavior and should be considered when evaluating the effects of bivalves on water quality and ecosystem function.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30612185
doi: 10.1007/s00248-018-01312-4
pii: 10.1007/s00248-018-01312-4
doi:

Substances chimiques

Ammonium Compounds 0
Carbon 7440-44-0

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

343-357

Subventions

Organisme : National Science Foundation
ID : OCE 1062882
Organisme : National Science Foundation
ID : OCE 1233801
Organisme : National Science Foundation
ID : LTER 0080381
Organisme : Virginia Sea Grant, Virginia Institute of Marine Science
ID : NA10OAR4170085

Références

Appl Environ Microbiol. 2002 Mar;68(3):1312-8
pubmed: 11872482
Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2005 May;55(Pt 3):1051-7
pubmed: 15879232
Microb Ecol. 2007 Oct;54(3):469-77
pubmed: 17308984
Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2007 Jul;57(Pt 7):1653-8
pubmed: 17625211
Mol Biol Evol. 2008 Sep;25(9):1955-66
pubmed: 18614527
Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2008 Sep;58(Pt 9):2215-23
pubmed: 18768632
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Mar 15;108 Suppl 1:4516-22
pubmed: 20534432
BMC Bioinformatics. 2010 Oct 30;11:538
pubmed: 21034504
PLoS One. 2012;7(10):e48410
pubmed: 23144762
PLoS One. 2012;7(12):e51475
pubmed: 23251548
PLoS One. 2013 Apr 22;8(4):e61217
pubmed: 23630581
FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2014 Apr;88(1):69-83
pubmed: 24325323
Genome Biol. 2014;15(12):550
pubmed: 25516281
FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2015 Jan;91(1):1-12
pubmed: 25764528
Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 2015 Jun;107(6):1625-32
pubmed: 25903846
Environ Microbiol. 2016 Mar;18(3):970-87
pubmed: 26695476
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2016 May 02;82(10):2975-2987
pubmed: 26969704
Nat Methods. 2016 Jul;13(7):581-3
pubmed: 27214047
Sci Total Environ. 2016 Oct 1;566-567:1168-1175
pubmed: 27265734
Genom Data. 2016 Jul 02;9:95-6
pubmed: 27437183
Front Microbiol. 2016 Dec 20;7:2003
pubmed: 28066339
PeerJ. 2017 Jul 12;5:e3536
pubmed: 28717594
PLoS One. 2017 Sep 21;12(9):e0185071
pubmed: 28934286
Mar Pollut Bull. 2018 Feb;127:524-535
pubmed: 29475692
Microb Biotechnol. 2018 Sep;11(5):848-858
pubmed: 29749083
Front Microbiol. 2018 Sep 11;9:2121
pubmed: 30254616

Auteurs

Anna E Murphy (AE)

Marine Science Center, Northeastern University, Nahant, MA, 01908, USA. an.murphy@northeastern.edu.
College of William & Mary, Virginia Institute of Marine Science, Gloucester Point, VA, 23062, USA. an.murphy@northeastern.edu.

Rebecca Kolkmeyer (R)

University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, 22904, USA.

Bongkuen Song (B)

College of William & Mary, Virginia Institute of Marine Science, Gloucester Point, VA, 23062, USA.

Iris C Anderson (IC)

College of William & Mary, Virginia Institute of Marine Science, Gloucester Point, VA, 23062, USA.

Jennifer Bowen (J)

Marine Science Center, Northeastern University, Nahant, MA, 01908, USA.

Articles similaires

Genome, Chloroplast Phylogeny Genetic Markers Base Composition High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing
Robotic Surgical Procedures Animals Humans Telemedicine Models, Animal

Odour generalisation and detection dog training.

Lyn Caldicott, Thomas W Pike, Helen E Zulch et al.
1.00
Animals Odorants Dogs Generalization, Psychological Smell
Animals TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases Colorectal Neoplasms Colitis Mice

Classifications MeSH