Lidocaine medicated plaster, an additional potential treatment option for localized post-surgical neuropathic pain: efficacy and safety results of a randomized, placebo-controlled trial.

Peripheral neuropathic pain chronic post-surgical neuropathic pain lidocaine 700 mg medicated plaster neuropathic pain placebo-controlled randomized controlled trial topical treatment

Journal

Current medical research and opinion
ISSN: 1473-4877
Titre abrégé: Curr Med Res Opin
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0351014

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
05 2019
Historique:
pubmed: 8 1 2019
medline: 25 3 2020
entrez: 8 1 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

To assess the efficacy and safety of lidocaine 700 mg medicated plaster (lidocaine plaster) compared to placebo in patients with moderate to severe chronic post-surgical neuropathic pain (PSNP). Patients (n = 363) with a diagnosis of PSNP for a minimum of 3 months to 36 months were randomized (1:1) to lidocaine plaster or placebo for a 12 week double-blind treatment period. Randomization was stratified as "plaster-only" (no concomitant medication for PSNP) or as "add-on" (stable systemic medication for PSNP). The primary efficacy endpoint was the change from baseline in 24 hour average pain intensity at Week 12, assessed by 11 point numerical rating scale (NRS). The trial was registered in ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01752322) and EudraCT (2012-000347-28). Treatment with lidocaine or placebo plaster led to a clinically relevant reduction in average pain intensity. Pain reduction (least squares mean [LS mean] standard error [SE], [95% confidence interval, CI]) with lidocaine plaster (-1.70 [0.16], [-2.03, -1.38]) was numerically higher than with placebo (-1.47 [0.16], [-1.78, -1.15]) but the difference was not statistically significant (-0.23 [0.23], [-0.69, 0.22]). Pre-specified exploratory subgroup analyses showed the largest differentiation between lidocaine and placebo in patients without concomitant pain medication, and in patients with more than 1 year between surgery and enrollment. Many secondary outcomes showed a numerically larger improvement in favor of lidocaine. The most commonly reported adverse events were administration site reactions linked to topical administration. A clinically relevant pain reduction was observed with lidocaine plaster in patients with PSNP. The safety and tolerability profile is consistent with current knowledge.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30614286
doi: 10.1080/03007995.2019.1565709
doi:

Substances chimiques

Lidocaine 98PI200987

Banques de données

ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT01752322']
EudraCT
['2012-000347-28']

Types de publication

Clinical Trial, Phase III Journal Article Multicenter Study Randomized Controlled Trial Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

757-766

Auteurs

Mariana Palladini (M)

a Centro Paulista De Dor , São Paulo , Brazil.

Irmgard Boesl (I)

b Innovation Unit Pain - Clinical Science, Grünenthal GmbH , Aachen , Germany.

Simone Koenig (S)

b Innovation Unit Pain - Clinical Science, Grünenthal GmbH , Aachen , Germany.

Bettina Buchheister (B)

c Biostatistics, Grünenthal GmbH , Aachen , Germany.

Nadine Attal (N)

d Université Versailles Saint Quentin en Yvelines , Versailles , France.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH