Differences in the strain applied to Achilles tendon fibers when the subtalar joint is overpronated: a simulation study.
Achilles tendon
Achilles tendon disorder
Three-dimensional model
Twisted structure
Journal
Surgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA
ISSN: 1279-8517
Titre abrégé: Surg Radiol Anat
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 8608029
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
May 2019
May 2019
Historique:
received:
27
11
2018
accepted:
03
01
2019
pubmed:
9
1
2019
medline:
7
5
2019
entrez:
9
1
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The purpose of this study was to investigate the strain applied to each of the tendon fiber bundles of the medial head of the gastrocnemius (MG), the lateral head of the gastrocnemius (LG), and the soleus muscle (Sol) that compose the Achilles tendon (AT) when the subtalar joint is pronated and supinated. Three AT twist types (least, moderate, extreme) were investigated. Using the MicroScribe system, the AT and the talocrural and subtalar joints were digitized to reconstruct three-dimensional models. Using this system, subtalar joint rotations in the pronation (20°) and supination (20°) directions were simulated, and the degrees of strain (%) on each tendon were calculated. For all twist types, when the subtalar joint was pronated, MG, LG, and Sol stretched, and when supinated, MG, LG, and Sol shortened. In particular, the least and severe twist types had large degrees of strain of Sol when the subtalar joint was pronated, and furthermore, each tendon fiber composing Sol had different degrees of strain. The study results suggest that the degree of strain applied within the AT with subtalar joint pronation is not constant, and that, especially in least and extreme twist types, the risk of developing AT disorders may increase.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30617509
doi: 10.1007/s00276-019-02181-3
pii: 10.1007/s00276-019-02181-3
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
595-599Références
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2002 Jan;84(1):1-8
pubmed: 11837811
Am J Sports Med. 2002 Mar-Apr;30(2):287-305
pubmed: 11912103
Foot Ankle Clin. 2005 Sep;10(3):425-42, v
pubmed: 16081013
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2005 Nov;99(5):1965-71
pubmed: 16081623
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2010 Sep;40(9):A1-26
pubmed: 20805627
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2012 Nov;27(9):955-61
pubmed: 22883073
Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2015 Oct;25(5):e497-503
pubmed: 25557958
J Foot Ankle Res. 2017 Dec 28;10:60
pubmed: 29299066
Am J Sports Med. 1984 May-Jun;12(3):179-84
pubmed: 6742297