Decoding Native Cortical Representations for Flexion and Extension at Upper Limb Joints Using Electrocorticography.
Adolescent
Adult
Brain-Computer Interfaces
Elbow Joint
/ physiology
Electrocorticography
/ methods
Feasibility Studies
Female
Fingers
/ physiology
Humans
Joints
/ physiology
Linear Models
Machine Learning
Male
Photic Stimulation
Sensorimotor Cortex
/ physiology
Upper Extremity
/ physiology
Wrist Joint
/ physiology
Young Adult
Journal
IEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society
ISSN: 1558-0210
Titre abrégé: IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101097023
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
02 2019
02 2019
Historique:
pubmed:
10
1
2019
medline:
21
1
2020
entrez:
10
1
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Brain-machine interface (BMI) researchers have traditionally focused on modeling endpoint reaching tasks to provide the control of neurally driven prosthetic arms. Most previous research has focused on achieving an endpoint control through a Cartesian-coordinate-centered approach. However, a joint-centered approach could potentially be used to intuitively control a wide range of limb movements. We systematically investigated the feasibility of discriminating between flexion and extension of different upper limb joints using electrocorticography(ECoG) recordings from sensorimotor cortex. Four subjects implanted with macro-ECoG (10-mm spacing), high-density ECoG (5-mm spacing), and/or micro-ECoG arrays (0.9-mm spacing and 4 mm × 4 mm coverage), performed randomly cued flexions or extensions of the fingers, wrist, or elbow contralateral to the implanted hemisphere. We trained a linear model to classify six movements using averaged high-gamma power (70-110 Hz) modulations at different latencies with respect to movement onset, and within a time interval restricted to flexion or extension at each joint. Offline decoding models for each subject classified these movements with accuracies of 62%-83%. Our results suggest that the widespread ECoG coverage of sensorimotor cortex could allow a whole limb BMI to sample native cortical representations in order to control flexion and extension at multiple joints.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30624221
doi: 10.1109/TNSRE.2019.2891362
pmc: PMC6375785
mid: NIHMS1005783
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
293-303Subventions
Organisme : NINDS NIH HHS
ID : R01 NS088606
Pays : United States
Références
Brain Res. 2000 Feb 21;856(1-2):291-300
pubmed: 10677638
Brain Struct Funct. 2017 Nov;222(8):3705-3748
pubmed: 28523425
J Neurosci. 2012 Jan 25;32(4):1220-32
pubmed: 22279207
Eur J Neurosci. 1997 Oct;9(10):2178-86
pubmed: 9421177
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2002 Oct;23(9):1524-32
pubmed: 12372742
J Neurosci. 2010 Jul 21;30(29):9659-69
pubmed: 20660249
Brain. 1998 Dec;121 ( Pt 12):2301-15
pubmed: 9874481
IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2014 May;22(3):695-705
pubmed: 24235276
Neuron. 2002 May 30;34(5):841-51
pubmed: 12062029
Somatosens Mot Res. 1990;7(4):485-514
pubmed: 2291379
Science. 1979 May 4;204(4392):521-3
pubmed: 107591
Lancet. 2017 May 6;389(10081):1821-1830
pubmed: 28363483
Physiol Rev. 1983 Jan;63(1):206-31
pubmed: 6401864
J Neurophysiol. 2001 Nov;86(5):2125-43
pubmed: 11698506
J Neurosci. 1990 Mar;10(3):952-74
pubmed: 2108231
Cereb Cortex. 2001 Apr;11(4):312-21
pubmed: 11278194
IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2006 Jun;14(2):194-8
pubmed: 16792292
Lancet. 2013 Feb 16;381(9866):557-64
pubmed: 23253623
J Neurophysiol. 2010 May;103(5):2544-56
pubmed: 20164393
J Neural Eng. 2016 Apr;13(2):026017-26017
pubmed: 26863276
Neuroimage. 2000 May;11(5 Pt 1):473-81
pubmed: 10806033
J Neural Eng. 2016 Apr;13(2):026021
pubmed: 26902372
IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2017 Apr;25(4):370-379
pubmed: 28060708
J Neurophysiol. 1980 Apr;43(4):1070-89
pubmed: 6766994
Nature. 2016 Apr 13;533(7602):247-50
pubmed: 27074513
PLoS One. 2013;8(2):e55344
pubmed: 23405137
J Neural Eng. 2004 Jun;1(2):63-71
pubmed: 15876624
Nat Med. 2015 Oct;21(10):1142-5
pubmed: 26413781
PLoS One. 2013 Aug 21;8(8):e72085
pubmed: 23991046
J Neural Eng. 2016 Apr;13(2):026016
pubmed: 26859341
J Neurophysiol. 2005 Dec;94(6):4209-23
pubmed: 16120657
J Neural Eng. 2007 Sep;4(3):264-75
pubmed: 17873429
Ann Neurol. 2012 Mar;71(3):353-61
pubmed: 22052728
J Comp Neurol. 1980 Aug 15;192(4):611-43
pubmed: 7419747
J Neurosci. 2007 Feb 28;27(9):2424-32
pubmed: 17329441
Nature. 2012 May 16;485(7398):372-5
pubmed: 22596161
Neuroimage. 2004;23 Suppl 1:S34-45
pubmed: 15501099
Exp Brain Res. 1992;89(1):1-19
pubmed: 1601087
J Comp Neurol. 1986 May 15;247(3):297-325
pubmed: 3722441
J Neural Eng. 2008 Mar;5(1):75-84
pubmed: 18310813
J Neurophysiol. 1980 Apr;43(4):1090-110
pubmed: 6766995
J Neural Eng. 2015 Feb;12(1):016011
pubmed: 25514320
IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2008 Feb;16(1):15-23
pubmed: 18303801
IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2011 Apr;19(2):193-203
pubmed: 21278024
Sci Transl Med. 2016 Oct 19;8(361):361ra141
pubmed: 27738096