The potential role of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in the further investigation of colorectal cancer patients with nonspecific findings on standard investigations.
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Biomarkers, Tumor
/ blood
Circulating Tumor DNA
/ genetics
Colorectal Neoplasms
/ diagnosis
Early Detection of Cancer
Female
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Neoplasm Metastasis
Neoplasm Recurrence, Local
/ diagnosis
Positron-Emission Tomography
/ methods
Prospective Studies
Watchful Waiting
colorectal cancer
ctDNA
indeterminate findings
recurrence detection
Journal
International journal of cancer
ISSN: 1097-0215
Titre abrégé: Int J Cancer
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0042124
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
15 07 2019
15 07 2019
Historique:
received:
17
09
2018
revised:
03
12
2018
accepted:
19
12
2018
pubmed:
11
1
2019
medline:
2
11
2019
entrez:
11
1
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Early detection of metastatic colorectal cancer, at initial diagnosis or during routine surveillance, can improve survival outcomes. Current routine investigations, including CEA and CT, have limited sensitivity and specificity. Recent studies of colorectal cancer cohorts under post surgery surveillance indicate circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) evidence of recurrence can occur many months before clinical detection. Another possible role for ctDNA is in the further assessment of indeterminate findings on standard CEA or CT investigations. To further explore this potential, we undertook a prospective study. Further investigation, including FDG-PET imaging, was at clinician discretion, blinded to ctDNA analysis. Forty-nine patients were enrolled. Analyzed here are the 45 patients with an evaluable blood sample of whom 6 had an isolated elevated CEA, 30 had indeterminate CT findings, and 9 had both. FDG-PET scans were performed in 30 patients. Fourteen of 45 patients (31%) had detectable ctDNA. At completion of the planned 2 year follow-up, recurrence has occurred in 21 (47%) patients. Detectable ctDNA at study entry was associated with inferior relapse free survival (HR 4.85, p < 0.0001). Where FDG-PET scan was normal/equivocal (n = 15, 50%) 1 of 1 with detectable ctDNA versus 3 of 14 with undetectable ctDNA ultimately had recurrence confirmed. In summary, for colorectal cancer patients with indeterminate findings on routine investigations, ctDNA detection increases the probability that the findings indicate metastatic disease, including in a nonpredefined subset that also underwent FDG-PET imaging. Further studies of the value of ctDNA analysis during patient surveillance are warranted.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30628066
doi: 10.1002/ijc.32117
pmc: PMC6563608
mid: NIHMS1013506
doi:
Substances chimiques
Biomarkers, Tumor
0
Circulating Tumor DNA
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
540-547Subventions
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : R37 CA043460
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIGMS NIH HHS
ID : T32 GM007309
Pays : United States
Organisme : National Institute of Health
ID : CA62924
Pays : International
Organisme : Howard Hughes Medical Institute
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : P50 CA062924
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : P30 CA006973
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
© 2019 UICC.
Références
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2017 Mar 1;51(3):504-510
pubmed: 27773868
Int J Cancer. 2017 Jun 15;140(12):2642-2647
pubmed: 28124376
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2000 Apr;174(4):1005-8
pubmed: 10749239
Gut. 2019 Apr;68(4):663-671
pubmed: 29420226
Br J Cancer. 2008 Mar 11;98(5):875-80
pubmed: 18301402
CA Cancer J Clin. 2017 May 6;67(3):177-193
pubmed: 28248415
Gut. 2017 Apr;66(4):683-691
pubmed: 26818619
Ann Oncol. 2015 Aug;26(8):1715-22
pubmed: 25851626
Sci Transl Med. 2014 Feb 19;6(224):224ra24
pubmed: 24553385
World J Gastroenterol. 2015 Mar 14;21(10):2967-72
pubmed: 25780294
Ann Nucl Med. 2012 Aug;26(7):551-8
pubmed: 22644560
J Oncol Pract. 2016 Jan;12(1):33-9
pubmed: 26759464
J Clin Oncol. 2009 Dec 20;27(36):e279-80; author reply e281
pubmed: 19901127
Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2016 Dec;50(4):292-299
pubmed: 27994684
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Jun 7;108(23):9530-5
pubmed: 21586637
Sci Transl Med. 2016 Jul 6;8(346):346ra92
pubmed: 27384348