Invasive pneumococcal diseases in children and adults before and after introduction of the 10-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine into the Austrian national immunization program.
Adolescent
Adult
Age Factors
Austria
/ epidemiology
Child
Child, Preschool
Female
Humans
Immunization Programs
/ statistics & numerical data
Immunization Schedule
Incidence
Infant
Male
Middle Aged
Pneumococcal Infections
/ epidemiology
Pneumococcal Vaccines
/ administration & dosage
Program Evaluation
Streptococcus pneumoniae
/ isolation & purification
Vaccination Coverage
/ statistics & numerical data
Vaccines, Conjugate
Young Adult
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2019
2019
Historique:
received:
26
06
2018
accepted:
17
12
2018
entrez:
11
1
2019
pubmed:
11
1
2019
medline:
1
10
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
In February 2012 the ten-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV10) with a 2+1 doses schedule (3, 5, 12 or 14 months of age) without catch-up vaccination was introduced in Austria. We assessed direct and indirect vaccine effects on invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD) by a population-based intervention study. The study period was divided into pre- (2009-2011) and post-period (2013-2017, February), regarding 2012 as transition year. Outcomes were defined as PCV10 ST-IPD, the PCV10-related ST 6A and 19A IPD and non-PCV10 excluding ST 6A-/19A-IPD (NVT-IPD). We used national surveillance data and compared average monthly incidence rate (IR) between pre- and post-period among <5, 5-49 and ≥50 years old. Additionally, for the 5-49 and ≥50 years old, and the 50-59 and ≥60 years old, we analyzed monthly incidence data of the pre-, post-period, and estimated trend and level changes by using a segmented time-series regression. The PCV-10 IPD was reduced by 58% (95% CI: 30%; 74%) and 67% (95% CI: 32%; 84%) among <5 and ≥50 years old; the reduction in ≥60 years was 71% (95% CI: 36%; 88%). There were no significant changes in the pre-post-rate or incidence trend of NVT-IPD in the <5 and ≥50 years old. ST-specific analyses revealed no ST 6A- and ST 19A IPD decline in any age-group, and a ST 8 IPD increase among ≥50 years old (IR ratio: 3.5; 95% CI: 1.7; 7.2). We found no vaccine effects among 5-49 years old. Our study adds to the evidence on direct and indirect protection of a childhood PCV10 vaccine program. Elderlies seem to benefit the most. Findings did not support PCV 10 cross-protection, but indicate replacement at least for ST 8 among the ≥50 years old. Follow-up analyses of IPD surveillance data are needed to fully characterize the magnitude of serotype replacement and further vaccine-attributable IPD reduction with time.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
In February 2012 the ten-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV10) with a 2+1 doses schedule (3, 5, 12 or 14 months of age) without catch-up vaccination was introduced in Austria. We assessed direct and indirect vaccine effects on invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD) by a population-based intervention study.
METHODS
The study period was divided into pre- (2009-2011) and post-period (2013-2017, February), regarding 2012 as transition year. Outcomes were defined as PCV10 ST-IPD, the PCV10-related ST 6A and 19A IPD and non-PCV10 excluding ST 6A-/19A-IPD (NVT-IPD). We used national surveillance data and compared average monthly incidence rate (IR) between pre- and post-period among <5, 5-49 and ≥50 years old. Additionally, for the 5-49 and ≥50 years old, and the 50-59 and ≥60 years old, we analyzed monthly incidence data of the pre-, post-period, and estimated trend and level changes by using a segmented time-series regression.
RESULTS
The PCV-10 IPD was reduced by 58% (95% CI: 30%; 74%) and 67% (95% CI: 32%; 84%) among <5 and ≥50 years old; the reduction in ≥60 years was 71% (95% CI: 36%; 88%). There were no significant changes in the pre-post-rate or incidence trend of NVT-IPD in the <5 and ≥50 years old. ST-specific analyses revealed no ST 6A- and ST 19A IPD decline in any age-group, and a ST 8 IPD increase among ≥50 years old (IR ratio: 3.5; 95% CI: 1.7; 7.2). We found no vaccine effects among 5-49 years old.
CONCLUSIONS
Our study adds to the evidence on direct and indirect protection of a childhood PCV10 vaccine program. Elderlies seem to benefit the most. Findings did not support PCV 10 cross-protection, but indicate replacement at least for ST 8 among the ≥50 years old. Follow-up analyses of IPD surveillance data are needed to fully characterize the magnitude of serotype replacement and further vaccine-attributable IPD reduction with time.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30629620
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0210081
pii: PONE-D-18-19058
pmc: PMC6328268
doi:
Substances chimiques
10-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine
0
Pneumococcal Vaccines
0
Vaccines, Conjugate
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0210081Commentaires et corrections
Type : ErratumIn
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
LR, DS, EK, MK, and HB did not receive any specific funding, their work was part of the national surveillance programm of the Austrian Agency for health and Food Safety. UW, JJ, EP are employed by the Medical University Vienna, which received an investigator initiated grant from Pfizer AG for cooperation with children hospitals in Austria. We thus confirm that we adhere to all Plos One policies on sharing data and material.
Références
Lancet Infect Dis. 2018 Apr;18(4):441-451
pubmed: 29395999
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Oct 07;(4):CD004977
pubmed: 19821336
Vaccine. 2017 May 19;35(22):2882-2891
pubmed: 28449971
Wkly Epidemiol Rec. 2010 Oct 22;85(43):434-6
pubmed: 21038716
Lancet Infect Dis. 2015 Mar;15(3):301-9
pubmed: 25656600
Lancet. 2011 Dec 3;378(9807):1962-73
pubmed: 21492929
Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2016 Apr;29(2):187-96
pubmed: 26779776
F1000Res. 2016 Sep 14;5:2320
pubmed: 27703671
J Biopharm Stat. 2011 Nov;21(6):1164-76
pubmed: 22023684
BMC Infect Dis. 2015 Oct 14;15:419
pubmed: 26468008
Vaccine. 2015 May 28;33(23):2684-9
pubmed: 25887086
PLoS One. 2015 Mar 17;10(3):e0120290
pubmed: 25781031
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2014 May;20 Suppl 5:45-51
pubmed: 24313448
Clin Microbiol Rev. 2015 Jul;28(3):871-99
pubmed: 26085553
Vaccine. 2015 Nov 17;33(46):6145-8
pubmed: 26469718
Lancet Infect Dis. 2015 May;15(5):535-43
pubmed: 25801458
Clin Infect Dis. 2014 Oct 15;59(8):1066-73
pubmed: 25034421
J Vis Exp. 2014 Feb 24;(84):e51208
pubmed: 24637727
J Clin Epidemiol. 2009 Feb;62(2):143-8
pubmed: 19010644
Vaccine. 2014 Mar 14;32(13):1501-6
pubmed: 24486346
Lancet Respir Med. 2014 Jun;2(6):464-71
pubmed: 24726406
Adv Ther. 2013 Feb;30(2):127-51
pubmed: 23397399
J Clin Pharm Ther. 2002 Aug;27(4):299-309
pubmed: 12174032
Lancet. 2009 Sep 12;374(9693):893-902
pubmed: 19748398
Vaccine. 2015 Jan 3;33(2):359-66
pubmed: 25448105
Epidemics. 2015 Jun;11:24-31
pubmed: 25979279
Lancet Glob Health. 2014 Jul;2(7):e397-405
pubmed: 25103393
PLoS Med. 2011 Oct;8(10):e1001107
pubmed: 22028630
Acad Pediatr. 2013 Nov-Dec;13(6 Suppl):S38-44
pubmed: 24268083
Expert Rev Vaccines. 2015;14(10):1359-66
pubmed: 26289973
J Infect. 2014 Oct;69(4):309-25
pubmed: 24968238
PLoS Med. 2013;10(9):e1001517
pubmed: 24086113
Lancet. 2013 Jan 19;381(9862):214-22
pubmed: 23158882
PLoS One. 2017 Apr 6;12(4):e0175224
pubmed: 28384325
Emerg Infect Dis. 2015 Nov;21(11):2040-4
pubmed: 26488415
Expert Rev Vaccines. 2017 Oct;16(10):1007-1027
pubmed: 28783380
Pediatrics. 2009 Jun;123(6):e1103-10
pubmed: 19482744
Lancet Respir Med. 2014 Sep;2(9):717-27
pubmed: 25127244
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2012 Oct;18 Suppl 5:7-14
pubmed: 22882668
Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2016;12(2):358-74
pubmed: 26905681
Clin Infect Dis. 2017 Nov 13;65(11):1780-1789
pubmed: 29020171
Expert Rev Vaccines. 2017 Jul;16(7):1-4
pubmed: 28535704
Eur J Pediatr. 2014 Apr;173(4):469-76
pubmed: 24221605
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2016 Mar 4;113(9):139-46
pubmed: 26987462
BMC Infect Dis. 2015 May 05;15:207
pubmed: 25940580
N Engl J Med. 2014 Nov 13;371(20):1889-99
pubmed: 25386897