Doppler-guided transanal hemorrhoidal dearterilization versus conventional hemorrhoidectomy for treatment of hemorrhoids - early and long-term postoperative results.
Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Female
Hemorrhoidectomy
/ methods
Hemorrhoids
/ surgery
Humans
Length of Stay
Male
Middle Aged
Pain, Postoperative
/ etiology
Patient Satisfaction
Postoperative Complications
/ etiology
Postoperative Period
Prospective Studies
Rectum
/ surgery
Recurrence
Treatment Outcome
Ultrasonography, Doppler
/ methods
Young Adult
Conventional hemorrhoidectomy
Hemorrhoids
Long-term outcomes
Postoperative pain
Transanal hemorrhoidal dearterilization
Journal
BMC surgery
ISSN: 1471-2482
Titre abrégé: BMC Surg
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100968567
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
10 Jan 2019
10 Jan 2019
Historique:
received:
02
11
2017
accepted:
02
01
2019
entrez:
12
1
2019
pubmed:
12
1
2019
medline:
12
2
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
A variety of effective methods for treatment of hemorrhoids has been proposed. In recent years, there has been an increasing number of studies comparing transanal hemorrhoidal dearterilization (THD) and conventional hemorrhoidectomy (CH), but the focus of most studies has been about the early postoperative results. The data about long-term outcomes is still limited. We aimed to compare Doppler-guided THD and CH with regard to early and long-term postoperative results. The conducted prospective research included 287 patients who underwent CH (167 cases) or Doppler-guided THD with mycopexy (120 patients) between November 2010 and December 2015. Information on hemorrhoidal stage, demographic data, presenting symptoms, complications, duration of hospital stay, postoperative pain, patients' satisfaction and follow-up were obtained. Statistical tests were performed by SPSS 19.0. There was no significant difference between the studied groups according to gender, mean age, preoperative prolapse, pain and pruritus, hemorrhoidal stage and postoperative complications. Preoperative bleeding was more frequent in THD group (p = 0,002). The mean visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores in CH and THD groups on days 1, 2 and 7 were 7.01 vs 5.03, 5.07 vs 2.98, 2.39 vs 0,57 (p = 0,000). Practically, there was no difference in VAS on day 30 and patients' satisfaction at the 18th month. Mean hospital stay was 5,13 (CH) and 3,38 days (THD), p = 0,000. The postoperative follow-up was between 18 and 78 months (mean 46 ± 16 months). During this stage, 5 patients (2,99%) in CH group required surgery for recurrence. In THD group, 3 patients (2,5%), all with 4th-degree hemorrhoids underwent additional procedures (p 0,802). Doppler-guided THD seems to be an efficient and safe option for treatment of hemorrhoids, related to lower postoperative pain and excellent, similar long-term outcomes compared to CH. For advanced grades of hemorrhoids, Doppler-guided THD could be a valuable alternative, but there is a need for patients' selection. (retrospectively registered) researchregistry 3090 .
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
A variety of effective methods for treatment of hemorrhoids has been proposed. In recent years, there has been an increasing number of studies comparing transanal hemorrhoidal dearterilization (THD) and conventional hemorrhoidectomy (CH), but the focus of most studies has been about the early postoperative results. The data about long-term outcomes is still limited. We aimed to compare Doppler-guided THD and CH with regard to early and long-term postoperative results.
METHODS
METHODS
The conducted prospective research included 287 patients who underwent CH (167 cases) or Doppler-guided THD with mycopexy (120 patients) between November 2010 and December 2015. Information on hemorrhoidal stage, demographic data, presenting symptoms, complications, duration of hospital stay, postoperative pain, patients' satisfaction and follow-up were obtained. Statistical tests were performed by SPSS 19.0.
RESULTS
RESULTS
There was no significant difference between the studied groups according to gender, mean age, preoperative prolapse, pain and pruritus, hemorrhoidal stage and postoperative complications. Preoperative bleeding was more frequent in THD group (p = 0,002). The mean visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores in CH and THD groups on days 1, 2 and 7 were 7.01 vs 5.03, 5.07 vs 2.98, 2.39 vs 0,57 (p = 0,000). Practically, there was no difference in VAS on day 30 and patients' satisfaction at the 18th month. Mean hospital stay was 5,13 (CH) and 3,38 days (THD), p = 0,000. The postoperative follow-up was between 18 and 78 months (mean 46 ± 16 months). During this stage, 5 patients (2,99%) in CH group required surgery for recurrence. In THD group, 3 patients (2,5%), all with 4th-degree hemorrhoids underwent additional procedures (p 0,802).
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Doppler-guided THD seems to be an efficient and safe option for treatment of hemorrhoids, related to lower postoperative pain and excellent, similar long-term outcomes compared to CH. For advanced grades of hemorrhoids, Doppler-guided THD could be a valuable alternative, but there is a need for patients' selection.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
BACKGROUND
(retrospectively registered) researchregistry 3090 .
Identifiants
pubmed: 30630463
doi: 10.1186/s12893-019-0469-9
pii: 10.1186/s12893-019-0469-9
pmc: PMC6327383
doi:
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
4Références
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2004 Mar;19(2):176-80
pubmed: 12845454
Dis Colon Rectum. 1992 Aug;35(8):743-6
pubmed: 1643997
Tech Coloproctol. 2007 Dec;11(4):333-8; discussion 338-9
pubmed: 18060529
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Jan 21;(1):CD006761
pubmed: 19160300
Dis Colon Rectum. 2009 Sep;52(9):1665-71
pubmed: 19690499
Dis Colon Rectum. 2011 Feb;54(2):226-31
pubmed: 21228673
Tech Coloproctol. 2011 Jun;15(2):191-7
pubmed: 21505901
Tech Coloproctol. 2012 Feb;16(1):61-5
pubmed: 22190190
Ann Surg. 2012 May;255(5):840-5
pubmed: 22504188
Dis Colon Rectum. 2013 Apr;56(4):484-90
pubmed: 23478616
Khirurgiia (Sofiia). 2013;(3):4-7
pubmed: 24459760
Colorectal Dis. 2014 May;16(5):373-6
pubmed: 24460621
Dis Colon Rectum. 2014 Mar;57(3):348-53
pubmed: 24509458
J Visc Surg. 2015 Apr;152(2 Suppl):S15-21
pubmed: 25262549
Tech Coloproctol. 2015 Mar;19(3):153-7
pubmed: 25637412
World J Gastrointest Surg. 2016 Jan 27;8(1):1-4
pubmed: 26843909
World J Gastrointest Surg. 2016 Mar 27;8(3):232-7
pubmed: 27022450
Tech Coloproctol. 2016 Dec;20(12):825-833
pubmed: 27888438
Int J Surg Case Rep. 2017;30:73-75
pubmed: 27960130
Tech Coloproctol. 2017 May;21(5):337-344
pubmed: 28451767
Am J Gastroenterol. 1995 Apr;90(4):610-3
pubmed: 7717320