Initial development of Supportive care Assessment, Prioritization and Recommendations for Kids (SPARK), a symptom screening and management application.
Oncology
Pediatric cancer
Self-report
Supportive care
Symptom screening
Website development
Journal
BMC medical informatics and decision making
ISSN: 1472-6947
Titre abrégé: BMC Med Inform Decis Mak
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101088682
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
10 01 2019
10 01 2019
Historique:
received:
07
08
2018
accepted:
26
11
2018
entrez:
12
1
2019
pubmed:
12
1
2019
medline:
16
7
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
We developed Supportive care Prioritization, Assessment and Recommendations for Kids (SPARK), a web-based application designed to facilitate symptom screening by children receiving cancer treatments and access to supportive care clinical practice guidelines primarily by healthcare providers. The objective was to describe the initial development and evaluation of SPARK from the perspective of children. Development and evaluation occurred in three phases: (1) low fidelity focused on functionality, (2) design focused on "look and feel" and (3) high fidelity confirmed functionality and design. Cognitive interviews were conducted with children receiving cancer treatments 8-18 years of age. Evaluation occurred after every five interviews and changes were guided by a Review Panel. Quantitative evaluation included SPARK ease of use and understandability of SPARK reports. The number of children included by phase were: low fidelity (n = 30), design (n = 30) and high fidelity (n = 30). Across phases, the median age was 13.2 (range 8.5 to 18.4) years. During low-fidelity and design phases, iterative refinements to SPARK improved website navigation, usability and likability from the perspective of children and established symptom report design. Among the last 10 children enrolled to high-fidelity testing, all (100%) understood how to complete symptom screening, access reports and interpret reports. Among these 10 respondents, all (100%) found SPARK easy to use and 9 (90%) found SPARK reports were easy to understand. SPARK is a web-based application which is usable and understandable, and it is now appropriate to use for research. Future efforts will focus on clinical implementation of SPARK.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
We developed Supportive care Prioritization, Assessment and Recommendations for Kids (SPARK), a web-based application designed to facilitate symptom screening by children receiving cancer treatments and access to supportive care clinical practice guidelines primarily by healthcare providers. The objective was to describe the initial development and evaluation of SPARK from the perspective of children.
IMPLEMENTATION
Development and evaluation occurred in three phases: (1) low fidelity focused on functionality, (2) design focused on "look and feel" and (3) high fidelity confirmed functionality and design. Cognitive interviews were conducted with children receiving cancer treatments 8-18 years of age. Evaluation occurred after every five interviews and changes were guided by a Review Panel. Quantitative evaluation included SPARK ease of use and understandability of SPARK reports.
RESULTS
The number of children included by phase were: low fidelity (n = 30), design (n = 30) and high fidelity (n = 30). Across phases, the median age was 13.2 (range 8.5 to 18.4) years. During low-fidelity and design phases, iterative refinements to SPARK improved website navigation, usability and likability from the perspective of children and established symptom report design. Among the last 10 children enrolled to high-fidelity testing, all (100%) understood how to complete symptom screening, access reports and interpret reports. Among these 10 respondents, all (100%) found SPARK easy to use and 9 (90%) found SPARK reports were easy to understand.
CONCLUSIONS
SPARK is a web-based application which is usable and understandable, and it is now appropriate to use for research. Future efforts will focus on clinical implementation of SPARK.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30630480
doi: 10.1186/s12911-018-0715-6
pii: 10.1186/s12911-018-0715-6
pmc: PMC6327501
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
9Références
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2018 Jul;56(1):107-112
pubmed: 29630923
Cancer Med. 2018 May;7(5):1750-1755
pubmed: 29573197
Int J Med Inform. 2004 Nov;73(11-12):781-95
pubmed: 15491929
Br J Cancer. 2014 Sep 23;111(7):1262-8
pubmed: 25101569
JAMA Intern Med. 2013 Apr 8;173(7):559-68
pubmed: 23460379
Breast. 2010 Apr;19(2):120-7
pubmed: 20117932
J Pediatr Oncol Nurs. 2010 Nov-Dec;27(6):307-15
pubmed: 20739586
J Oncol Pract. 2015 May;11(3):187-9
pubmed: 25758449
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2018 Jun 1;110(6):661-668
pubmed: 29272441
Ann Oncol. 2012 Aug;23(8):1986-92
pubmed: 22396444
Support Care Cancer. 2014 Jan;22(1):71-5
pubmed: 23995756
Am Heart J. 2007 Jun;153(6):1006-12
pubmed: 17540203
BMC Cancer. 2012 Sep 26;12:430
pubmed: 23009053