Hearing loss in unilateral and bilateral enlarged vestibular aqueduct syndrome.
Audiometry, Pure-Tone
Bone Conduction
Child
Child, Preschool
Deafness
/ etiology
Female
Hearing
Hearing Loss, Sensorineural
/ complications
Hearing Loss, Unilateral
/ etiology
Humans
Longitudinal Studies
Male
Retrospective Studies
Speech Reception Threshold Test
Syndrome
Vestibular Aqueduct
/ abnormalities
Audiology
Congenital anomalies
Hearing loss
Radiology
Sensorineural hearing loss
Journal
International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology
ISSN: 1872-8464
Titre abrégé: Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol
Pays: Ireland
ID NLM: 8003603
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Mar 2019
Mar 2019
Historique:
received:
22
08
2018
revised:
14
12
2018
accepted:
16
12
2018
pubmed:
12
1
2019
medline:
16
3
2019
entrez:
12
1
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To investigate any meaningful differences in hearing between patients with unilateral and bilateral enlarged vestibular aqueduct (EVA). EVA is a common radiological finding in children presenting with hearing loss. We hope to provide insight into the pathogenesis of EVA and provide further guidelines for unilateral EVA management. We hypothesized that hearing loss in unilateral EVA would be similar to that seen in bilateral EVA. A longitudinal retrospective study design was used. Three measures of hearing, pure tone average (PTA) word recognition score (WRS) and speech awareness threshold (SAT) and radiologic morphologies were tested for difference across unilateral versus bilateral ear EVA status. Linear mixed effects models were used to identify differences while accounting for time and multiple measurements per ear. Using Cincinnati criteria, 89 ears fit inclusion criteria, 75 of which were from patients with bilateral EVA compared to 14 ears from patients with unilateral EVA. No significant differences across bilateral status were observed in audiological measurements. Models showed that speech recognition threshold (SRT) (p = 0.925), word recognition score (WRS)(p = 0.521) and pure tone average (PTA) of air and bone conduction from 250 to 4000 Hz (p = 0.281-0.933) were not statistically different with respect to bilateral status. Wilcoxon rank-sum tests showed no statistical difference in vestibular aqueduct width or operculum size (VA)(p = 0.234, p = 0.623). Each year after the first audiogram was associated with significantly greater SRT (p = 0.003) decreased WRS (0.014) and increased PTA (0.003.). Greater midpoint width was associated with significantly lower SRT (p = 0.004) WRS (<0.001) and PTA (<0.001.) CONCLUSION: Our results indicate no statistically significant difference in hearing ability with respect to bilateral EVA status, suggesting that unilateral EVA patients require close follow-up. Our results also demonstrate the progressive nature of EVA and a relationship between VA midpoint width and hearing loss severity.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30634102
pii: S0165-5876(18)30634-7
doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2018.12.023
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
147-151Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.