Neoadjuvant chemoradiation for patients with advanced oesophageal cancer - which response grading system best impacts prognostic discrimination?


Journal

Histopathology
ISSN: 1365-2559
Titre abrégé: Histopathology
Pays: England
ID NLM: 7704136

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Apr 2019
Historique:
received: 24 08 2018
accepted: 19 12 2018
pubmed: 13 1 2019
medline: 31 7 2019
entrez: 13 1 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Neoadjuvant chemoradiation reduces tumour volume and improves the R0 resection rate, followed by extended survival for patients with advanced oesophageal cancer. The degree of tumour regression has high prognostic relevance. To date, there is still no generally accepted tumour regression grading system. The aim of this study was to compare the prognostic discrimination power of different histological regression grading systems: (i) the fibrosis/tumour ratio within the primary tumour (Mandard classification), (ii) the percentage of residual vital tumour cells (VTC) compared to the original primary tumour (Cologne Regression) and (iii) the ypT category, in patients with cT3 carcinoma of the oesophagus after neoadjuvant chemoradiation. This study included 216 patients with oesophageal cancer clinically staged as cT3NxM0 and treated from 2009 to 2012 with standardised chemoradiation followed by oesophagectomy [median age 62 years, 176 (81%) male and 138 (64%) adenocarcinoma patients]. The subgroup frequencies of the three classification systems were ypT category: ypT0 = 18%, ypT1 = 14%, ypT2 = 23%, ypT3 = 44%, ypT4 = 1%; Mandard classification: TRG1 = 18%, TRG2 = 26%, TRG3 = 24%, TRG4 = 30%, TRG5 = 2%; and Cologne Regression Scale: no tumour = 18%, 1-10% VTC = 27%, 10-50% VTC = 26% and >50% VTC = 29%. The Mandard and Cologne Regression classifications showed better prognostic differentiation for the subgroups than the ypT category. The four-tiered Cologne Regression system had a good prognostic relevance. Comparing results of the re-evaluated Cologne Regression classification with the classification by routine pathological report showed very good inter-rater agreement, with kappa value 0.891. Compared to the original primary tumour, the tumour regression grading system using the percentage of residual vital tumour has prognostic relevance.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30636069
doi: 10.1111/his.13811
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

731-743

Informations de copyright

© 2019 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Auteurs

Katharina Puetz (K)

Institute of Pathology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.

Elfriede Bollschweiler (E)

Department of General, Visceral and Cancer Surgery, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Center for Esophageal and Gastric Surgery, AGAPLESION Markuskrankenhaus, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.

Robert Semrau (R)

Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.

Stefan P Mönig (SP)

Department of General, Visceral and Cancer Surgery, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Service de Chirurgie viscérale Hôpitaux, Universitaires de Genève, Geneva, Switzerland.

Arnulf H Hölscher (AH)

Department of General, Visceral and Cancer Surgery, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Center for Esophageal and Gastric Surgery, AGAPLESION Markuskrankenhaus, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.

Uta Drebber (U)

Institute of Pathology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH