Neoadjuvant chemoradiation for patients with advanced oesophageal cancer - which response grading system best impacts prognostic discrimination?
Adenocarcinoma
/ mortality
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Chemoradiotherapy, Adjuvant
/ standards
Esophageal Neoplasms
/ mortality
Esophagectomy
Esophagus
/ pathology
Female
Fibrosis
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Kaplan-Meier Estimate
Male
Middle Aged
Multivariate Analysis
Neoadjuvant Therapy
/ standards
Neoplasm Grading
Neoplasm Invasiveness
Neoplasm, Residual
Prognosis
Proportional Hazards Models
Retrospective Studies
Survival Rate
Treatment Outcome
adenocarcinoma
neoadjuvant chemoradiation
oesophageal cancer
regression grading
squamous cell carcinoma
Journal
Histopathology
ISSN: 1365-2559
Titre abrégé: Histopathology
Pays: England
ID NLM: 7704136
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Apr 2019
Apr 2019
Historique:
received:
24
08
2018
accepted:
19
12
2018
pubmed:
13
1
2019
medline:
31
7
2019
entrez:
13
1
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Neoadjuvant chemoradiation reduces tumour volume and improves the R0 resection rate, followed by extended survival for patients with advanced oesophageal cancer. The degree of tumour regression has high prognostic relevance. To date, there is still no generally accepted tumour regression grading system. The aim of this study was to compare the prognostic discrimination power of different histological regression grading systems: (i) the fibrosis/tumour ratio within the primary tumour (Mandard classification), (ii) the percentage of residual vital tumour cells (VTC) compared to the original primary tumour (Cologne Regression) and (iii) the ypT category, in patients with cT3 carcinoma of the oesophagus after neoadjuvant chemoradiation. This study included 216 patients with oesophageal cancer clinically staged as cT3NxM0 and treated from 2009 to 2012 with standardised chemoradiation followed by oesophagectomy [median age 62 years, 176 (81%) male and 138 (64%) adenocarcinoma patients]. The subgroup frequencies of the three classification systems were ypT category: ypT0 = 18%, ypT1 = 14%, ypT2 = 23%, ypT3 = 44%, ypT4 = 1%; Mandard classification: TRG1 = 18%, TRG2 = 26%, TRG3 = 24%, TRG4 = 30%, TRG5 = 2%; and Cologne Regression Scale: no tumour = 18%, 1-10% VTC = 27%, 10-50% VTC = 26% and >50% VTC = 29%. The Mandard and Cologne Regression classifications showed better prognostic differentiation for the subgroups than the ypT category. The four-tiered Cologne Regression system had a good prognostic relevance. Comparing results of the re-evaluated Cologne Regression classification with the classification by routine pathological report showed very good inter-rater agreement, with kappa value 0.891. Compared to the original primary tumour, the tumour regression grading system using the percentage of residual vital tumour has prognostic relevance.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
731-743Informations de copyright
© 2019 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.