Rapid automated liver quantitative susceptibility mapping.
in-phase echoes
liver iron overload
quantitative susceptibility mapping
water/fat separation
Journal
Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI
ISSN: 1522-2586
Titre abrégé: J Magn Reson Imaging
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9105850
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
09 2019
09 2019
Historique:
received:
15
05
2018
revised:
09
12
2018
accepted:
11
12
2018
pubmed:
15
1
2019
medline:
22
10
2020
entrez:
15
1
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Accurate measurement of the liver iron concentration (LIC) is needed to guide iron-chelating therapy for patients with transfusional iron overload. In this work, we investigate the feasibility of automated quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) to measure the LIC. To develop a rapid, robust, and automated liver QSM for clinical practice. Prospective. 13 healthy subjects and 22 patients. 1.5 T and 3 T/3D multiecho gradient-recalled echo (GRE) sequence. Data were acquired using a 3D GRE sequence with an out-of-phase echo spacing with respect to each other. All odd echoes that were in-phase (IP) were used to initialize the fat-water separation and field estimation (T IP and SPURS initialization methods in both healthy subjects and patients were compared using paired t-test and linear regression analysis to assess processing time and region of interest (ROI) measurements. Reproducibility of QSM, R Liver QSM using the IP method was found to be ~5.5 times faster than SPURS (P < 0.05) in initializing T Use of IP echo-based initialization enables robust water/fat separation and field estimation for automated, rapid, and reproducible liver QSM for clinical applications. 1 Technical Efficacy: Stage 2 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2019;50:725-732.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Accurate measurement of the liver iron concentration (LIC) is needed to guide iron-chelating therapy for patients with transfusional iron overload. In this work, we investigate the feasibility of automated quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) to measure the LIC.
PURPOSE
To develop a rapid, robust, and automated liver QSM for clinical practice.
STUDY TYPE
Prospective.
POPULATION
13 healthy subjects and 22 patients.
FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCES
1.5 T and 3 T/3D multiecho gradient-recalled echo (GRE) sequence.
ASSESSMENT
Data were acquired using a 3D GRE sequence with an out-of-phase echo spacing with respect to each other. All odd echoes that were in-phase (IP) were used to initialize the fat-water separation and field estimation (T
STATISTICAL TESTS
IP and SPURS initialization methods in both healthy subjects and patients were compared using paired t-test and linear regression analysis to assess processing time and region of interest (ROI) measurements. Reproducibility of QSM, R
RESULTS
Liver QSM using the IP method was found to be ~5.5 times faster than SPURS (P < 0.05) in initializing T
DATA CONCLUSION
Use of IP echo-based initialization enables robust water/fat separation and field estimation for automated, rapid, and reproducible liver QSM for clinical applications.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE
1 Technical Efficacy: Stage 2 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2019;50:725-732.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30637892
doi: 10.1002/jmri.26632
pmc: PMC6929208
mid: NIHMS1063503
doi:
Substances chimiques
Iron
E1UOL152H7
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
725-732Subventions
Organisme : NINDS NIH HHS
ID : R01 NS095562
Pays : United States
Organisme : NINDS NIH HHS
ID : R01 NS090464
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIDDK NIH HHS
ID : R01 DK116126
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : R01 CA181566
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
© 2019 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.
Références
Magn Reson Imaging. 2017 Jan;35:154-159
pubmed: 27587225
Mov Disord. 2016 Mar;31(3):317-24
pubmed: 26362242
Magn Reson Med. 2010 Jan;63(1):194-206
pubmed: 19953507
Magn Reson Med. 2012 Nov;68(5):1563-9
pubmed: 22851199
Radiographics. 2018 Mar-Apr;38(2):392-412
pubmed: 29528818
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2015 Feb;34(2):531-40
pubmed: 25312917
Radiology. 2015 Dec;277(3):813-25
pubmed: 26267831
Magn Reson Med. 1991 Apr;18(2):371-83
pubmed: 2046518
Magn Reson Med. 2015 Feb;73(2):843-50
pubmed: 24664497
Magn Reson Med. 2012 Sep;68(3):830-40
pubmed: 22161866
Magn Reson Med. 2015 Jan;73(1):82-101
pubmed: 25044035
Magn Reson Med. 2010 Jan;63(1):79-90
pubmed: 19859956
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2007 Oct;26(4):1153-61
pubmed: 17896369
Magn Reson Med. 2018 May;79(5):2795-2803
pubmed: 29023982
N Engl J Med. 2011 Jan 13;364(2):146-56
pubmed: 21226580
Magn Reson Med. 2018 Jan;79(1):121-128
pubmed: 28261863
Magn Reson Med. 1996 Oct;36(4):579-87
pubmed: 8892211
NMR Biomed. 2011 Nov;24(9):1129-36
pubmed: 21387445
Magn Reson Med. 2014 Nov;72(5):1353-65
pubmed: 24323332
Magn Reson Med. 2015 Oct;74(4):945-52
pubmed: 25263499
MAGMA. 2015 Aug;28(4):347-55
pubmed: 25408108
Diagn Interv Radiol. 2014 Jan-Feb;20(1):17-26
pubmed: 24047718
Magn Reson Med. 2013 Feb;69(2):467-76
pubmed: 22488774
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2017 Oct;46(4):951-971
pubmed: 28295954
Radiology. 2013 Oct;269(1):216-23
pubmed: 23674786
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2018 Oct;48(4):1069-1079
pubmed: 29566449