Childhood adversities, negative life events and outcomes of non-pharmacological treatments for depression in primary care: A secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial.
Adult
Adverse Childhood Experiences
/ statistics & numerical data
Cognitive Behavioral Therapy
Comorbidity
Depressive Disorder
/ epidemiology
Exercise Therapy
Female
Humans
Life Change Events
Male
Middle Aged
Outcome Assessment, Health Care
/ statistics & numerical data
Primary Health Care
Stress, Psychological
/ epidemiology
Sweden
/ epidemiology
Childhood adversities
Depressive disorder
Non-pharmacological treatment
Primary care
Recent life events
Treatment outcome
Journal
Journal of psychiatric research
ISSN: 1879-1379
Titre abrégé: J Psychiatr Res
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0376331
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
03 2019
03 2019
Historique:
received:
01
08
2018
revised:
19
12
2018
accepted:
03
01
2019
pubmed:
15
1
2019
medline:
31
3
2020
entrez:
15
1
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Non-pharmacological treatments for depression are effective and available in primary care, but useful prognostic factors are lacking. Childhood adversities (CA) and negative recent life events (RLE) increase the risk and severity of depression, though their effect on treatment outcomes remains understudied. Using a sample of 737 adult participants of a multicenter randomized controlled trial receiving physical exercise, internet based cognitive-behavioral therapy or treatment as usual, alone or in combination with antidepressants, this prospective study aimed to determine the impact of CA, RLE and their interaction as predictors of outcomes of non-pharmacological treatments for mild-moderate depression in primary care. Outcomes were depression severity (MADRS score) and response to treatment (≥50% reduction in MADRS score) after three months. Linear regression and modified Poisson regression were used, interaction was assessed with a product term (CA*RLE) and epidemiological measures of interaction. The number of CA and RLE were associated with higher depression severity at follow-up (CA: β = 0.79, 95% CI: 0.14 to 1.44 and RLE: β = 0.52, 95% CI: 0.14 to 0.72) and showed a trend towards lower rates of response to treatment (RR = 0.94, 95% CI: 0.86 to 1.03; and RLE: RR = 0.95, 95% CI: 0.90 to 0.99). Interaction between CA and RLE was not significant for depression severity (β = 0.10, 95% CI: -2.12 to 0.41) nor for response to treatment (RERI = -0.05, 95% CI = -0.33 to 0.24). CA and RLE are associated with worse outcomes of non-pharmacological treatments in primary care. Further studies to identify predictors of outcomes of non-pharmaological treatments for depression are needed.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30641348
pii: S0022-3956(18)30909-9
doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2019.01.004
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
152-158Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.