Gonadotrophins for ovulation induction in women with polycystic ovary syndrome.
Abortion, Spontaneous
/ epidemiology
Birth Rate
Clomiphene
/ therapeutic use
Drug Resistance
Female
Fertility Agents, Female
/ therapeutic use
Follicle Stimulating Hormone
/ therapeutic use
Gonadotropins
/ therapeutic use
Humans
Live Birth
/ epidemiology
Menotropins
/ therapeutic use
Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome
/ chemically induced
Ovulation Induction
/ methods
Polycystic Ovary Syndrome
/ drug therapy
Pregnancy
Pregnancy, Multiple
/ statistics & numerical data
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
Journal
The Cochrane database of systematic reviews
ISSN: 1469-493X
Titre abrégé: Cochrane Database Syst Rev
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100909747
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
16 01 2019
16 01 2019
Historique:
pubmed:
17
1
2019
medline:
11
4
2019
entrez:
17
1
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Ovulation induction with follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) is a second-line treatment in women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) who do not ovulate or conceive on clomiphene citrate. To compare the effectiveness and safety of gonadotrophins as a second-line treatment for ovulation induction in women with clomiphene citrate-resistant polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS), and women who do not ovulate or conceive after clomiphene citrate. In January 2018, we searched the Cochrane Gynaecology and Fertility Group Specialised Register of Controlled Trials, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, the World Health Organisation clinical trials register, Clinicaltrials.gov, LILACs, and PubMed databases, and Google Scholar. We checked references of in all obtained studies. We had no language restrictions. All randomised controlled trials reporting data on clinical outcomes in women with PCOS who did not ovulate or conceive on clomiphene citrate, and undergoing ovulation induction with urinary-derived gonadotrophins, including urofollitropin (uFSH) in purified FSH (FSH-P) or highly purified FSH (FSH-HP) form, human menopausal gonadotropin (HMG) and highly purified human menopausal gonadotrophin (HP-HMG), or recombinant FSH (rFSH), or continuing clomiphene citrate. We included trials reporting on ovulation induction followed by intercourse or intrauterine insemination. We excluded studies that described co-treatment with clomiphene citrate, metformin, luteinizing hormone, or letrozole. Three review authors (NW, EK, and MvW) independently selected studies for inclusion, assessed risk of bias, and extracted study data. Primary outcomes were live birth rate per woman and multiple pregnancy per woman. Secondary outcomes were clinical pregnancy, miscarriage, incidence of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) per woman, total gonadotrophin dose, and total duration of stimulation per woman. We combined data using a fixed-effect model to calculate the risk ratio (RR). We summarised the overall quality of evidence for the main outcomes using GRADE criteria. The review included 15 trials with 2387 women. Ten trials compared rFSH with urinary-derived gonadotrophins (three compared rFSH with human menopausal gonadotrophin, and seven compared rFSH with FSH-HP), four trials compared FSH-P with HMG. We found no trials that compared FSH-HP with FSH-P. One trial compared FSH with continued clomiphene citrate.Recombinant FSH (rFSH) versus urinary-derived gonadotrophinsThere may be little or no difference in the birth rate between rFSH and urinary-derived gonadotrophins (RR 1.21, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.83 to 1.78; five trials, N = 505; I² = 9%; low-quality evidence). This suggests that for the observed average live birth per woman who used urinary-derived FSH of 16%, the chance of live birth with rFSH is between 13% and 28%. There may also be little or no difference between groups in incidence of multiple pregnancy (RR 0.86, 95% CI 0.46 to 1.61; eight trials, N = 1368; I² = 0%; low-quality evidence), clinical pregnancy rate (RR 1.05, 95% CI 0.88 to 1.27; eight trials, N = 1330; I² = 0; low-quality evidence), or miscarriage rate (RR 1.20, 95% CI 0.71 to 2.04; seven trials, N = 970; I² = 0; low-quality evidence). We are uncertain whether rFSH reduces the incidence of OHSS (RR 1.48, 95% CI 0.82 to 2.65, ten trials, n=1565, I² = 0%, very low-quality evidence).Human menopausal gonadotrophin (HMG) or HP-HMG versus uFSHWhen compared to uFSH, we are uncertain whether HMG or HP-HMG improves live birth rate (RR 1.28, 95% CI 0.65 to 2.52; three trials, N = 138; I² = 0%; very low quality evidence), or reduces multiple pregnancy rate (RR 2.13, 95% CI 0.51 to 8.91; four trials, N = 161; I² = 0%; very low quality evidence). We are also uncertain whether HMG or HP-HMG improves clinical pregnancy rate (RR 1.31, 95% CI 0.66 to 2.59; three trials, N = 102; I² = 0; very low quality evidence), reduces miscarriage rate (RR 0.33, 95% CI 0.06 to 1.97; two trials, N = 98; I² = 0%; very low quality evidence), or reduces the incidence of OHSS (RR 7.07, 95% CI 0.42 to 117.81; two trials, N = 53; very low quality evidence) when compared to uFSH.Gonadotrophins versus continued clomiphene citrateGonadotrophins resulted in more live births than continued clomiphene citrate (RR 1.24, 95% CI 1.05 to 1.46; one trial, N = 661; I² = 0%; moderate-quality evidence). This suggests that for a woman with a live birth rate of 41% with continued clomiphene citrate, the live birth rate with FSH was between 43% and 60%. There is probably little or no difference in the incidence of multiple pregnancy between treatments (RR 0.89, 95% CI 0.33 to 2.44; one trial, N = 661; I² = 0%; moderate-quality evidence). Gonadotrophins resulted in more clinical pregnancies than continued clomiphene citrate (RR 1.31, 95% CI 1.13 to 1.52; one trial, N = 661; I² = 0%; moderate-quality evidence), and more miscarriages (RR 2.23, 95% CI 1.11 to 4.47; one trial, N = 661; I² = 0%; moderate-quality evidence). None of the women developed OHSS. There may be little or no difference in live birth, incidence of multiple pregnancy, clinical pregnancy rate, or miscarriage rate between urinary-derived gonadotrophins and recombinant follicle stimulating hormone in women with polycystic ovary syndrome. For human menopausal gonadotropin or highly purified human menopausal gonadotrophin versus urinary follicle stimulating hormone we are uncertain whether one or the other improves or lowers live birth, incidence of multiple pregnancy, clinical pregnancy rate, or miscarriage rate. We are uncertain whether any of the interventions reduce the incidence of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. We suggest weighing costs and convenience in the decision to use one or the other gonadotrophin. In women with clomiphene citrate failure, gonadotrophins resulted in more live births than continued clomiphene citrate without increasing multiple pregnancies.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Ovulation induction with follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) is a second-line treatment in women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) who do not ovulate or conceive on clomiphene citrate.
OBJECTIVES
To compare the effectiveness and safety of gonadotrophins as a second-line treatment for ovulation induction in women with clomiphene citrate-resistant polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS), and women who do not ovulate or conceive after clomiphene citrate.
SEARCH METHODS
In January 2018, we searched the Cochrane Gynaecology and Fertility Group Specialised Register of Controlled Trials, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, the World Health Organisation clinical trials register, Clinicaltrials.gov, LILACs, and PubMed databases, and Google Scholar. We checked references of in all obtained studies. We had no language restrictions.
SELECTION CRITERIA
All randomised controlled trials reporting data on clinical outcomes in women with PCOS who did not ovulate or conceive on clomiphene citrate, and undergoing ovulation induction with urinary-derived gonadotrophins, including urofollitropin (uFSH) in purified FSH (FSH-P) or highly purified FSH (FSH-HP) form, human menopausal gonadotropin (HMG) and highly purified human menopausal gonadotrophin (HP-HMG), or recombinant FSH (rFSH), or continuing clomiphene citrate. We included trials reporting on ovulation induction followed by intercourse or intrauterine insemination. We excluded studies that described co-treatment with clomiphene citrate, metformin, luteinizing hormone, or letrozole.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Three review authors (NW, EK, and MvW) independently selected studies for inclusion, assessed risk of bias, and extracted study data. Primary outcomes were live birth rate per woman and multiple pregnancy per woman. Secondary outcomes were clinical pregnancy, miscarriage, incidence of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) per woman, total gonadotrophin dose, and total duration of stimulation per woman. We combined data using a fixed-effect model to calculate the risk ratio (RR). We summarised the overall quality of evidence for the main outcomes using GRADE criteria.
MAIN RESULTS
The review included 15 trials with 2387 women. Ten trials compared rFSH with urinary-derived gonadotrophins (three compared rFSH with human menopausal gonadotrophin, and seven compared rFSH with FSH-HP), four trials compared FSH-P with HMG. We found no trials that compared FSH-HP with FSH-P. One trial compared FSH with continued clomiphene citrate.Recombinant FSH (rFSH) versus urinary-derived gonadotrophinsThere may be little or no difference in the birth rate between rFSH and urinary-derived gonadotrophins (RR 1.21, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.83 to 1.78; five trials, N = 505; I² = 9%; low-quality evidence). This suggests that for the observed average live birth per woman who used urinary-derived FSH of 16%, the chance of live birth with rFSH is between 13% and 28%. There may also be little or no difference between groups in incidence of multiple pregnancy (RR 0.86, 95% CI 0.46 to 1.61; eight trials, N = 1368; I² = 0%; low-quality evidence), clinical pregnancy rate (RR 1.05, 95% CI 0.88 to 1.27; eight trials, N = 1330; I² = 0; low-quality evidence), or miscarriage rate (RR 1.20, 95% CI 0.71 to 2.04; seven trials, N = 970; I² = 0; low-quality evidence). We are uncertain whether rFSH reduces the incidence of OHSS (RR 1.48, 95% CI 0.82 to 2.65, ten trials, n=1565, I² = 0%, very low-quality evidence).Human menopausal gonadotrophin (HMG) or HP-HMG versus uFSHWhen compared to uFSH, we are uncertain whether HMG or HP-HMG improves live birth rate (RR 1.28, 95% CI 0.65 to 2.52; three trials, N = 138; I² = 0%; very low quality evidence), or reduces multiple pregnancy rate (RR 2.13, 95% CI 0.51 to 8.91; four trials, N = 161; I² = 0%; very low quality evidence). We are also uncertain whether HMG or HP-HMG improves clinical pregnancy rate (RR 1.31, 95% CI 0.66 to 2.59; three trials, N = 102; I² = 0; very low quality evidence), reduces miscarriage rate (RR 0.33, 95% CI 0.06 to 1.97; two trials, N = 98; I² = 0%; very low quality evidence), or reduces the incidence of OHSS (RR 7.07, 95% CI 0.42 to 117.81; two trials, N = 53; very low quality evidence) when compared to uFSH.Gonadotrophins versus continued clomiphene citrateGonadotrophins resulted in more live births than continued clomiphene citrate (RR 1.24, 95% CI 1.05 to 1.46; one trial, N = 661; I² = 0%; moderate-quality evidence). This suggests that for a woman with a live birth rate of 41% with continued clomiphene citrate, the live birth rate with FSH was between 43% and 60%. There is probably little or no difference in the incidence of multiple pregnancy between treatments (RR 0.89, 95% CI 0.33 to 2.44; one trial, N = 661; I² = 0%; moderate-quality evidence). Gonadotrophins resulted in more clinical pregnancies than continued clomiphene citrate (RR 1.31, 95% CI 1.13 to 1.52; one trial, N = 661; I² = 0%; moderate-quality evidence), and more miscarriages (RR 2.23, 95% CI 1.11 to 4.47; one trial, N = 661; I² = 0%; moderate-quality evidence). None of the women developed OHSS.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
There may be little or no difference in live birth, incidence of multiple pregnancy, clinical pregnancy rate, or miscarriage rate between urinary-derived gonadotrophins and recombinant follicle stimulating hormone in women with polycystic ovary syndrome. For human menopausal gonadotropin or highly purified human menopausal gonadotrophin versus urinary follicle stimulating hormone we are uncertain whether one or the other improves or lowers live birth, incidence of multiple pregnancy, clinical pregnancy rate, or miscarriage rate. We are uncertain whether any of the interventions reduce the incidence of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. We suggest weighing costs and convenience in the decision to use one or the other gonadotrophin. In women with clomiphene citrate failure, gonadotrophins resulted in more live births than continued clomiphene citrate without increasing multiple pregnancies.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30648738
doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010290.pub3
pmc: PMC6353048
doi:
Substances chimiques
Fertility Agents, Female
0
Gonadotropins
0
Clomiphene
1HRS458QU2
Menotropins
61489-71-2
Follicle Stimulating Hormone
9002-68-0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Meta-Analysis
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Systematic Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
CD010290Commentaires et corrections
Type : UpdateOf
Références
Mol Hum Reprod. 1996 May;2(5):361-9
pubmed: 9238704
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Jun 13;(6):CD001122
pubmed: 22696324
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Aug 24;(8):CD000410
pubmed: 26299777
Lancet. 2018 Feb 24;391(10122):758-765
pubmed: 29273245
BMJ. 2017 Jan 31;356:j138
pubmed: 28143834
Fertil Steril. 1998 Jan;69(1):19-25
pubmed: 9457926
Fertil Steril. 1991 Jan;55(1):56-60
pubmed: 1898891
J Biol Chem. 1989 Mar 25;264(9):4769-75
pubmed: 2494176
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 May 24;5:CD010287
pubmed: 29797697
Obstet Gynecol Surv. 1989 Jun;44(6):430-40
pubmed: 2660037
Eur J Biochem. 1990 Oct 5;193(1):263-71
pubmed: 2121479
Hum Reprod. 2006 Jul;21(7):1798-804
pubmed: 16571641
Fertil Steril. 1985 May;43(5):703-8
pubmed: 3922800
Reprod Biomed Online. 2004 Nov;9(5):494-9
pubmed: 15588465
Int J Womens Health. 2010 Aug 09;1:205-11
pubmed: 21072289
Reprod Biomed Online. 2004 Aug;9(2):231-6
pubmed: 15333258
Fertil Steril. 2004 Jan;81(1):19-25
pubmed: 14711538
J Endocrinol. 1990 Apr;125(1):3-14
pubmed: 2187048
Biochem J. 1992 Nov 1;287 ( Pt 3):665-79
pubmed: 1445230
Hum Reprod. 2004 Jan;19(1):41-7
pubmed: 14688154
Fertil Steril. 1990 Mar;53(3):426-31
pubmed: 2106449
Gynecol Endocrinol. 2004 Jan;18(1):17-22
pubmed: 15106360
Hum Reprod. 1996 Sep;11 Suppl 1:95-107; discussion 117-9
pubmed: 8968783
Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2013 Jul 5;373(1-2):77-82
pubmed: 23084977
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2001;(2):CD002121
pubmed: 11406034
Hum Reprod Update. 1996 Mar-Apr;2(2):172-91
pubmed: 9079412
Hum Reprod. 1990 Jan;5(1):32-5
pubmed: 2108981
Hum Reprod. 2007 Jul;22(7):1816-23
pubmed: 17449511
Hum Reprod. 1996 Aug;11(8):1632-4
pubmed: 8921106
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Sep 09;(9):CD010290
pubmed: 26350625
Hum Reprod. 1995 Jul;10(7):1928-35
pubmed: 8583012
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1958 Dec;18(12):1333-48
pubmed: 13611018
Hum Reprod. 1999 Jun;14(6):1418-20
pubmed: 10357950
BMJ. 2003 May 31;326(7400):1167-70
pubmed: 12775614
Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2006 Jul 18;4:38
pubmed: 16848893
Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 1980 Feb;12(2):177-207
pubmed: 6772357
Hum Reprod. 2004 Apr;19(4):838-48
pubmed: 15016779
Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2015 Jul 23;:
pubmed: 26228499
Reprod Med Biol. 2010 Feb 23;9(2):99-106
pubmed: 29699333
Fertil Steril. 1990 May;53(5):792-7
pubmed: 2110070
Hum Reprod. 2003 May;18(5):1000-4
pubmed: 12721176
Acta Endocrinol Suppl (Copenh). 1988;288:20-7
pubmed: 3138864
Hum Reprod. 1994 Oct;9(10):1845-8
pubmed: 7844213
Biochim Biophys Acta. 1988 Jun 9;947(2):287-306
pubmed: 3130893
Rass Clin Ter. 1960 Oct-Dec;59:213-6
pubmed: 13764333
Fertil Steril. 1999 Aug;72(2):276-81
pubmed: 10438995
Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 1990 Nov;33(5):585-92
pubmed: 2123759
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1986 Aug 9;293(6543):355-9
pubmed: 3089520
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2016 Apr 25;51(4):258-63
pubmed: 27116983
BMJ. 2003 Sep 6;327(7414):557-60
pubmed: 12958120
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Oct 31;(10):CD008046
pubmed: 25358904