Total hip arthroplasty using stem-first technique with navigation: the potential of achievement of the optimal combined anteversion being a risk factor for anterior cup protrusion.
Acetabulum
/ diagnostic imaging
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip
/ methods
Female
Femur Head
/ diagnostic imaging
Hip Prosthesis
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Osteoarthritis, Hip
/ diagnostic imaging
Osteonecrosis
/ diagnostic imaging
Postoperative Complications
Prosthesis Fitting
Retrospective Studies
Risk Factors
Surgery, Computer-Assisted
/ methods
Tomography, Spiral Computed
Young Adult
Combined anteversion
Cup protrusion
Imageless navigation
Stem-first THA
Journal
European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie
ISSN: 1432-1068
Titre abrégé: Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol
Pays: France
ID NLM: 9518037
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
May 2019
May 2019
Historique:
received:
16
10
2018
accepted:
10
01
2019
pubmed:
19
1
2019
medline:
4
12
2019
entrez:
19
1
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
In the combined anteversion (CA) technique for total hip arthroplasty (THA) with a cementless stem, cup anteversion is strongly influenced by the native femoral anteversion. It is hypothesized that in cases with large native femoral anteversion, cup anteversion can be decreased, and anterior cup protrusion from the anterior edge of the acetabulum could occur due to the achievement of optimal CA. In this study, the accuracy of CA in THA with the CA technique using imageless navigation and the relationship between the protrusion of the anterior edge of cup and optimum CA was retrospectively evaluated. Ninety-seven patients (104 hips) who underwent primary THA by the CA technique using image-free navigation were enrolled in the study. The femoral stem was placed following the individual femoral anteversion so that the target cup anteversion could be determined following a mathematical formula (37 = femoral stem anteversion × 0.7 + cup anteversion). Results The resulting CA values effectively achieved accurate CA with 39.49 ± 5.03° postoperatively. On the other hand, anterior cup protrusion was measured by computed tomography image. A cup protrusion length of more than 3 mm was indicated for 60 cases (57.7%). All included patients were divided into two groups: Group 1 as protrusion positive and Group 2 as protrusion negative. In Group 1, preoperative femoral anteversion and postoperative stem anteversion were significantly higher, while postoperative cup anteversion was significantly lower. However, the postoperative CA value indicated no significant difference between the groups. The CA (stem-first) technique with image-free navigated THA could effectively achieve accurate CA. On the other hand, a large number of cases revealed anterior cup protrusion due to the low cup anteversion.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30656429
doi: 10.1007/s00590-019-02383-w
pii: 10.1007/s00590-019-02383-w
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
807-812Références
J Arthroplasty. 2002 Apr;17(3):282-8
pubmed: 11938502
J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2003 Mar-Apr;27(2):183-8
pubmed: 12703010
J Arthroplasty. 2003 Apr;18(3):387-8
pubmed: 12728436
J Orthop Res. 2004 Jul;22(4):815-21
pubmed: 15183439
J Biomech. 2006;39(7):1315-23
pubmed: 15894324
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005 Jun;87(6):762-9
pubmed: 15911655
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007 Aug;89(8):1031-5
pubmed: 17785740
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1948 Jul;30A(3):745-51
pubmed: 18109784
J Arthroplasty. 2008 Oct;23(7):1068-70
pubmed: 18534533
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009 Jan;467(1):119-27
pubmed: 18979146
J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2009 Jun;17(6):337-44
pubmed: 19474443
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2012 Feb;94(2):145-51
pubmed: 22323676
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012 Nov;470(11):3054-9
pubmed: 22569720
J Arthroplasty. 2014 Apr;29(4):753-6
pubmed: 23927907
Int Orthop. 2014 Jan;38(1):27-32
pubmed: 24026219
Bone Joint J. 2014 Dec;96-B(12):1586-93
pubmed: 25452359
Int Orthop. 2016 Jan;40(1):9-13
pubmed: 25947898
Int Orthop. 2016 Sep;40(9):1807-12
pubmed: 26611727
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Jan;475(1):196-203
pubmed: 27604584
J Arthroplasty. 2018 Oct;33(10):3288-3296.e1
pubmed: 29895480
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1978 Mar;60(2):217-20
pubmed: 641088
J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1998 Jul-Aug;22(4):610-4
pubmed: 9676454
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1998 Jul;80(4):711-9
pubmed: 9699842