Use of archival versus newly collected tumor samples for assessing PD-L1 expression and overall survival: an updated analysis of KEYNOTE-010 trial.
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized
/ administration & dosage
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols
/ therapeutic use
B7-H1 Antigen
/ metabolism
Biopsy
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung
/ drug therapy
Carcinoma, Squamous Cell
/ drug therapy
Docetaxel
/ administration & dosage
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
International Agencies
Lung Neoplasms
/ drug therapy
Male
Middle Aged
Paraffin Embedding
Prognosis
Specimen Handling
/ methods
Survival Rate
Young Adult
PD-L1 expression
pembrolizumab
tumor samples
Journal
Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology
ISSN: 1569-8041
Titre abrégé: Ann Oncol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9007735
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 02 2019
01 02 2019
Historique:
pubmed:
19
1
2019
medline:
5
3
2020
entrez:
19
1
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
In KEYNOTE-010, pembrolizumab versus docetaxel improved overall survival (OS) in patients with programmed death-1 protein (PD)-L1-positive advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). A prespecified exploratory analysis compared outcomes in patients based on PD-L1 expression in archival versus newly collected tumor samples using recently updated survival data. PD-L1 was assessed centrally by immunohistochemistry (22C3 antibody) in archival or newly collected tumor samples. Patients received pembrolizumab 2 or 10 mg/kg Q3W or docetaxel 75 mg/m2 Q3W for 24 months or until progression/intolerable toxicity/other reason. Response was assessed by RECIST v1.1 every 9 weeks, survival every 2 months. Primary end points were OS and progression-free survival (PFS) in tumor proportion score (TPS) ≥50% and ≥1%; pembrolizumab doses were pooled in this analysis. At date cut-off of 24 March 2017, median follow-up was 31 months (range 23-41) representing 18 additional months of follow-up from the primary analysis. Pembrolizumab versus docetaxel continued to improve OS in patients with previously treated, PD-L1-expressing advanced NSCLC; hazard ratio (HR) was 0.66 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.57, 0.77]. Of 1033 patients analyzed, 455(44%) were enrolled based on archival samples and 578 (56%) on newly collected tumor samples. Approximately 40% of archival samples and 45% of newly collected tumor samples were PD-L1 TPS ≥50%. For TPS ≥50%, the OS HRs were 0.64 (95% CI: 0.45, 0.91) and 0.40 (95% CI: 0.28, 0.56) for archival and newly collected samples, respectively. In patients with TPS ≥1%, OS HRs were 0.74 (95% CI: 0.59, 0.93) and 0.59 (95% CI: 0.48, 0.73) for archival and newly collected samples, respectively. In TPS ≥50%, PFS HRs were similar across archival [0.63 (95% CI: 0.45, 0.89)] and newly collected samples [0.53 (95% CI: 0.38, 0.72)]. In patients with TPS ≥1%, PFS HRs were similar across archival [0.82 (95% CI: 0.66, 1.02)] and newly collected samples [0.83 (95% CI: 0.68, 1.02)]. Pembrolizumab continued to improve OS over docetaxel in intention to treat population and in subsets of patients with newly collected and archival samples. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01905657.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
In KEYNOTE-010, pembrolizumab versus docetaxel improved overall survival (OS) in patients with programmed death-1 protein (PD)-L1-positive advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). A prespecified exploratory analysis compared outcomes in patients based on PD-L1 expression in archival versus newly collected tumor samples using recently updated survival data.
PATIENTS AND METHODS
PD-L1 was assessed centrally by immunohistochemistry (22C3 antibody) in archival or newly collected tumor samples. Patients received pembrolizumab 2 or 10 mg/kg Q3W or docetaxel 75 mg/m2 Q3W for 24 months or until progression/intolerable toxicity/other reason. Response was assessed by RECIST v1.1 every 9 weeks, survival every 2 months. Primary end points were OS and progression-free survival (PFS) in tumor proportion score (TPS) ≥50% and ≥1%; pembrolizumab doses were pooled in this analysis.
RESULTS
At date cut-off of 24 March 2017, median follow-up was 31 months (range 23-41) representing 18 additional months of follow-up from the primary analysis. Pembrolizumab versus docetaxel continued to improve OS in patients with previously treated, PD-L1-expressing advanced NSCLC; hazard ratio (HR) was 0.66 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.57, 0.77]. Of 1033 patients analyzed, 455(44%) were enrolled based on archival samples and 578 (56%) on newly collected tumor samples. Approximately 40% of archival samples and 45% of newly collected tumor samples were PD-L1 TPS ≥50%. For TPS ≥50%, the OS HRs were 0.64 (95% CI: 0.45, 0.91) and 0.40 (95% CI: 0.28, 0.56) for archival and newly collected samples, respectively. In patients with TPS ≥1%, OS HRs were 0.74 (95% CI: 0.59, 0.93) and 0.59 (95% CI: 0.48, 0.73) for archival and newly collected samples, respectively. In TPS ≥50%, PFS HRs were similar across archival [0.63 (95% CI: 0.45, 0.89)] and newly collected samples [0.53 (95% CI: 0.38, 0.72)]. In patients with TPS ≥1%, PFS HRs were similar across archival [0.82 (95% CI: 0.66, 1.02)] and newly collected samples [0.83 (95% CI: 0.68, 1.02)].
CONCLUSION
Pembrolizumab continued to improve OS over docetaxel in intention to treat population and in subsets of patients with newly collected and archival samples.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01905657.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30657853
pii: S0923-7534(19)31040-3
doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdy545
pmc: PMC6931268
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized
0
B7-H1 Antigen
0
CD274 protein, human
0
Docetaxel
15H5577CQD
pembrolizumab
DPT0O3T46P
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT01905657']
Types de publication
Clinical Trial, Phase II
Clinical Trial, Phase III
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
281-289Subventions
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : P50 CA196530
Pays : United States
Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society for Medical Oncology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.
Références
Eur J Cancer. 2009 Jan;45(2):228-47
pubmed: 19097774
Sci Transl Med. 2012 Mar 28;4(127):127ra37
pubmed: 22461641
Sci Rep. 2016 Jan 29;6:20090
pubmed: 26822379
N Engl J Med. 2015 May 21;372(21):2018-28
pubmed: 25891174
Mod Pathol. 2017 Mar;30(3):340-349
pubmed: 27834350
Lancet. 2014 Aug 23;384(9944):665-73
pubmed: 24933332
Blood. 2007 Jul 1;110(1):296-304
pubmed: 17363736
J Thorac Oncol. 2017 Feb;12(2):208-222
pubmed: 27913228
Lancet. 2016 Apr 9;387(10027):1540-1550
pubmed: 26712084
Clin Lung Cancer. 2017 Nov;18(6):e473-e479
pubmed: 28669849
N Engl J Med. 2015 Oct 22;373(17):1627-39
pubmed: 26412456
Blood. 2010 Aug 19;116(7):1124-31
pubmed: 20472834
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2016 Aug 23;140(11):1243-1249
pubmed: 27552095