Stopping Denosumab.
Denosumab discontinuation
Osteoporosis
Rebound effect
Spontaneous multiple vertebral fractures
Journal
Current osteoporosis reports
ISSN: 1544-2241
Titre abrégé: Curr Osteoporos Rep
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101176492
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
02 2019
02 2019
Historique:
pubmed:
20
1
2019
medline:
26
3
2020
entrez:
20
1
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Denosumab discontinuation is associated with a rebound effect manifesting by an increased risk of multiple spontaneous vertebral fractures. The purpose of this review is to (1) better characterize this risk and (2) find solutions to avoid it. In the absence of a potent bisphosphonate prescription at denosumab discontinuation, the frequency of multiple vertebral fractures is common or frequent (≥ 1/100 and < 1/10). In five recent case series, the median number of vertebral fractures was 5 within 7 to 20 months (median 11) after the last denosumab injection. Prescribing bisphosphonate before starting denosumab and/or after stopping denosumab may reduce this risk. However, only small case series have evaluated these strategies. After the second denosumab dose, there is a rebound effect with an increased risk of multiple vertebral fractures. A potent bisphosphonate prescribed at denosumab discontinuation could reduce this risk. As denosumab discontinuation is characterized by many uncertainties, denosumab is a second-line treatment for osteoporosis. Studies are urgently needed to define the management of denosumab discontinuation.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30659428
doi: 10.1007/s11914-019-00502-4
pii: 10.1007/s11914-019-00502-4
doi:
Substances chimiques
Bone Density Conservation Agents
0
Diphosphonates
0
Denosumab
4EQZ6YO2HI
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
8-15Commentaires et corrections
Type : ErratumIn
Références
Osteoporos Int. 2017 Apr;28(4):1355-1363
pubmed: 28058444
Joint Bone Spine. 2018 Oct;85(5):515-517
pubmed: 29317292
Osteoporos Int. 2016 May;27(5):1917-21
pubmed: 26694598
Bone. 2017 May;98:54-58
pubmed: 28286299
N Engl J Med. 2006 Feb 23;354(8):821-31
pubmed: 16495394
Eur J Endocrinol. 2017 Jun;176(6):677-683
pubmed: 28283537
Calcif Tissue Int. 2018 Jul;103(1):1-4
pubmed: 29926143
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2017 Feb 1;102(2):354-358
pubmed: 27732330
Osteoporos Int. 2018 Jan;29(1):41-47
pubmed: 28975362
Calcif Tissue Int. 2018 Jul;103(1):44-49
pubmed: 29396698
Calcif Tissue Int. 2018 Jul;103(1):50-54
pubmed: 29380013
J Bone Miner Res. 2005 Jan;20(1):141-51
pubmed: 15619680
Osteoporos Int. 2017 Sep;28(9):2701-2705
pubmed: 28540505
J Bone Miner Res. 2018 Mar;33(3):547
pubmed: 29393984
J Bone Miner Res. 2004 Jul;19(7):1059-66
pubmed: 15176987
Calcif Tissue Int. 2018 Jul;103(1):55-61
pubmed: 29445836
Bone. 2017 Dec;105:11-17
pubmed: 28789921
J Bone Miner Res. 2018 Feb;33(2):190-198
pubmed: 29105841
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011 Apr;96(4):972-80
pubmed: 21289258
N Engl J Med. 2002 Feb 28;346(9):653-61
pubmed: 11870242
Lancet. 2015 Aug 1;386(9992):433-43
pubmed: 26040499
Osteoporos Int. 2017 Oct;28(10):3067-3068
pubmed: 28589418
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2002 Aug;87(8):3609-17
pubmed: 12161484
Lancet. 2015 Sep 19;386(9999):1147-55
pubmed: 26144908
Osteoporos Int. 2017 May;28(5):1723-1732
pubmed: 28144701
Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2017 Jul;5(7):513-523
pubmed: 28546097
N Engl J Med. 2009 Aug 20;361(8):756-65
pubmed: 19671655
Calcif Tissue Int. 2017 Oct;101(4):371-374
pubmed: 28500448
Osteoporos Int. 2016 May;27(5):1923-5
pubmed: 26510845
J Rheumatol. 2008 Mar;35(3):488-97
pubmed: 18260172
Swiss Med Wkly. 2017 Sep 05;147:w14484
pubmed: 28871570
Praxis (Bern 1994). 2018 Jun;107(12):649-654
pubmed: 29871576
Bone. 2008 Aug;43(2):222-9
pubmed: 18539106
J Bone Miner Res. 2017 Jun;32(6):1291-1296
pubmed: 28240371