The impact of human activities on Australian wildlife.
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2019
2019
Historique:
received:
18
10
2018
accepted:
16
12
2018
entrez:
24
1
2019
pubmed:
24
1
2019
medline:
19
9
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Increasing human population size and the concomitant expansion of urbanisation significantly impact natural ecosystems and native fauna globally. Successful conservation management relies on precise information on the factors associated with wildlife population decline, which are challenging to acquire from natural populations. Wildlife Rehabilitation Centres (WRC) provide a rich source of this information. However, few researchers have conducted large-scale longitudinal studies, with most focussing on narrow taxonomic ranges, suggesting that WRC-associated data remains an underutilised resource, and may provide a fuller understanding of the anthropogenic threats facing native fauna. We analysed admissions and outcomes data from a WRC in Queensland, Australia Zoo Wildlife Hospital, to determine the major factors driving admissions and morbidity of native animals in a region experiencing rapid and prolonged urban expansion. We studied 31,626 admissions of 83 different species of native birds, reptiles, amphibians, marsupials and eutherian mammals from 2006 to 2017. While marsupial admissions were highest (41.3%), admissions increased over time for all species and exhibited seasonal variation (highest in Spring to Summer), consistent with known breeding seasons. Causes for admission typically associated with human influenced activities were dominant and exhibited the highest mortality rates. Car strikes were the most common reason for admission (34.7%), with dog attacks (9.2%), entanglements (7.2%), and cat attacks (5.3%) also high. Admissions of orphaned young and overt signs of disease were significant at 24.6% and 9.7%, respectively. Mortality rates were highest following dog attacks (72.7%) and car strikes (69.1%) and lowest in orphaned animals (22.1%). Our results show that WRC databases offer rich opportunities for wildlife monitoring and provide quantification of the negative impacts of human activities on ecosystem stability and wildlife health. The imminent need for urgent, proactive conservation management to ameliorate the negative impacts of human activities on wildlife is clearly evident from our results.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30673712
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0206958
pii: PONE-D-18-30268
pmc: PMC6344025
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0206958Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
RB and AG are employees of the Australia Zoo Wildlife Hospital. ATB, EM, SMO, AP and GCC have no competing interests to declare.
Références
J Wildl Dis. 1991 Oct;27(4):657-60
pubmed: 1758032
Aust Vet J. 2015 Dec;93(12):466-70
pubmed: 26769072
J Small Anim Pract. 2014 Jun;55(6):293-300
pubmed: 24725160
J Wildl Dis. 2002 Jan;38(1):101-6
pubmed: 11838200
Environ Pollut. 2013 Mar;174:171-8
pubmed: 23262073
Conserv Biol. 2018 Feb;32(1):50-59
pubmed: 28328146
Animals (Basel). 2016 Sep 15;6(9):
pubmed: 27649249
Nat Commun. 2013;4:1396
pubmed: 23360987
J Wildl Dis. 2002 Oct;38(4):699-705
pubmed: 12528435
PLoS One. 2018 Mar 21;13(3):e0192731
pubmed: 29561864
Vet Microbiol. 2013 Aug 30;165(3-4):214-23
pubmed: 23523170
Science. 2002 May 3;296(5569):904-7
pubmed: 11988573
J Wildl Dis. 2015 Jul;51(3):712-8
pubmed: 26161722
J Wildl Dis. 2013 Jan;49(1):18-28
pubmed: 23307368
Vet Rec. 2013 Feb 23;172(8):211
pubmed: 23436601
BMC Ecol. 2017 Jun 26;17(1):24
pubmed: 28651557
Vet Microbiol. 2011 Jul 5;151(1-2):205-8
pubmed: 21440385
BMC Vet Res. 2011 Oct 18;7:61
pubmed: 22008235
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2012 May;87(2):390-413
pubmed: 22051057
Aust Vet J. 2016 Apr;94(4):121-4
pubmed: 27021894
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2006 Jan 29;361(1465):163-71
pubmed: 16553315
PLoS One. 2013 Nov 21;8(11):e79967
pubmed: 24278226
Syst Appl Microbiol. 2003 Jun;26(2):245-53
pubmed: 12866851
Nature. 2011 Mar 3;471(7336):51-7
pubmed: 21368823
Sci Rep. 2017 Feb 20;7:42587
pubmed: 28218272
Avian Pathol. 1992 Sep;21(3):503-7
pubmed: 18670965
J Environ Manage. 2012 Apr 30;97:1-5
pubmed: 22325576
Front Zool. 2014 May 27;11:48
pubmed: 24872836
Proc Biol Sci. 2007 Feb 7;274(1608):341-6
pubmed: 17164197
Biol Lett. 2016 Nov;12(11):
pubmed: 27881767
Ecohealth. 2013 Dec;10(4):446-54
pubmed: 24419670
Conserv Biol. 2008 Aug;22(4):897-911
pubmed: 18544093
PLoS One. 2011;6(9):e24603
pubmed: 21966362
PLoS One. 2015 Jul 24;10(7):e0133638
pubmed: 26207984
Proc Biol Sci. 2009 Sep 22;276(1671):3249-56
pubmed: 19535372
Sci Adv. 2015 Jun 19;1(5):e1400253
pubmed: 26601195
J Wildl Dis. 2002 Jan;38(1):84-92
pubmed: 11838233
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2013 Aug;88(3):537-49
pubmed: 23279382
PLoS One. 2017 May 5;12(5):e0177366
pubmed: 28475653
PLoS One. 2014 Mar 31;9(3):e93517
pubmed: 24686490
Geospat Health. 2015 Nov 26;10(2):321
pubmed: 26618306
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Apr 14;112(15):4531-40
pubmed: 25675493
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2015 May 5;370(1667):
pubmed: 25780244
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2002 Oct;969:34-8
pubmed: 12381560