Impact and sustainability of centralising acute stroke services in English metropolitan areas: retrospective analysis of hospital episode statistics and stroke national audit data.
Databases, Factual
Delivery of Health Care
/ organization & administration
Episode of Care
Evidence-Based Medicine
/ statistics & numerical data
Hospital Units
/ statistics & numerical data
Hospitals, Urban
/ statistics & numerical data
Humans
Length of Stay
/ statistics & numerical data
London
/ epidemiology
Mortality
/ trends
Program Evaluation
/ statistics & numerical data
Retrospective Studies
Stroke
/ mortality
Urban Health Services
/ organization & administration
Journal
BMJ (Clinical research ed.)
ISSN: 1756-1833
Titre abrégé: BMJ
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8900488
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
23 01 2019
23 01 2019
Historique:
entrez:
25
1
2019
pubmed:
25
1
2019
medline:
4
4
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
To investigate whether further centralisation of acute stroke services in Greater Manchester in 2015 was associated with changes in outcomes and whether the effects of centralisation of acute stroke services in London in 2010 were sustained. Retrospective analyses of patient level data from the Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) database linked to mortality data from the Office for National Statistics, and the Sentinel Stroke National Audit Programme (SSNAP). Acute stroke services in Greater Manchester and London, England. 509 182 stroke patients in HES living in urban areas admitted between January 2008 and March 2016; 218 120 stroke patients in SSNAP between April 2013 and March 2016. Hub and spoke models for acute stroke care. Mortality at 90 days after hospital admission; length of acute hospital stay; treatment in a hyperacute stroke unit; 19 evidence based clinical interventions. In Greater Manchester, borderline evidence suggested that risk adjusted mortality at 90 days declined overall; a significant decline in mortality was seen among patients treated at a hyperacute stroke unit (difference-in-differences -1.8% (95% confidence interval -3.4 to -0.2)), indicating 69 fewer deaths per year. A significant decline was seen in risk adjusted length of acute hospital stay overall (-1.5 (-2.5 to -0.4) days; P<0.01), indicating 6750 fewer bed days a year. The number of patients treated in a hyperacute stroke unit increased from 39% in 2010-12 to 86% in 2015/16. In London, the 90 day mortality rate was sustained (P>0.05), length of hospital stay declined (P<0.01), and more than 90% of patients were treated in a hyperacute stroke unit. Achievement of evidence based clinical interventions generally remained constant or improved in both areas. Centralised models of acute stroke care, in which all stroke patients receive hyperacute care, can reduce mortality and length of acute hospital stay and improve provision of evidence based clinical interventions. Effects can be sustained over time.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30674465
doi: 10.1136/bmj.l1
pmc: PMC6334718
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
l1Subventions
Organisme : Department of Health
ID : 10/1009/09
Pays : United Kingdom
Informations de copyright
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interests: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form at http://www.icmje.org/coi_disclosure.pdf (available on request from the corresponding author) and declare: no support from any organisation for the submitted work other than that described above; no financial relationships with any organisations that might have an interest in the submitted work in the previous three years; AGR is national clinical director for stroke in England and clinical director for stroke in London; PJT was clinical lead for stroke in Greater Manchester up to 2013 and led the Greater Manchester stroke service redesign from 2007 until 2012.
Références
Health Econ. 2018 Apr;27(4):722-732
pubmed: 29282793
Stroke. 2015 Aug;46(8):2244-51
pubmed: 26130092
Stroke. 2015 Feb;46(2):579-81
pubmed: 25550369
Resuscitation. 2014 Jan;85(1):96-8
pubmed: 24056392
Lancet Neurol. 2016 Aug;15(9):913-924
pubmed: 27291521
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2016 Jan;21(1):51-60
pubmed: 25990712
Presse Med. 2016 Dec;45(12 Pt 2):e399-e408
pubmed: 27836375
Ann Surg Oncol. 2009 Jul;16(7):1789-98
pubmed: 19370377
Neurology. 2018 Jul 17;91(3):e236-e248
pubmed: 29907609
Eur Stroke J. 2019 Mar;4(1):13-28
pubmed: 31165091
Resuscitation. 2016 Sep;106:42-8
pubmed: 27368428
Can J Neurol Sci. 2017 Sep;44(5):475-482
pubmed: 28485255
BMJ. 2014 Aug 05;349:g4757
pubmed: 25098169
JAMA Neurol. 2013 Sep 1;70(9):1126-32
pubmed: 23817961
Health Res Policy Syst. 2018 Mar 14;16(1):23
pubmed: 29540216
Health Policy. 2015 Aug;119(8):1005-10
pubmed: 26094752
Implement Sci. 2013 Jan 05;8:5
pubmed: 23289439
BMJ. 2013 May 10;346:f2827
pubmed: 23667071
Stroke. 2013 Oct;44(10):2961-84
pubmed: 23988638
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2005 Jun;76(6):863-5
pubmed: 15897513
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2004 Oct;9(4):197-204
pubmed: 15509405
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2017 Nov;99(8):617-623
pubmed: 28682128
J Neurol. 2013 Apr;260(4):960-8
pubmed: 22915092
PLoS One. 2013 Aug 01;8(8):e70420
pubmed: 23936427
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2015 Jan;78(1):164-77
pubmed: 25539218
Stroke. 2012 May;43(5):1336-40
pubmed: 22426467
J Gastrointest Surg. 2017 Dec;21(12):2000-2008
pubmed: 28815471
Stroke. 2013 Oct;44(10):2848-53
pubmed: 23950561
Stroke. 2016 Dec;47(12):2999-3004
pubmed: 27834751
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Sep 11;(9):CD000197
pubmed: 24026639
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2010 Dec;81(12):1301-5
pubmed: 20601665
Stroke. 2013 Nov;44(11):3044-9
pubmed: 24065713
N Engl J Med. 2012 Nov 8;367(19):1821-8
pubmed: 23134382
BMJ Qual Saf. 2018 Aug;27(8):611-618
pubmed: 29079641