Belatacept in kidney transplantation and its limitations.
Abatacept
/ therapeutic use
Animals
B7-1 Antigen
/ antagonists & inhibitors
CD28 Antigens
/ antagonists & inhibitors
Clinical Trials as Topic
Graft Rejection
/ prevention & control
Humans
Immunosuppressive Agents
/ therapeutic use
Kidney
/ drug effects
Kidney Transplantation
Signal Transduction
/ drug effects
Treatment Outcome
CD80/CD86
Kidney transplantation
acute rejection
belatacept
renal function
Journal
Expert review of clinical immunology
ISSN: 1744-8409
Titre abrégé: Expert Rev Clin Immunol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101271248
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
04 2019
04 2019
Historique:
pubmed:
25
1
2019
medline:
26
5
2020
entrez:
25
1
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Since the approval of belatacept in 2011 for use in the setting of de novo kidney transplantation, this CD80/86 - CD28 co-stimulation blocker has been shown to be a valuable treatment option for maintenance immunosuppression. Areas covered: In this setting, belatacept has been associated with superior glomerular filtration rate as compared to calcineurin inhibitor-based treatments because of the absence of nephrotoxicity. Additionally, belatacept avoids the cardiovascular side effects (e.g. hypertension and dyslipidemia) caused by a CNI-based-regimen. Nevertheless, belatacept-treated recipients have a higher rate of acute rejections and a higher risk of lymphoproliferative disorders. Expert opinion: Data suggest a benefit from early conversion vs. late conversion of belatacept in a conversion setting following CNI-related toxicity. Randomized studies are currently comparing belatacept to tacrolimus, instead of cyclosporine, as was done in the Belatacept Evaluation of Nephroprotection and Efficacy as a First-line Immunosuppression Trial (BENEFIT). The benefits and limitations of belatacept seem to be the same when tacrolimus is used instead of cyclosporine. Finally, we also report in this review on the immunological data available so far that explain belatacept's limitations and the higher rate of acute rejection. The goal is to find the optimal immunosuppressive strategy to improve efficacy and safety at post-transplantation.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30676815
doi: 10.1080/1744666X.2019.1574570
doi:
Substances chimiques
B7-1 Antigen
0
CD28 Antigens
0
Immunosuppressive Agents
0
Abatacept
7D0YB67S97
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM