Immunonutrition for acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) in adults.


Journal

The Cochrane database of systematic reviews
ISSN: 1469-493X
Titre abrégé: Cochrane Database Syst Rev
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100909747

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
24 01 2019
Historique:
pubmed: 25 1 2019
medline: 11 4 2019
entrez: 25 1 2019
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is an overwhelming systemic inflammatory process associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Pharmacotherapies that moderate inflammation in ARDS are lacking. Several trials have evaluated the effects of pharmaconutrients, given as part of a feeding formula or as a nutritional supplement, on clinical outcomes in critical illness and ARDS. To systematically review and critically appraise available evidence on the effects of immunonutrition compared to standard non-immunonutrition formula feeding on mechanically ventilated adults (aged 18 years or older) with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). We searched MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, conference proceedings, and trial registries for appropriate studies up to 25 April 2018. We checked the references from published studies and reviews on this topic for potentially eligible studies. We included all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-randomized controlled trials comparing immunonutrition versus a control or placebo nutritional formula in adults (aged 18 years or older) with ARDS, as defined by the Berlin definition of ARDS or, for older studies, by the American-European Consensus Criteria for both ARDS and acute lung injury. Two review authors independently assessed the quality of studies and extracted data from the included trials. We sought additional information from study authors. We performed statistical analysis according to Cochrane methodological standards. Our primary outcome was all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes included intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay, ventilator days, indices of oxygenation, cardiac adverse events, gastrointestinal adverse events, and total number of adverse events. We used GRADE to assess the quality of evidence for each outcome. We identified 10 randomized controlled trials with 1015 participants. All studies compared an enteral formula or additional supplemental omega-3 fatty acids (i.e. eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA), docosahexaenoic acid (DHA)), gamma-linolenic acid (GLA), and antioxidants. We assessed some of the included studies as having high risk of bias due to methodological shortcomings. Studies were heterogenous in nature and varied in several ways, including type and duration of interventions given, calorific targets, and reported outcomes. All studies reported mortality. For the primary outcome, study authors reported no differences in all-cause mortality (longest period reported) with the use of an immunonutrition enteral formula or additional supplements of omega-3 fatty acids and antioxidants (risk ratio (RR) 0.79, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.59 to 1.07; participants = 1015; studies = 10; low-quality evidence).For secondary outcomes, we are uncertain whether immunonutrition with omega-3 fatty acids and antioxidants reduces ICU length of stay (mean difference (MD) -3.09 days. 95% CI -5.19 to -0.99; participants = 639; studies = 8; very low-quality evidence) and ventilator days (MD -2.24 days, 95% CI -3.77 to -0.71; participants = 581; studies = 7; very low-quality evidence). We are also uncertain whether omega-3 fatty acids and antioxidants improve oxygenation, defined as ratio of partial pressure of arterial oxygen (PaO₂) to fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO₂), at day 4 (MD 39 mmHg, 95% CI 10.75 to 67.02; participants = 676; studies = 8), or whether they increase adverse events such as cardiac events (RR 0.87, 95% CI 0.09 to 8.46; participants = 339; studies = 3; very low-quality evidence), gastrointestinal events (RR 1.11, 95% CI 0.71 to 1.75; participants = 427; studies = 4; very low-quality evidence), or total adverse events (RR 0.91, 95% CI 0.67 to 1.23; participants = 517; studies = 5; very low-quality evidence). This meta-analysis of 10 studies of varying quality examined effects of omega-3 fatty acids and/or antioxidants in adults with ARDS. This intervention may produce little or no difference in all-cause mortality between groups. We are uncertain whether immunonutrition with omega-3 fatty acids and antioxidants improves the duration of ventilator days and ICU length of stay or oxygenation at day 4 due to the very low quality of evidence. Adverse events associated with immunonutrition are also uncertain, as confidence intervals include the potential for increased cardiac, gastrointestinal, and total adverse events.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is an overwhelming systemic inflammatory process associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Pharmacotherapies that moderate inflammation in ARDS are lacking. Several trials have evaluated the effects of pharmaconutrients, given as part of a feeding formula or as a nutritional supplement, on clinical outcomes in critical illness and ARDS.
OBJECTIVES
To systematically review and critically appraise available evidence on the effects of immunonutrition compared to standard non-immunonutrition formula feeding on mechanically ventilated adults (aged 18 years or older) with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS).
SEARCH METHODS
We searched MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, conference proceedings, and trial registries for appropriate studies up to 25 April 2018. We checked the references from published studies and reviews on this topic for potentially eligible studies.
SELECTION CRITERIA
We included all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-randomized controlled trials comparing immunonutrition versus a control or placebo nutritional formula in adults (aged 18 years or older) with ARDS, as defined by the Berlin definition of ARDS or, for older studies, by the American-European Consensus Criteria for both ARDS and acute lung injury.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Two review authors independently assessed the quality of studies and extracted data from the included trials. We sought additional information from study authors. We performed statistical analysis according to Cochrane methodological standards. Our primary outcome was all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes included intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay, ventilator days, indices of oxygenation, cardiac adverse events, gastrointestinal adverse events, and total number of adverse events. We used GRADE to assess the quality of evidence for each outcome.
MAIN RESULTS
We identified 10 randomized controlled trials with 1015 participants. All studies compared an enteral formula or additional supplemental omega-3 fatty acids (i.e. eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA), docosahexaenoic acid (DHA)), gamma-linolenic acid (GLA), and antioxidants. We assessed some of the included studies as having high risk of bias due to methodological shortcomings. Studies were heterogenous in nature and varied in several ways, including type and duration of interventions given, calorific targets, and reported outcomes. All studies reported mortality. For the primary outcome, study authors reported no differences in all-cause mortality (longest period reported) with the use of an immunonutrition enteral formula or additional supplements of omega-3 fatty acids and antioxidants (risk ratio (RR) 0.79, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.59 to 1.07; participants = 1015; studies = 10; low-quality evidence).For secondary outcomes, we are uncertain whether immunonutrition with omega-3 fatty acids and antioxidants reduces ICU length of stay (mean difference (MD) -3.09 days. 95% CI -5.19 to -0.99; participants = 639; studies = 8; very low-quality evidence) and ventilator days (MD -2.24 days, 95% CI -3.77 to -0.71; participants = 581; studies = 7; very low-quality evidence). We are also uncertain whether omega-3 fatty acids and antioxidants improve oxygenation, defined as ratio of partial pressure of arterial oxygen (PaO₂) to fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO₂), at day 4 (MD 39 mmHg, 95% CI 10.75 to 67.02; participants = 676; studies = 8), or whether they increase adverse events such as cardiac events (RR 0.87, 95% CI 0.09 to 8.46; participants = 339; studies = 3; very low-quality evidence), gastrointestinal events (RR 1.11, 95% CI 0.71 to 1.75; participants = 427; studies = 4; very low-quality evidence), or total adverse events (RR 0.91, 95% CI 0.67 to 1.23; participants = 517; studies = 5; very low-quality evidence).
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
This meta-analysis of 10 studies of varying quality examined effects of omega-3 fatty acids and/or antioxidants in adults with ARDS. This intervention may produce little or no difference in all-cause mortality between groups. We are uncertain whether immunonutrition with omega-3 fatty acids and antioxidants improves the duration of ventilator days and ICU length of stay or oxygenation at day 4 due to the very low quality of evidence. Adverse events associated with immunonutrition are also uncertain, as confidence intervals include the potential for increased cardiac, gastrointestinal, and total adverse events.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30677127
doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012041.pub2
pmc: PMC6353063
doi:

Substances chimiques

Antioxidants 0
Fatty Acids, Omega-3 0
Docosahexaenoic Acids 25167-62-8
gamma-Linolenic Acid 78YC2MAX4O
Eicosapentaenoic Acid AAN7QOV9EA

Types de publication

Journal Article Meta-Analysis Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Systematic Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

CD012041

Références

Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2011 Feb 15;183(4):462-70
pubmed: 20802164
Crit Care Med. 1999 Aug;27(8):1409-20
pubmed: 10470743
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Jan 24;1:CD012041
pubmed: 30677127
BMJ. 2003 Jul 19;327(7407):117-8
pubmed: 12869428
Crit Care Med. 2006 Apr;34(4):1033-8
pubmed: 16484911
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2005 Apr 20;5:13
pubmed: 15840177
Q J Exp Physiol. 1985 Oct;70(4):473-89
pubmed: 3909197
Nutrients. 2015 Jul 09;7(7):5572-85
pubmed: 26184293
Indian J Crit Care Med. 2011 Apr;15(2):108-13
pubmed: 21814375
Br J Nutr. 2007 Oct;98 Suppl 1:S133-9
pubmed: 17922951
Crit Care Med. 2002 Sep;30(9):2022-9
pubmed: 12352035
Lancet. 1967 Aug 12;2(7511):319-23
pubmed: 4143721
Adv Pharm Bull. 2014 Dec;4(Suppl 2):555-61
pubmed: 25671189
N Engl J Med. 2013 Apr 18;368(16):1489-97
pubmed: 23594003
Am J Physiol. 1995 Dec;269(6 Pt 2):H2090-9
pubmed: 8594921
Intensive Care Med. 2014 Apr;40(4):504-12
pubmed: 24556914
JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2016 Feb;40(2):159-211
pubmed: 26773077
Annu Rev Pathol. 2011;6:147-63
pubmed: 20936936
Crit Care Med. 1999 Dec;27(12):2799-805
pubmed: 10628629
Stat Med. 2006 Oct 30;25(20):3443-57
pubmed: 16345038
Crit Care Med. 2006 Sep;34(9):2325-33
pubmed: 16850002
Clin Nutr. 2011 Oct;30(5):578-84
pubmed: 21474219
JAMA. 2001 Aug 22-29;286(8):944-53
pubmed: 11509059
JAMA. 2011 Oct 12;306(14):1574-81
pubmed: 21976613
J Surg Res. 2000 Sep;93(1):21-7
pubmed: 10945939
Clin Nutr. 2007 Dec;26(6):752-7
pubmed: 17933438
Postgrad Med J. 2011 Sep;87(1031):612-22
pubmed: 21642654
BMJ. 1997 Sep 13;315(7109):629-34
pubmed: 9310563
Intensive Care Med. 2005 Mar;31(3):327-37
pubmed: 15605227
N Engl J Med. 2011 Apr 7;364(14):1293-304
pubmed: 21470008
Chest. 2002 Dec;122(6 Suppl):314S-320S
pubmed: 12475808
Nutrition. 2010 Jul-Aug;26(7-8):701-7
pubmed: 20381315
Eur Respir J. 2004 Dec;24(6):994-9
pubmed: 15572544
JAMA. 2012 Jun 20;307(23):2526-33
pubmed: 22797452
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1994 Mar;149(3 Pt 1):818-24
pubmed: 7509706
Clin Epidemiol. 2012;4:159-69
pubmed: 22866017
J Nutr Disord Ther. 2012 Mar 26;2:109
pubmed: 24761313
JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2008 Nov-Dec;32(6):596-605
pubmed: 18974237
Crit Care Med. 1997 Jul;25(7):1198-206
pubmed: 9233748
JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2003 Mar-Apr;27(2):98-104
pubmed: 12665164
Intensive Care Med. 1999 Feb;25(2):180-5
pubmed: 10193545
Crit Care Med. 2011 Jul;39(7):1655-62
pubmed: 21423000
Crit Care Med. 2003 Feb;31(2):491-500
pubmed: 12576957
J Intensive Care. 2015 May 19;3(1):24
pubmed: 26015869
BMJ. 2011 Mar 17;342:d1542
pubmed: 21415104
Crit Care Med. 1997 Mar;25(3):523-32
pubmed: 9118672
BMJ. 2008 May 3;336(7651):995-8
pubmed: 18456631
J Nutr. 2007 Jun;137(6 Suppl 2):1681S-1686S
pubmed: 17513447
Br J Nutr. 2014 Nov 28;112(10):1601-10
pubmed: 25322775
Intensive Care Med. 2014 Mar;40(3):388-96
pubmed: 24435201
Crit Care. 2015 Aug 18;19:294
pubmed: 26283217

Auteurs

Ahilanandan Dushianthan (A)

General Intensive Care Unit, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Tremona Road, Southampton, Hampshire, UK, SO16 6YD.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH