Intravital imaging reveals systemic ezrin inhibition impedes cancer cell migration and lymph node metastasis in breast cancer.
Animals
Antineoplastic Agents
/ pharmacology
Biomarkers, Tumor
/ antagonists & inhibitors
Breast
/ pathology
Breast Neoplasms
/ diagnostic imaging
Cell Line, Tumor
/ transplantation
Cell Movement
/ drug effects
Cohort Studies
Cytoskeletal Proteins
/ antagonists & inhibitors
Disease Models, Animal
Female
Genes, Reporter
Humans
Intravital Microscopy
Lung
/ diagnostic imaging
Lung Neoplasms
/ diagnostic imaging
Lymph Nodes
/ diagnostic imaging
Lymphatic Metastasis
/ diagnostic imaging
Mice
Mice, Inbred C57BL
Mice, Transgenic
Middle Aged
Neoplasm Recurrence, Local
/ pathology
Phenols
/ pharmacology
Quinolones
/ pharmacology
Tissue Array Analysis
Biomarker
Cell migration
Ezrin
Lymph node metastasis
Metastatic disease
Quantitative intravital imaging
Journal
Breast cancer research : BCR
ISSN: 1465-542X
Titre abrégé: Breast Cancer Res
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100927353
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
24 01 2019
24 01 2019
Historique:
received:
24
08
2017
accepted:
12
11
2018
entrez:
26
1
2019
pubmed:
27
1
2019
medline:
23
7
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Limited understanding of the cancer biology of metastatic sites is a major factor contributing to poor outcomes in cancer patients. The regional lymph nodes are the most common site of metastasis in most solid cancers and their involvement is a strong predictor of relapse in breast cancer (BC). We have previously shown that ezrin, a cytoskeletal-membrane linker protein, is associated with lymphovascular invasion and promotes metastatic progression in BC. However, the efficacy of pharmacological inhibition of ezrin in blocking cancer cell migration and metastasis remains unexplored in BC. We quantified ezrin expression in a BC tissue microarray (n = 347) to assess its correlation with risk of relapse. Next, we developed a quantitative intravital microscopy (qIVM) approach, using a syngeneic lymphatic reporter mouse tumor model, to investigate the effect of systemic ezrin inhibition on cancer cell migration and metastasis. We show that ezrin is expressed at significantly higher levels in lymph node metastases compared to matched primary tumors, and that a high tumor ezrin level is associated with increased risk of relapse in BC patients with regional disease. Using qIVM, we observe a subset of cancer cells that retain their invasive and migratory phenotype at the tumor-draining lymph node. We further show that systemic inhibition of ezrin, using a small molecule compound (NSC668394), impedes the migration of cancer cells in vivo. Furthermore, systemic ezrin inhibition leads to reductions in metastatic burden at the distal axillary lymph node and lungs. Our findings demonstrate that the tumor ezrin level act as an independent biomarker in predicting relapse and provide a rationale for therapeutic targeting of ezrin to reduce the metastatic capacity of cancer cells in high-risk BC patients with elevated ezrin expression.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Limited understanding of the cancer biology of metastatic sites is a major factor contributing to poor outcomes in cancer patients. The regional lymph nodes are the most common site of metastasis in most solid cancers and their involvement is a strong predictor of relapse in breast cancer (BC). We have previously shown that ezrin, a cytoskeletal-membrane linker protein, is associated with lymphovascular invasion and promotes metastatic progression in BC. However, the efficacy of pharmacological inhibition of ezrin in blocking cancer cell migration and metastasis remains unexplored in BC.
METHODS
We quantified ezrin expression in a BC tissue microarray (n = 347) to assess its correlation with risk of relapse. Next, we developed a quantitative intravital microscopy (qIVM) approach, using a syngeneic lymphatic reporter mouse tumor model, to investigate the effect of systemic ezrin inhibition on cancer cell migration and metastasis.
RESULTS
We show that ezrin is expressed at significantly higher levels in lymph node metastases compared to matched primary tumors, and that a high tumor ezrin level is associated with increased risk of relapse in BC patients with regional disease. Using qIVM, we observe a subset of cancer cells that retain their invasive and migratory phenotype at the tumor-draining lymph node. We further show that systemic inhibition of ezrin, using a small molecule compound (NSC668394), impedes the migration of cancer cells in vivo. Furthermore, systemic ezrin inhibition leads to reductions in metastatic burden at the distal axillary lymph node and lungs.
CONCLUSIONS
Our findings demonstrate that the tumor ezrin level act as an independent biomarker in predicting relapse and provide a rationale for therapeutic targeting of ezrin to reduce the metastatic capacity of cancer cells in high-risk BC patients with elevated ezrin expression.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30678714
doi: 10.1186/s13058-018-1079-7
pii: 10.1186/s13058-018-1079-7
pmc: PMC6345049
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antineoplastic Agents
0
Biomarkers, Tumor
0
Cytoskeletal Proteins
0
NSC668394
0
Phenols
0
Quinolones
0
ezrin
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
12Subventions
Organisme : CIHR
ID : 114518
Pays : Canada
Références
Anticancer Res. 2005 Nov-Dec;25(6B):3905-15
pubmed: 16312045
Cancer Cell. 2008 Jan;13(1):58-68
pubmed: 18167340
BMC Cancer. 2014 Mar 15;14:191
pubmed: 24629131
Lancet. 2009 Apr 25;373(9673):1463-79
pubmed: 19394537
Science. 2018 Mar 23;359(6382):1403-1407
pubmed: 29567713
Bioorg Med Chem. 2014 Jan 1;22(1):478-87
pubmed: 24326277
Mol Biol Cell. 2005 Mar;16(3):1481-90
pubmed: 15647376
N Engl J Med. 2011 Feb 3;364(5):412-21
pubmed: 21247310
J Cell Biochem. 2004 May 1;92(1):16-28
pubmed: 15095400
Cancers (Basel). 2012 Jul 18;4(3):725-42
pubmed: 24213463
Sci Transl Med. 2017 Jul 5;9(397):
pubmed: 28679654
N Engl J Med. 2015 Nov 5;373(19):1878-9
pubmed: 26535517
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2015 Feb 20;107(4):
pubmed: 25710962
BMC Cancer. 2012 Mar 07;12:82
pubmed: 22397367
Annu Rev Biomed Eng. 2016 Jul 11;18:125-58
pubmed: 26863922
Oncogene. 2009 Feb 12;28(6):792-802
pubmed: 19060919
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2006 Nov;100(2):229-35
pubmed: 16932852
Nature. 2016 Jan 21;529(7586):298-306
pubmed: 26791720
Mol Cell Biol. 2015 Sep;35(18):3145-62
pubmed: 26149384
Nat Protoc. 2014 Aug;9(8):1931-43
pubmed: 25033209
J Biol Chem. 2015 Feb 27;290(9):5783-96
pubmed: 25575591
World J Clin Oncol. 2015 Feb 10;6(1):1-6
pubmed: 25667909
Mol Biol Cell. 2007 Aug;18(8):2935-48
pubmed: 17538024
Nat Med. 2004 Feb;10(2):175-81
pubmed: 14704789
Cell. 2016 Apr 21;165(3):668-78
pubmed: 27062926
Oncol Rep. 2015 Jul;34(1):165-74
pubmed: 25955302
N Engl J Med. 1997 Oct 2;337(14):956-62
pubmed: 9309100
Sci Rep. 2015 Dec 03;5:17903
pubmed: 26632332
Nat Rev Cancer. 2007 Oct;7(10):737-49
pubmed: 17891189
Exp Mol Pathol. 2015 Feb;98(1):1-6
pubmed: 25445504
Oncogene. 2012 Jan 19;31(3):269-81
pubmed: 21706056
Mol Biol Cell. 2015 Oct 1;26(19):3464-79
pubmed: 26246600
Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2010 Apr;11(4):276-87
pubmed: 20308985
Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2017 Jan;14(1):32-44
pubmed: 27550857
Pathophysiology. 2010 Sep;17(4):229-51
pubmed: 20036110
Biochem Soc Trans. 2011 Dec;39(6):1674-81
pubmed: 22103506
Nat Cell Biol. 2009 Nov;11(11):1287-96
pubmed: 19838175
Science. 2018 Mar 23;359(6382):1408-1411
pubmed: 29567714
Cancer. 1952 Mar;5(2):382-402
pubmed: 14905426
J Cell Sci. 2014 Jan 15;127(Pt 2):267-75
pubmed: 24421310
EMBO J. 2008 Jan 9;27(1):38-50
pubmed: 18046454
J Exp Med. 2013 Jul 29;210(8):1509-28
pubmed: 23878309
Breast Cancer Res. 2014 Sep 18;16(5):438
pubmed: 25231728