Effects of control measures on the spread of LA-MRSA among Danish pig herds between 2006 and 2015 - a simulation study.
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
24 01 2019
24 01 2019
Historique:
received:
06
10
2018
accepted:
30
11
2018
entrez:
26
1
2019
pubmed:
27
1
2019
medline:
11
8
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
There has been a rapid increase in Danish pig herds testing positive for livestock-associated Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (LA-MRSA) since the first screening in 2008. Despite a national action plan to control LA-MRSA in the Danish pig population, 88% of pig herds tested positive in a 2016 cross-sectional study of 57 herds. The national action plan was initiated in April 2015 and aimed to reduce the spread of LA-MRSA among pig herds. However, its success is uncertain. We used a simulation model mimicking the spread of LA-MRSA among pig herds between 2006 and 2015 to evaluate the impact of control strategies if these had these been implemented in 2007 or 2010. The strategies were combinations of the following control measures: (1) a reduced number of herds using high-risk antibiotics, (2) a reduced probability of indirect transmission among herds via humans, (3) movement restrictions, and (4) voluntary eradication in 5-7.5% of the herds. Almost all tested control strategies simulated a reduction in the spread of LA-MRSA. The combination of two, three or four intervention strategies showed additive effects and led to larger reductions in the predicted herd prevalence. In addition, the prevalence of LA-MRSA-positive herds at the time when control measures were initiated influenced the effects of the control strategies. Combining the simulated control measures can be considered in future action plans to control LA-MRSA.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30679650
doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-37075-8
pii: 10.1038/s41598-018-37075-8
pmc: PMC6346033
doi:
Substances chimiques
Anti-Bacterial Agents
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
691Références
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2001 May;45(5):1323-36
pubmed: 11302791
Emerg Infect Dis. 2005 Dec;11(12):1965-6
pubmed: 16485492
Vet Microbiol. 2007 Jun 21;122(3-4):384-6
pubmed: 17467199
Vet Microbiol. 2008 Jan 25;126(4):383-9
pubmed: 17765409
Prev Vet Med. 2009 Aug 1;90(3-4):180-93
pubmed: 19439381
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2009 Dec;64(6):1156-64
pubmed: 19808235
Epidemiol Infect. 2010 May;138(5):626-44
pubmed: 20141646
Prev Vet Med. 2011 Feb 1;98(2-3):182-9
pubmed: 21075466
Trends Microbiol. 2012 Apr;20(4):192-8
pubmed: 22386364
Vet Rec. 2012 Jun 2;170(22):564
pubmed: 22562100
BMC Vet Res. 2012 May 18;8:58
pubmed: 22607475
Epidemiol Infect. 2014 Aug;142(8):1727-36
pubmed: 24229727
Clin Infect Dis. 2016 Dec 1;63(11):1431-1438
pubmed: 27516381
PLoS One. 2017 Jun 29;12(6):e0179915
pubmed: 28662077
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2017 Nov 16;83(23):null
pubmed: 28970219
PLoS One. 2018 Jul 12;13(7):e0200563
pubmed: 30001405
Sci Rep. 2018 Nov 16;8(1):16962
pubmed: 30446719