Evaluation of Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra performance for pulmonary tuberculosis diagnosis on smear-negative respiratory samples in a French centre.
Antibiotics, Antitubercular
/ pharmacology
Diagnostic Tests, Routine
Drug Resistance, Bacterial
/ drug effects
Humans
Molecular Diagnostic Techniques
/ methods
Mycobacterium tuberculosis
/ drug effects
Retrospective Studies
Rifampin
/ pharmacology
Sensitivity and Specificity
Sputum
/ microbiology
Tuberculosis, Multidrug-Resistant
/ diagnosis
Tuberculosis, Pulmonary
/ diagnosis
Diagnosis
High-resource setting
Pulmonary tuberculosis
Smear-negative
Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra
Journal
European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology
ISSN: 1435-4373
Titre abrégé: Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 8804297
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Mar 2019
Mar 2019
Historique:
received:
21
11
2018
accepted:
26
12
2018
pubmed:
27
1
2019
medline:
13
9
2019
entrez:
26
1
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Tuberculosis (TB) is a worldwide public health concern, including in high-resource countries with a low prevalence of TB. Xpert MTB/RIF assay was developed to improve TB and rifampicin (RIF) resistance detection, but sensitivity remains poor on smear-negative sputum. Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra assay was designed to enhance the sensitivity of TB detection in clinical samples. Herein, we evaluated retrospectively the performance of this test on smear-negative respiratory samples. Respiratory specimens with smear-negative and a Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) complex-positive culture were retrospectively selected from those taken from patients during routine care, and analysed in the Mycobacteria Laboratory of the Lyon University hospital, France. Specimens were stored at - 20 °C before testing by Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra. For each sample, growth delay and date of anti-TB treatment initiation were recorded. Forty-six samples-29 sputum, 8 bronchial aspirates, 6 broncho-alveolar lavages, and 3 gastric aspirates-were selected. Among samples collected before treatment initiation (n = 33), sensitivity was 81.8% (95% CI [64.5; 93.0]) and there was a significant correlation between the quantitative measurements (Ct) of Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra assay and the time to growth detection in culture. Among samples collected after treatment initiation (n = 12), sensitivity was 100%, without correlation with time to growth detection due to presence of afterglow DNA in samples. In high-resource settings, the Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra test represents a useful tool for pulmonary TB diagnosis, notably for the paucibacillary forms. Moreover, quantitative measurement of Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra could help to predict time to MTB culture positivity and be used as a quality indicator of MTB culture process.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30680567
doi: 10.1007/s10096-018-03463-1
pii: 10.1007/s10096-018-03463-1
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antibiotics, Antitubercular
0
Rifampin
VJT6J7R4TR
Types de publication
Evaluation Study
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
601-605Références
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2000 Jul;6(7):363-7
pubmed: 11168152
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2009 Jan 16;58(1):7-10
pubmed: 19145221
Clin Infect Dis. 2014 Apr;58(7):970-6
pubmed: 24429440
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Jan 21;(1):CD009593
pubmed: 24448973
J Infect. 2017 Aug;75(2):125-131
pubmed: 28501491
MBio. 2017 Aug 29;8(4):
pubmed: 28851844
Lancet Infect Dis. 2018 Jan;18(1):68-75
pubmed: 28919338
Lancet Infect Dis. 2018 Jan;18(1):8-10
pubmed: 29198910
Lancet Infect Dis. 2018 Jan;18(1):76-84
pubmed: 29198911
PLoS Med. 2017 Dec 14;14(12):e1002472
pubmed: 29240766
Clin Microbiol Rev. 2018 Jan 31;31(2):
pubmed: 29386234
Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2018 Oct;37(10):e261-e263
pubmed: 29474257
J Clin Microbiol. 2018 Aug 27;56(9):
pubmed: 29950333
PLoS One. 2018 Aug 13;13(8):e0201934
pubmed: 30102737
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2018 Sep 25;:null
pubmed: 30252496
J Clin Microbiol. 2018 Nov 27;56(12):
pubmed: 30305387
J Clin Microbiol. 1987 Aug;25(8):1428-32
pubmed: 3305557
J Clin Microbiol. 1995 Oct;33(10):2763-4
pubmed: 8567921