Pace and determinants of implementation of the self-management of well-being group intervention: a multilevel observational study.
Determinants
Health care
Implementation
Multilevel-analysis
Older adults
Pace
Self-management
Social care
Well-being
Journal
BMC health services research
ISSN: 1472-6963
Titre abrégé: BMC Health Serv Res
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101088677
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
25 Jan 2019
25 Jan 2019
Historique:
received:
08
02
2018
accepted:
09
01
2019
entrez:
27
1
2019
pubmed:
27
1
2019
medline:
19
3
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
When implementing an empirically supported intervention (ESI) arrays of influencing factors operate on the professional and organizational level, but so far dependency between these levels has often been ignored. The aim of this study is to describe the pace and identify determinants of implementation of the Self-Management of Well-being (SMW) group intervention while taking the dependency between professionals and organizations into account. Pace of implementation was measured as the time between training of professionals and first use of the SMW intervention in months. Determinants of first use were derived from the Fleuren framework and assessed using web-based questionnaires and telephone interviews. First, univariate analyses, Fisher's exact tests and t-tests, were performed to identify determinants of first use of the SMW intervention on the individual professional and the organizational level independently. Second, multilevel analyses were performed to correct for the dependency between professionals and organizations. Simple multilevel logistic regression analyses were performed with determinants found significant in the univariate analyses as independent variables, first use as dependent variable, professionals entered in the first level, and organizations in the second level. Forty-eight professionals from 18 organizations were trained to execute the SMW intervention. Thirty-two professionals achieved first use, at a mean pace of 7.5 months ± 4.2. Determinants on the professional level were 'ownership', 'relative advantage', 'support from colleagues' and 'compatibility'. Determinants on the organizational level were 'organizational size' and 'innovation-task orientation fit'. Multilevel analysis showed that 'compatibility', a factor on the professional level, was the only significant determinant contributing to first use in the multilevel model. This implementation study revealed a strong dependency between professionals and organizations. Results showed that a majority of professionals used the SMW intervention in about 8 months. When the dependency between professionals and organization was taken into account, the professionals' perception of compatibility was the only remaining determinant of implementation on the professional level. Organizational size and managers' perception of 'innovation-task orientation fit' were determinants of implementation on the organizational level. It is advisable to discuss the compatibility between new and current tasks among managers and professionals before adopting a new intervention.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
When implementing an empirically supported intervention (ESI) arrays of influencing factors operate on the professional and organizational level, but so far dependency between these levels has often been ignored. The aim of this study is to describe the pace and identify determinants of implementation of the Self-Management of Well-being (SMW) group intervention while taking the dependency between professionals and organizations into account.
METHODS
METHODS
Pace of implementation was measured as the time between training of professionals and first use of the SMW intervention in months. Determinants of first use were derived from the Fleuren framework and assessed using web-based questionnaires and telephone interviews. First, univariate analyses, Fisher's exact tests and t-tests, were performed to identify determinants of first use of the SMW intervention on the individual professional and the organizational level independently. Second, multilevel analyses were performed to correct for the dependency between professionals and organizations. Simple multilevel logistic regression analyses were performed with determinants found significant in the univariate analyses as independent variables, first use as dependent variable, professionals entered in the first level, and organizations in the second level.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Forty-eight professionals from 18 organizations were trained to execute the SMW intervention. Thirty-two professionals achieved first use, at a mean pace of 7.5 months ± 4.2. Determinants on the professional level were 'ownership', 'relative advantage', 'support from colleagues' and 'compatibility'. Determinants on the organizational level were 'organizational size' and 'innovation-task orientation fit'. Multilevel analysis showed that 'compatibility', a factor on the professional level, was the only significant determinant contributing to first use in the multilevel model.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
This implementation study revealed a strong dependency between professionals and organizations. Results showed that a majority of professionals used the SMW intervention in about 8 months. When the dependency between professionals and organization was taken into account, the professionals' perception of compatibility was the only remaining determinant of implementation on the professional level. Organizational size and managers' perception of 'innovation-task orientation fit' were determinants of implementation on the organizational level. It is advisable to discuss the compatibility between new and current tasks among managers and professionals before adopting a new intervention.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30683092
doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-3891-x
pii: 10.1186/s12913-019-3891-x
pmc: PMC6346574
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Observational Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
67Subventions
Organisme : Dutch Organization for Health Research and Development
ID : 313010401
Références
Br J Psychiatry. 1999 Apr;174:307-11
pubmed: 10533549
J Ambul Care Manage. 1999 Jul;22(3):17-23
pubmed: 11184876
Med J Aust. 2004 Mar 15;180(6 Suppl):S57-60
pubmed: 15012583
Int J Qual Health Care. 2004 Apr;16(2):107-23
pubmed: 15051705
Milbank Q. 2004;82(4):581-629
pubmed: 15595944
Patient Educ Couns. 2006 May;61(2):219-27
pubmed: 15939567
Aging Ment Health. 2006 Sep;10(5):476-84
pubmed: 16938683
J Prim Prev. 2006 Nov;27(6):599-617
pubmed: 17051431
Nurs Res. 2007 Jul-Aug;56(4 Suppl):S7-23
pubmed: 17625477
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2010 Mar;15(1):109-128
pubmed: 18274876
Am J Community Psychol. 2008 Jun;41(3-4):171-81
pubmed: 18302018
Am J Community Psychol. 2008 Jun;41(3-4):327-50
pubmed: 18322790
Prev Chronic Dis. 2008 Apr;5(2):A38
pubmed: 18341774
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2009 Jan;36(1):24-34
pubmed: 19104929
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2009 Mar;36(2):133-43
pubmed: 19214734
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2010 Jul-Sep;14(3):355-60
pubmed: 20388032
Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2011 Aug;15(3):219-66
pubmed: 20716644
Patient Educ Couns. 2010 Dec;81(3):324-31
pubmed: 20934834
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2012 Nov;39(6):478-88
pubmed: 21874598
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2012 Jul 12;12:69
pubmed: 22788730
Am J Prev Med. 2012 Sep;43(3):337-50
pubmed: 22898128
Implement Sci. 2012 Dec 31;7:122
pubmed: 23276201
J R Soc Med. 2012 Dec;105(12):518-22
pubmed: 23288086
Int J Qual Health Care. 2014 Oct;26(5):501-10
pubmed: 24951511
BMC Health Serv Res. 2015 Jan 22;15:6
pubmed: 25608564
Contact Dermatitis. 2015 May;72(5):325-36
pubmed: 25739424
BMC Health Serv Res. 2015 Feb 14;15:62
pubmed: 25890333
Implement Sci. 2015 Apr 21;10:53
pubmed: 25895742
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2015 Jun 1;16(6):537.e1-10
pubmed: 25899110
BMC Res Notes. 2015 Jul 07;8:296
pubmed: 26148775
BMC Public Health. 2015 Oct 08;15:1032
pubmed: 26449368
Patient Educ Couns. 2017 Jun;100(6):1177-1184
pubmed: 28089311
Eur J Ageing. 2005 Dec 6;2(4):235-244
pubmed: 28794738