Precision of 2 Low-dose Abdomen/Pelvis Cone Beam Computed Tomography Protocols for Alignment to Bone and Soft Tissue in Pediatric Patients Receiving Image Guided Radiation Therapy.
Abdomen
/ diagnostic imaging
Bone and Bones
/ diagnostic imaging
Child
Child, Preschool
Cone-Beam Computed Tomography
/ methods
Humans
Infant
Neoplasms
/ radiotherapy
Pelvis
/ diagnostic imaging
Radiotherapy Dosage
Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted
/ methods
Radiotherapy, Image-Guided
/ methods
Journal
Practical radiation oncology
ISSN: 1879-8519
Titre abrégé: Pract Radiat Oncol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101558279
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
May 2019
May 2019
Historique:
received:
16
11
2018
revised:
05
01
2019
accepted:
10
01
2019
pubmed:
27
1
2019
medline:
14
9
2019
entrez:
27
1
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To evaluate the precision of 2 low-dose cone (LD) beam computed tomography (CBCT) protocols to align to bone and soft tissue for pediatric patients receiving image guided radiation therapy (IGRT) to the abdomen and pelvis. Image-quality evaluation was done for 858 CBCT scans from 46 pediatric patients treated with IGRT from January 2015 to December 2017. The evaluations guided the development of 2 significantly dose-reduced protocols, LD-CBCT1 and a further dose-reduced LD-CBCT2. Representative scans from LD-CBCT1 and LD-CBCT2 from 8 patients with at least 1 CBCT scan from both protocols were registered separately to a bone and soft-tissue landmark on the simulation computed tomography scan. Eighteen identical blinded random offsets were applied to each patient's LD-CBCT1 and LD-CBCT2 from a starting registration that was then realigned using rigid registration. The residual offset between the baseline registration and the final registration attempt was calculated and analyzed using a 1-sided, 1 sample t test to evaluate whether LD-CBCT1, delivering a higher dose, was superior to the lower-dose LD-CBCT2 for bone and soft-tissue alignment. In comparing 288 registrations with a bone landmark across 8 patients, no difference was found in the vector magnitude offsets using LD-CBCT 1 (mean [x¯], 0.73 mm; standard deviation [σ], 0.39 mm) and LD-CBCT2 (x¯, 0.74 mm; σ, 0.40 mm; P = .425). Comparing 216 registrations with a soft-tissue landmark across 6 patients, alignment using LD-CBCT2 (x¯, 1.55 mm; σ, 1.08 mm) resulted in larger differences in the vector magnitude of the offsets compared with LD-CBCT1 (x¯, 1.37 mm; σ, 0.74 mm; P = .049). Clinics treating pediatric patients should consider implementing a protocol mirroring LD-CBCT2 for abdomen and pelvis IGRT bone alignment. Further evaluation of the precision of LD-CBCTs for soft-tissue alignment is necessary.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30684586
pii: S1879-8500(19)30006-2
doi: 10.1016/j.prro.2019.01.005
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e307-e313Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier Inc.