Moving into the mainstream: healthcare professionals' views of implementing treatment focussed genetic testing in breast cancer care.
BRCA1 and BRCA2 treatment focussed testing
Clinician perspectives
Mainstreaming
Qualitative analysis
Journal
Familial cancer
ISSN: 1573-7292
Titre abrégé: Fam Cancer
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 100898211
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
07 2019
07 2019
Historique:
pubmed:
29
1
2019
medline:
4
12
2019
entrez:
29
1
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
A proportion of breast cancers are attributable to BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations. Technological advances has meant that mutation testing in newly diagnosed cancer patients can be used to inform treatment plans. Although oncologists increasingly deliver treatment-focused genetic testing (TFGT) as part of mainstream ovarian cancer care, we know little about non-genetics specialists' views about offering genetic testing to newly diagnosed breast cancer patients. This study sought to determine genetics and non-genetics specialists' views of a proposal to mainstream BRCA1 and 2 testing in newly diagnosed breast cancer patients. Qualitative interview study. Nineteen healthcare professionals currently responsible for offering TFGT in a standard (triage + referral) pathway (breast surgeons + clinical genetics team) and oncologists preparing to offer TFGT to breast cancer patients in a mainstreamed pathway participated in in-depth interviews. Genetics and non-genetics professionals' perceptions of mainstreaming are influenced by their views of: their clinical roles and responsibilities, the impact of TFGT on their workload and the patient pathway and the perceived relevance of genetic testing for patient care in the short-term. Perceived barriers to mainstreaming may be overcome by: more effective communication between specialities, clearer guidelines/patient pathways and the recruitment of mainstreaming champions.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30689103
doi: 10.1007/s10689-019-00122-y
pii: 10.1007/s10689-019-00122-y
pmc: PMC6560008
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
293-301Références
BMC Cancer. 2015 Nov 25;15:936
pubmed: 26608569
Lancet. 2002 Apr 27;359(9316):1471-7
pubmed: 11988246
J Clin Oncol. 2018 Apr 20;36(12):1218-1224
pubmed: 29528794
Oncotarget. 2017 Jul 18;8(29):47154-47160
pubmed: 28454085
JAMA. 2017 Jun 20;317(23):2402-2416
pubmed: 28632866
Br J Nurs. 2016 Jun 23;25(12):690-4
pubmed: 27345073
BMC Health Serv Res. 2010 May 14;10:125
pubmed: 20470377
Genome Med. 2015 Feb 02;7(1):18
pubmed: 25722743
Gynecol Oncol. 2017 Apr;145(1):130-136
pubmed: 28162234
BMC Med Genomics. 2017 May 22;10(1):35
pubmed: 28532511
Gynecol Oncol. 2011 May 1;121(2):353-7
pubmed: 21324516
Genet Med. 2015 Mar;17(3):169-76
pubmed: 25210938
Fam Cancer. 2015 Jun;14(2):265-72
pubmed: 25391616
Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2017 May;14(5):284-296
pubmed: 27958297
Per Med. 2013 Jul;10(5):431-440
pubmed: 29758836
Nat Med. 2018 May;24(5):628-637
pubmed: 29713086
J Clin Oncol. 2015 Jun 10;33(17):1895-901
pubmed: 25847929
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2009 Oct;14(4):204-11
pubmed: 19770118
J Clin Oncol. 2017 Jul 10;35(20):2232-2239
pubmed: 28402748
Genet Med. 2014 Jan;16(1):60-9
pubmed: 23765051
Cancer. 1996 Jun 1;77(11):2318-24
pubmed: 8635102
Soc Sci Med. 2004 Jul;59(2):223-33
pubmed: 15110415
J Med Genet. 2019 Mar;56(3):195-198
pubmed: 29535157
Arch Surg. 2003 Dec;138(12):1323-8; discussion 1329
pubmed: 14662532
JAMA. 2015 Sep 8;314(10):997-8
pubmed: 26203642