Current strategies for the targeted treatment of high-grade serous epithelial ovarian cancer and relevance of BRCA mutational status.
BRCA
Bevacizumab
DNA damage repair
Olaparib
Ovarian cancer
PARP inhibitor
Synthetic lethality
Journal
Journal of ovarian research
ISSN: 1757-2215
Titre abrégé: J Ovarian Res
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101474849
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
28 Jan 2019
28 Jan 2019
Historique:
received:
10
10
2018
accepted:
17
01
2019
entrez:
30
1
2019
pubmed:
30
1
2019
medline:
16
2
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Epithelial ovarian cancer is the most lethal gynecologic malignancy. In most women, it is diagnosed at an advanced stage, which largely explains the poor prognosis of this malignancy. Germline mutations of the genes BRCA1 and BRCA2, which encode proteins essential for the repair of double-strand DNA breaks through homologous recombination, lead to increased cancer predisposition. BRCA mutations are present in approximately 14% of epithelial ovarian cancers. Somatic BRCA mutations have also been described. Current first-line treatment of high-grade epithelial ovarian cancer includes debulking surgery followed by combination chemotherapy, usually carboplatin and paclitaxel. Ovarian cancer is highly sensitive to chemotherapy, in particular to platinum drugs. Most patient will achieve remission with initial chemotherapy, but most will eventually experience disease recurrence. Targeted therapies, including the anti-angiogenic agent bevacizumab and oral poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors, have been recently approved for the treatment of ovarian cancer, based on the results from randomized clinical trials showing significant benefits in terms of progression-free survival, with acceptable tolerability and no detrimental effects on quality of life. Olaparib, the first PARP inhibitor to be granted approval, is currently indicated as maintenance monotherapy in ovarian cancer patients with relapsed disease and mutated BRCA who have achieved a complete or partial response to platinum-based chemotherapy. The analysis of BRCA mutational status has, therefore, also become crucial for therapeutic decisions. Such advances are making personalized treatment of ovarian cancer feasible. Here we briefly review treatments for platinum-sensitive, high-grade serous epithelial ovarian cancer that are currently available in Italy, with a focus on targeted therapies and the relevance of BRCA mutational analysis. Based on the evidence and on current guidelines, we propose strategies for the tailored treatment of patients with relapsed ovarian cancer that take into account BRCA mutational status and the treatment received in the first-line setting.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30691488
doi: 10.1186/s13048-019-0484-6
pii: 10.1186/s13048-019-0484-6
pmc: PMC6348631
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antineoplastic Agents
0
BRCA1 Protein
0
BRCA1 protein, human
0
BRCA2 Protein
0
BRCA2 protein, human
0
Carboplatin
BG3F62OND5
Paclitaxel
P88XT4IS4D
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
9Références
Am J Pathol. 2004 May;164(5):1511-8
pubmed: 15111296
Nat Rev Cancer. 2004 Oct;4(10):814-9
pubmed: 15510162
Nat Rev Cancer. 2005 Sep;5(9):689-98
pubmed: 16110319
BMC Cancer. 2008 Jan 22;8:17
pubmed: 18208621
J Clin Oncol. 2009 Mar 20;27(9):1419-25
pubmed: 19224846
CA Cancer J Clin. 2009 Jul-Aug;59(4):225-49
pubmed: 19474385
Lancet. 2009 Oct 17;374(9698):1331-8
pubmed: 19767092
Lancet. 2009 Oct 17;374(9698):1371-82
pubmed: 19793610
Ann Oncol. 2011 Jan;22(1):39-48
pubmed: 20643862
Lancet. 2010 Oct 2;376(9747):1155-63
pubmed: 20888993
CA Cancer J Clin. 2011 May-Jun;61(3):183-203
pubmed: 21521830
Hum Pathol. 2011 Jul;42(7):918-31
pubmed: 21683865
Nature. 2011 Jun 29;474(7353):609-15
pubmed: 21720365
N Engl J Med. 2011 Dec 29;365(26):2473-83
pubmed: 22204724
N Engl J Med. 2011 Dec 29;365(26):2484-96
pubmed: 22204725
N Engl J Med. 2012 Apr 12;366(15):1382-92
pubmed: 22452356
J Clin Oncol. 2012 Jun 10;30(17):2039-45
pubmed: 22529265
J Clin Oncol. 2012 Jul 20;30(21):2654-63
pubmed: 22711857
J Clin Oncol. 2014 May 1;32(13):1302-8
pubmed: 24637997
Lancet Oncol. 2014 Jul;15(8):852-61
pubmed: 24882434
Lancet Oncol. 2014 Oct;15(11):1207-14
pubmed: 25218906
Gynecol Oncol. 2015 Oct;139(1):10-6
pubmed: 26271155
Br J Cancer. 2015 Dec 15;113 Suppl 1:S3-9
pubmed: 26669452
N Engl J Med. 2016 Feb 25;374(8):738-48
pubmed: 26933849
Eur J Hum Genet. 2016 Sep;24 Suppl 1:S3-9
pubmed: 27514841
Lancet Oncol. 2016 Nov;17(11):1579-1589
pubmed: 27617661
N Engl J Med. 2016 Dec;375(22):2154-2164
pubmed: 27717299
Lancet Oncol. 2017 Jan;18(1):75-87
pubmed: 27908594
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2017 Jan;15(1):9-20
pubmed: 28040716
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2017 May;27(4):668-674
pubmed: 28441250
Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2017 Jun;114:153-165
pubmed: 28477743
Lancet Oncol. 2017 Sep;18(9):1274-1284
pubmed: 28754483
Lancet. 2017 Oct 28;390(10106):1949-1961
pubmed: 28916367
N Engl J Med. 2018 Jan 18;378(3):230-240
pubmed: 29342393
N Engl J Med. 2018 Dec 27;379(26):2495-2505
pubmed: 30345884
N Engl J Med. 1996 Nov 7;335(19):1413-6
pubmed: 8875917