Longitudinal multimodal imaging and clinical endpoints for frontotemporal dementia clinical trials.
Journal
Brain : a journal of neurology
ISSN: 1460-2156
Titre abrégé: Brain
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0372537
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 02 2019
01 02 2019
Historique:
received:
04
08
2017
accepted:
02
11
2018
entrez:
31
1
2019
pubmed:
31
1
2019
medline:
20
9
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Frontotemporal dementia refers to a group of progressive neurodegenerative syndromes usually caused by the accumulation of pathological tau or TDP-43 proteins. The effects of these proteins in the brain are complex, and each can present with several different clinical syndromes. Clinical efficacy trials of drugs targeting these proteins must use endpoints that are meaningful to all participants despite the variability in symptoms across patients. There are many candidate clinical measures, including neuropsychological scores and functional measures. Brain imaging is another potentially attractive outcome that can be precisely quantified and provides evidence of disease modification. Most imaging studies in frontotemporal dementia have been cross-sectional, and few have compared longitudinal changes in cortical volume with changes in other measures such as perfusion and white matter integrity. The current study characterized longitudinal changes in 161 patients with three frontotemporal dementia syndromes: behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia (n = 77) and the semantic (n = 45) and non-fluent (n = 39) variants of primary progressive aphasia. Visits included comprehensive neuropsychological and functional assessment, structural MRI (3 T), diffusion tensor imaging, and arterial spin labelled perfusion imaging. The goal was to identify measures that are appropriate as clinical trial outcomes for each group, as well as those that might be appropriate for trials that would include more than one of these groups. Linear mixed effects models were used to estimate changes in each measure, and to examine the correlation between imaging and clinical changes. Sample sizes were estimated based on the observed effects for theoretical clinical trials using bootstrapping techniques to provide 95% confidence intervals for these estimates. Declines in functional and neuropsychological measures, as well as frontal and temporal cortical volumes and white matter microstructure were detected in all groups. Imaging changes were statistically significantly correlated with, and explained a substantial portion of variance in, the change in most clinical measures. Perfusion and diffusion tensor imaging accounted for variation in clinical decline beyond volume alone. Sample size estimates for atrophy and diffusion imaging were comparable to clinical measures. Corpus callosal fractional anisotropy led to the lowest sample size estimates for all three syndromes. These findings provide further guidance on selection of trial endpoints for studies in frontotemporal dementia and support the use of neuroimaging, particularly structural and diffusion weighted imaging, as biomarkers. Diffusion and perfusion imaging appear to offer additional utility for explaining clinical change beyond the variance explained by volume alone, arguing for considering multimodal imaging in treatment trials.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30698757
pii: 5303707
doi: 10.1093/brain/awy319
pmc: PMC6351779
doi:
Types de publication
Clinical Trial
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
443-459Subventions
Organisme : NIA NIH HHS
ID : P50 AG023501
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIA NIH HHS
ID : P30 AG062421
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIA NIH HHS
ID : U01 AG052943
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIA NIH HHS
ID : P01 AG019724
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIDCD NIH HHS
ID : K24 DC015544
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIA NIH HHS
ID : R01 AG055121
Pays : United States
Organisme : NINDS NIH HHS
ID : R56 NS050915
Pays : United States
Organisme : NINDS NIH HHS
ID : R01 NS050915
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIA NIH HHS
ID : K08 AG052648
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIA NIH HHS
ID : R01 AG032289
Pays : United States
Références
J Gerontol. 1982 May;37(3):323-9
pubmed: 7069156
Brain. 2011 Sep;134(Pt 9):2456-77
pubmed: 21810890
Arch Neurol. 2000 May;57(5):675-80
pubmed: 10815133
Psychiatry (Edgmont). 2007 Jul;4(7):28-37
pubmed: 20526405
Neurology. 2014 Sep 23;83(13):1184-91
pubmed: 25165386
Cell. 2017 Feb 9;168(4):584-599
pubmed: 28187282
Nature. 2018 Feb 8;554(7691):189-194
pubmed: 29420467
J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2017 Jan;23(1):34-43
pubmed: 27751195
Ann Neurol. 2004 Mar;55(3):335-46
pubmed: 14991811
Brain Behav. 2017 Mar 23;7(4):e00675
pubmed: 28413716
Brain. 2008 Nov;131(Pt 11):2957-68
pubmed: 18829698
J Neurochem. 2016 Aug;138 Suppl 1:211-21
pubmed: 27306957
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2012 Apr;83(4):358-64
pubmed: 22399793
Neurology. 2009 May 26;72(21):1843-9
pubmed: 19470967
JAMA Neurol. 2016 Sep 1;73(9):1078-88
pubmed: 27429218
J Psychiatr Res. 1975 Nov;12(3):189-98
pubmed: 1202204
NeuroRx. 2004 Apr;1(2):189-95
pubmed: 15717019
Pharm Stat. 2015 Sep-Oct;14(5):418-26
pubmed: 26223663
Neurology. 2010 Feb 23;74(8):666-73
pubmed: 20177120
PLoS One. 2013 Jul 18;8(7):e66932
pubmed: 23874403
PLoS One. 2015 Jul 02;10(7):e0112045
pubmed: 26135795
Semin Neurol. 2017 Oct;37(5):510-537
pubmed: 29207412
J Alzheimers Dis. 2013;33(2):431-44
pubmed: 22976075
J Alzheimers Dis. 2016;51(3):775-82
pubmed: 26890749
Semin Neurol. 2013 Sep;33(4):336-41
pubmed: 24234354
Neurology. 1998 Dec;51(6):1546-54
pubmed: 9855500
Neurology. 2006 Oct 10;67(7):1215-20
pubmed: 17030755
Brain Imaging Behav. 2016 Dec;10(4):1148-1159
pubmed: 26572145
Lancet Neurol. 2013 Feb;12(2):149-56
pubmed: 23290598
Neuroimage Clin. 2015 Aug 18;12:332-40
pubmed: 27547726
Ann Neurol. 2015 Jan;77(1):33-46
pubmed: 25363208
Alzheimers Res Ther. 2016 May 12;8(1):18
pubmed: 27176461
Perspect Clin Res. 2010 Apr;1(2):67-9
pubmed: 21829786
Neurology. 2011 Mar 15;76(11):1006-14
pubmed: 21325651
Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2017 Aug 1;9(8):
pubmed: 28289062
Cogn Behav Neurol. 2003 Dec;16(4):211-8
pubmed: 14665820
Neurology. 1994 Dec;44(12):2308-14
pubmed: 7991117
Alzheimers Dement. 2013 Mar;9(2):189-98
pubmed: 23062850
Neuroimage Clin. 2016 Aug 03;12:460-5
pubmed: 27625986
J Psychiatr Res. 1982-1983;17(1):37-49
pubmed: 7183759
Ann Clin Transl Neurol. 2016 Aug 30;3(10):740-751
pubmed: 27752510
Stat Med. 2012 Nov 10;31(25):2973-84
pubmed: 22711298
J Alzheimers Dis. 2015;49(3):853-61
pubmed: 26484929
J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2012 Sep;18(5):834-44
pubmed: 22835330
Lancet Neurol. 2015 Mar;14(3):253-62
pubmed: 25662776
Expert Opin Emerg Drugs. 2016 Dec;21(4):377-391
pubmed: 27678025
Neurology. 1993 Nov;43(11):2412-4
pubmed: 8232972
Hum Brain Mapp. 2014 Jul;35(7):3547-57
pubmed: 25050433
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2011 Feb;12(2):65-72
pubmed: 21193853
Neuroimage Clin. 2016 Dec 10;14:286-297
pubmed: 28337409