Improved Control of Secondary Hyperparathyroidism in Hemodialysis Patients Switching from Oral Cinacalcet to Intravenous Etelcalcetide, Especially in Nonadherent Patients.
Administration, Intravenous
Administration, Oral
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Calcium
/ blood
Calcium-Regulating Hormones and Agents
/ administration & dosage
Cinacalcet
/ administration & dosage
Female
Humans
Hyperparathyroidism, Secondary
/ blood
Male
Middle Aged
Patient Compliance
Peptides
/ administration & dosage
Prospective Studies
Renal Dialysis
Young Adult
Etelcalcetide
Hemodialysis
Intravenous calcimimetic
Secondary hyperparathyroidism
Journal
Blood purification
ISSN: 1421-9735
Titre abrégé: Blood Purif
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 8402040
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2019
2019
Historique:
received:
11
09
2018
accepted:
02
01
2019
pubmed:
31
1
2019
medline:
24
1
2020
entrez:
31
1
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Etelcalcetide is a novel second-generation calcimimetic that, because of its intravenous administration, could improve treatment adherence in secondary hyperparathyroidism (SHPT). The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of etelcalcetide compared with that of cinacalcet in controlling SHPT in patients under hemodialysis. A prospective observational study was performed in 29 patients with SHPT under hemodialysis who switched from cinacalcet to etelcalcetide with a follow-up of 6 months. A survey was conducted of adherence to the oral calcimimetic. The primary end-point of the study was to assess whether etelcalcetide was more effective than cinacalcet in controlling SHPT. After the switch of treatment, none of the patients developed clinical intolerance or new adverse effects. Etelcalcetide was more effective than cinacalcet in controlling intact parathyroid hormone (iPTH), with an overall decrease in iPTH levels that was significant from the second month. Average calcium levels remained within the normal range, with a higher percentage of hypocalcemia with etelcalcetide (6.9 vs. 13.8%), which was asymptomatic in all cases. Patients who were nonadherent to cinacalcet (38%) showed a significant reduction in calcium and iPTH during follow-up with etelcalcetide. The adherent group (62%) also showed a trend to lower iPTH levels reaching statistical significance after 5 months of follow-up. The dose conversion factor for the switch from cinacalcet to etelcalcetide was etelcalcetide/session = 0.111*mg cinacalcet/day + 0.96, R2 = 0.57. Etelcalcetide was more effective than cinacalcet in this patient population, especially in the nonadherent subgroup, leading to better SHPT control without adverse effects.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Etelcalcetide is a novel second-generation calcimimetic that, because of its intravenous administration, could improve treatment adherence in secondary hyperparathyroidism (SHPT). The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of etelcalcetide compared with that of cinacalcet in controlling SHPT in patients under hemodialysis.
METHODS
A prospective observational study was performed in 29 patients with SHPT under hemodialysis who switched from cinacalcet to etelcalcetide with a follow-up of 6 months. A survey was conducted of adherence to the oral calcimimetic. The primary end-point of the study was to assess whether etelcalcetide was more effective than cinacalcet in controlling SHPT.
RESULTS
After the switch of treatment, none of the patients developed clinical intolerance or new adverse effects. Etelcalcetide was more effective than cinacalcet in controlling intact parathyroid hormone (iPTH), with an overall decrease in iPTH levels that was significant from the second month. Average calcium levels remained within the normal range, with a higher percentage of hypocalcemia with etelcalcetide (6.9 vs. 13.8%), which was asymptomatic in all cases. Patients who were nonadherent to cinacalcet (38%) showed a significant reduction in calcium and iPTH during follow-up with etelcalcetide. The adherent group (62%) also showed a trend to lower iPTH levels reaching statistical significance after 5 months of follow-up. The dose conversion factor for the switch from cinacalcet to etelcalcetide was etelcalcetide/session = 0.111*mg cinacalcet/day + 0.96, R2 = 0.57.
CONCLUSIONS
Etelcalcetide was more effective than cinacalcet in this patient population, especially in the nonadherent subgroup, leading to better SHPT control without adverse effects.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30699421
pii: 000496562
doi: 10.1159/000496562
doi:
Substances chimiques
Calcium-Regulating Hormones and Agents
0
Peptides
0
etelcalcetide hydrochloride
72PT5993DU
Calcium
SY7Q814VUP
Cinacalcet
UAZ6V7728S
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
106-114Informations de copyright
© 2019 S. Karger AG, Basel.