POLST Registration and Associated Outcomes Among Veterans With Advanced-Stage Lung Cancer.
EOL care
advance care planning
hospice enrollment
location of death
lung cancer
palliative care
physician orders for life-sustaining treatment
Journal
The American journal of hospice & palliative care
ISSN: 1938-2715
Titre abrégé: Am J Hosp Palliat Care
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9008229
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jul 2019
Jul 2019
Historique:
pubmed:
1
2
2019
medline:
18
12
2019
entrez:
1
2
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The Oregon Physicians Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST) Program allows patients with advanced illness to document end-of-life (EOL) care preferences. We examined the characteristics and associated EOL care among Veterans with and without a registered POLST. Retrospective, cohort study of advanced-stage (IIIB and IV) patients with lung cancer who were diagnosed between 2008 and 2013 as recorded in the VA Central Cancer Registry. We examined a subgroup of 346 Oregon residents. We obtained clinical and sociodemographic variables from the VA Corporate Data Warehouse and EOL preferences from the Oregon POLST Registry. We compared hospice enrollment and place of death between those with and without a registered POLST. Twenty-two (n = 77) percent of our cohort had registered POLST forms. Compared to those without a registered POLST, Veterans with a POLST had a higher income ($51 456 vs $48 882) and longer time between diagnosis and death (223 days vs 119 days). Those with a registered POLST were more likely to be enrolled in hospice (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 2.37, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.01-5.54) and less likely to die in a VA facility (aOR = 0.27, 95% CI: 0.12-0.59). There was low submission to the POLST Registry among Veterans who received care in Veterans' Health Administration. Veterans who had a registered POLST were more likely to be enrolled in hospice and less likely to die in a VA care setting. The POLST may improve metrics of high-quality EOL care; however, opportunities for improvement in submission and implementation within the VA exist.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30700127
doi: 10.1177/1049909118824543
pmc: PMC6613638
mid: NIHMS1027388
doi:
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
564-570Subventions
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : K07 CA190706
Pays : United States
Références
JAMA. 2000 Nov 15;284(19):2476-82
pubmed: 11074777
J Palliat Med. 2000 Fall;3(3):287-300
pubmed: 15859670
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005 May;53(5):819-23
pubmed: 15877557
J Clin Epidemiol. 2005 Jun;58(6):595-602
pubmed: 15878473
J Clin Epidemiol. 1992 Jun;45(6):613-9
pubmed: 1607900
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2008 Jan;56(1):124-9
pubmed: 18031485
J Palliat Med. 2009 Feb;12(2):133-41
pubmed: 19207056
Med Care. 2011 Oct;49(10):911-7
pubmed: 21685810
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2011 Nov;59(11):2091-9
pubmed: 22092007
BMC Anesthesiol. 2012 Sep 13;12:21
pubmed: 22974239
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2013 Feb;61(2):209-14
pubmed: 23350921
Resuscitation. 2014 Apr;85(4):480-5
pubmed: 24407052
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2014 Jul;62(7):1246-51
pubmed: 24913043
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2015 Nov;50(5):650-8
pubmed: 26162508
J Palliat Med. 2016 Sep;19(9):957-63
pubmed: 27228478
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2016 Aug;64(8):1739-41
pubmed: 27345823
Cancer. 2018 Jan 15;124(2):426-433
pubmed: 29023648
JAMA. 2018 Jul 17;320(3):264-271
pubmed: 29946682
J Am Geriatr Soc. 1998 Sep;46(9):1097-102
pubmed: 9736102