Thalidomide maintenance therapy in Japanese myeloma patients: a multicenter, phase II clinical trial (COMET study).
Adverse events
Efficacy
Maintenance
Multiple myeloma
Thalidomide
Journal
International journal of hematology
ISSN: 1865-3774
Titre abrégé: Int J Hematol
Pays: Japan
ID NLM: 9111627
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Apr 2019
Apr 2019
Historique:
received:
16
10
2018
accepted:
23
01
2019
revised:
20
01
2019
pubmed:
1
2
2019
medline:
18
4
2019
entrez:
1
2
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
A prospective, multicenter, phase II study was performed to assess the efficacy and safety of thalidomide maintenance therapy at different doses in Japanese multiple myeloma (MM) patients. This study included 34 patients (median age, 74 years) who were previously treated with not more than three prior therapies and whose response status was evaluated as at least stable disease. They were randomized into Group A (no maintenance; 12 patients), Group B (50 mg thalidomide maintenance; 12 patients), and Group C (100 mg thalidomide maintenance; 10 patients), respectively. Thalidomide maintenance therapy resulted in improved depth of response in three cases (13.6%) and sustained response after induction therapy in eight cases (36.4%). Two-year progression-free survival (PFS) was 25.0%, 33.3%, and 77.8% in Groups A, B, and C, respectively, and was significantly higher in Group C than in Group A (p = 0.005). There was no difference in the incidence of hematological or non-hematological adverse events between Groups B and C. The current study demonstrates that maintenance with daily thalidomide at 100 mg, but not 50 mg, improved depth of response and prolonged PFS, and that this treatment was feasible for use in Japanese MM patients.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30701467
doi: 10.1007/s12185-019-02607-z
pii: 10.1007/s12185-019-02607-z
doi:
Substances chimiques
Thalidomide
4Z8R6ORS6L
Types de publication
Clinical Trial, Phase II
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Randomized Controlled Trial
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
409-417Commentaires et corrections
Type : ErratumIn
Références
Br J Haematol. 2003 Jun;121(5):749-57
pubmed: 12780789
N Engl J Med. 2003 Dec 25;349(26):2495-502
pubmed: 14695409
Blood. 2006 Nov 15;108(10):3289-94
pubmed: 16873668
Blood. 2008 Oct 15;112(8):3115-21
pubmed: 18492953
Blood. 2008 Oct 15;112(8):3107-14
pubmed: 18505783
J Clin Oncol. 2009 Apr 10;27(11):1788-93
pubmed: 19273705
Blood. 2010 Feb 11;115(6):1113-20
pubmed: 19880501
Blood. 2010 Sep 2;116(9):1405-12
pubmed: 20448107
J Clin Oncol. 2010 Jul 1;28(19):3160-6
pubmed: 20516439
Blood. 2011 May 5;117(18):4691-5
pubmed: 21292775
N Engl J Med. 2011 Mar 17;364(11):1046-60
pubmed: 21410373
Oncologist. 2011;16(4):388-403
pubmed: 21441574
N Engl J Med. 2012 May 10;366(19):1759-69
pubmed: 22571200
N Engl J Med. 2012 May 10;366(19):1770-81
pubmed: 22571201
N Engl J Med. 2012 May 10;366(19):1782-91
pubmed: 22571202
Clin Cancer Res. 2013 Nov 1;19(21):6030-8
pubmed: 23995858
N Engl J Med. 2014 Sep 4;371(10):895-905
pubmed: 25184862
N Engl J Med. 2014 Sep 4;371(10):906-17
pubmed: 25184863
Blood. 2015 Sep 10;126(11):1294-301
pubmed: 26157076
Lancet Haematol. 2014 Dec;1(3):e112-9
pubmed: 27029229
Int J Hematol. 2018 May;107(5):541-550
pubmed: 29380179