Dietary intake and breast cancer risk in black South African women: the South African Breast Cancer study.
BC breast cancer
QFFQ quantified FFQ
WCRF World Cancer Research Fund
Black women
Breast cancer
Dietary intake
South Africa
Journal
The British journal of nutrition
ISSN: 1475-2662
Titre abrégé: Br J Nutr
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0372547
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
03 2019
03 2019
Historique:
pubmed:
2
2
2019
medline:
25
12
2019
entrez:
2
2
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Incidence rates of breast cancer (BC) are increasing in South Africa. The aim of this study was to investigate the association between dietary intake and BC risk in black South African women. The study population included 396 BC cases and 396 population-based controls matched on age and residence, participating in the South African Breast Cancer study. Diet was assessed using a validated quantified FFQ from which twelve energy-adjusted food groups were formed and analysed. OR were estimated using conditional logistic regressions, adjusted for confounding factors, comparing highest v. lowest median intake. Fresh fruit consumption showed an inverse association with BC risk (OR=0·3, 95 % CI 0·12, 0·80) in premenopausal women, whilst red and organ meat consumption showed an overall inverse association with BC risk (OR=0·6, 95 % CI 0·49, 0·94 and OR=0·6, 95 % CI 0·47, 0·91). Savoury food consumption (sauces, soups and snacks) were positively associated with BC risk in postmenopausal women (OR=2·1, 95 % CI 1·15, 4·07). Oestrogen receptor-positive stratification showed an inverse association with BC risk and consumption of nuts and seeds (OR=0·2, 95 % CI 0·58, 0·86). Based on these results, it is recommended that black South African women follow a diet with more fruit and vegetables together with a decreased consumption of less energy-dense, micronutrient-poor foods such as savoury foods. More research is necessary to investigate the association between BC risk and red and organ meat consumption. Affordable and practical methods regarding these recommendations should be implemented within health intervention strategies.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30704540
pii: S0007114518003744
doi: 10.1017/S0007114518003744
pmc: PMC6521785
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
591-600Subventions
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : R01 CA192627
Pays : United States
Références
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2000 Sep;32(9 Suppl):S498-504
pubmed: 10993420
Public Health Nutr. 2001 Feb;4(1):45-51
pubmed: 11315680
BMC Public Health. 2011 Oct 13;11:801
pubmed: 21995618
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2015 May;151(1):191-8
pubmed: 25893586
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2017 Jul;117(7):1019-1022
pubmed: 28465171
Br J Cancer. 2007 Apr 10;96(7):1139-46
pubmed: 17406351
Evol Appl. 2017 May 20;10(7):651-657
pubmed: 28717385
Public Health Nutr. 2002 Feb;5(1A):157-62
pubmed: 12027279
J Epidemiol. 2016;26(2):92-7
pubmed: 26477994
Eur J Cancer Prev. 2011 Mar;20(2):132-9
pubmed: 21160428
Food Chem. 2018 Jan 1;238:94-100
pubmed: 28867108
Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2000 Aug;24(8):982-8
pubmed: 10951536
Int J Cancer. 2018 Jan 15;142(2):230-237
pubmed: 28913916
Cancer Causes Control. 2016 Apr;27(4):527-43
pubmed: 26898200
Salud Publica Mex. 2009;51 Suppl 2:s172-80
pubmed: 19967272
Public Health Nutr. 2005 Aug;8(5):491-500
pubmed: 16153330
Lancet Glob Health. 2016 Dec;4(12):e923-e935
pubmed: 27855871
Public Health Nutr. 2001 Feb;4(1):53-62
pubmed: 11315681
J Hum Nutr Diet. 2000 Jun;13(3):205-218
pubmed: 12383127
Public Health Nutr. 2005 Aug;8(5):509-19
pubmed: 16153332
Lancet Oncol. 2015 Aug;16(8):e414-21
pubmed: 26248849
Nutr Clin Pract. 2012 Oct;27(5):599-612
pubmed: 22878362
Br J Cancer. 2014 Sep 23;111(7):1454-62
pubmed: 25101568
Nutrition. 2011 Jan;27(1):55-58
pubmed: 20381314
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2014 Apr;1311:88-101
pubmed: 24725148
Nutrients. 2017 Dec 07;9(12):
pubmed: 29215604
Maturitas. 2017 Sep;103:8-15
pubmed: 28778338