Bone Graft Substitutes: Current Concepts and Future Expectations.
Bone graft substitute
allograft
autograft
Journal
The Journal of hand surgery
ISSN: 1531-6564
Titre abrégé: J Hand Surg Am
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7609631
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jun 2019
Jun 2019
Historique:
received:
04
06
2018
revised:
25
09
2018
accepted:
23
10
2018
pubmed:
2
2
2019
medline:
5
3
2020
entrez:
2
2
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Owing to its osteoinductive and osteoconductive properties and the presence of osteogenic cells, freshly harvested autologous bone graft is the gold standard for skeletal reconstruction where there is inadequate native bone. Whereas these characteristics are difficult to replicate, engineered, commercially available bone graft substitutes aim to achieve a comparable osseoregenerative profile. This work furnishes the reader with an understanding of the predominant classes of bone graft substitutes available for reconstruction of upper extremity bone defects following trauma or oncological surgery. We review bone graft substitutes with respect to their mechanisms of action, their advantages and disadvantages, and their indications and contraindications. We provide examples of bone graft substitutes in clinical use and outline comparative costs. We also describe the future directions for this specific aspect of reconstructive surgery with a focus on the role of bioactive glass.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30704784
pii: S0363-5023(18)30766-4
doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2018.10.032
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
13-93 bioactive glass
0
Bone Morphogenetic Proteins
0
Bone Substitutes
0
Calcium Phosphates
0
Polymethyl Methacrylate
9011-14-7
Durapatite
91D9GV0Z28
tricalcium phosphate
K4C08XP666
Calcium Sulfate
WAT0DDB505
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
497-505.e2Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2019 American Society for Surgery of the Hand. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.