A novel nonosteocytic regulatory mechanism of bone modeling.
Animals
Biomechanical Phenomena
Bone Remodeling
/ genetics
Bone and Bones
/ cytology
Chondrocytes
/ cytology
Collagen Type I
/ genetics
Feedback, Physiological
Fish Proteins
/ genetics
Gene Expression Regulation
Glycoproteins
/ genetics
Humans
Mechanotransduction, Cellular
/ genetics
Oryzias
/ genetics
Osteoblasts
/ cytology
Osteocytes
Osteogenesis
/ genetics
Protein Isoforms
/ genetics
Species Specificity
Swimming
/ physiology
Zebrafish
/ genetics
Zebrafish Proteins
/ genetics
Journal
PLoS biology
ISSN: 1545-7885
Titre abrégé: PLoS Biol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101183755
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
02 2019
02 2019
Historique:
received:
19
08
2018
accepted:
22
01
2019
revised:
13
02
2019
pubmed:
2
2
2019
medline:
26
11
2019
entrez:
2
2
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Osteocytes, cells forming an elaborate network within the bones of most vertebrate taxa, are thought to be the master regulators of bone modeling, a process of coordinated, local bone-tissue deposition and removal that keeps bone strains at safe levels throughout life. Neoteleost fish, however, lack osteocytes and yet are known to be capable of bone modeling, although no osteocyte-independent modeling regulatory mechanism has so far been described. Here, we characterize a novel, to our knowledge, bone-modeling regulatory mechanism in a fish species (medaka), showing that although lacking osteocytes (i.e., internal mechanosensors), when loaded, medaka bones model in mechanically directed ways, successfully reducing high tissue strains. We establish that as in mammals, modeling in medaka is regulated by the SOST gene, demonstrating a mechanistic link between skeletal loading, SOST down-regulation, and intense bone deposition. However, whereas mammalian SOST is expressed almost exclusively by osteocytes, in both medaka and zebrafish (a species with osteocytic bones), SOST is expressed by a variety of nonosteocytic cells, none of which reside within the bone bulk. These findings argue that in fishes (and perhaps other vertebrates), nonosteocytic skeletal cells are both sensors and responders, shouldering duties believed exclusive to osteocytes. This previously unrecognized, SOST-dependent, osteocyte-independent mechanism challenges current paradigms of osteocyte exclusivity in bone-modeling regulation, suggesting the existence of multivariate feedback networks in bone modeling-perhaps also in mammalian bones-and thus arguing for the possibility of untapped potential for cell targets in bone therapeutics.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30707688
doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000140
pii: PBIOLOGY-D-18-00482
pmc: PMC6373971
doi:
Substances chimiques
Collagen Type I
0
Fish Proteins
0
Glycoproteins
0
Protein Isoforms
0
Sost protein, zebrafish
0
Zebrafish Proteins
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e3000140Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
J Biomech. 2010 Jan 5;43(1):108-18
pubmed: 19818443
BMC Dev Biol. 2012 Oct 09;12:28
pubmed: 23043290
Acta Anat (Basel). 1961;46:343-62
pubmed: 14476542
J Biol Chem. 2004 Apr 2;279(14):13849-58
pubmed: 14739291
Toxicol Sci. 2017 Feb;155(2):485-496
pubmed: 28077779
PLoS One. 2012;7(4):e34072
pubmed: 22529905
BMC Physiol. 2010 Jul 06;10:12
pubmed: 20604915
Cell Rep. 2017 Aug 22;20(8):1775-1783
pubmed: 28834742
Bonekey Rep. 2013 May 01;2:343
pubmed: 24422081
J Biol Chem. 2004 Aug 27;279(35):36293-8
pubmed: 15199066
Arthritis Rheum. 2013 Mar;65(3):721-31
pubmed: 23233270
FEBS Lett. 2011 Aug 4;585(15):2450-4
pubmed: 21723865
Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2011 Jul;19(7):874-85
pubmed: 21619935
BMC Evol Biol. 2012 Mar 05;12:27
pubmed: 22390748
Calcif Tissue Int. 2010 Aug;87(2):99-107
pubmed: 20473488
Endocr Rev. 2013 Oct;34(5):658-90
pubmed: 23612223
EMBO J. 2003 Dec 1;22(23):6267-76
pubmed: 14633986
J Dent Res. 2009 Jun;88(6):569-74
pubmed: 19587164
Methods Mol Biol. 2011;770:211-41
pubmed: 21805266
Acta Biomater. 2015 Feb;13:311-23
pubmed: 25449924
J Exp Biol. 2015 Nov;218(Pt 22):3559-69
pubmed: 26582932
J Microsc. 2002 Apr;206(Pt 1):33-40
pubmed: 12000561
J Biomech. 2005 Jun;38(6):1239-46
pubmed: 15863108
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2017 Aug;92(3):1702-1719
pubmed: 27862887
FASEB J. 2005 Nov;19(13):1842-4
pubmed: 16123173
Nature. 2014 Sep 4;513(7516):54-8
pubmed: 25162530
J Biomech. 1982;15(3):141-54
pubmed: 7096367
BioDrugs. 2017 Aug;31(4):289-297
pubmed: 28547661
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2009 May;84(2):315-46
pubmed: 19382934
Toxicol Sci. 2007 Feb;95(2):356-68
pubmed: 17093204
J Bone Miner Res. 2011 Feb;26(2):229-38
pubmed: 21254230
J Biol Chem. 2008 Feb 29;283(9):5866-75
pubmed: 18089564
Dev Biol. 2012 Oct 1;370(1):154-63
pubmed: 22884393
Bone. 2017 Mar;96:18-23
pubmed: 27780792
J Theor Biol. 2003 Aug 7;223(3):269-81
pubmed: 12850448
Methods Mol Biol. 2014;1130:203-215
pubmed: 24482175
Bone. 1997 Jun;20(6):527-32
pubmed: 9177866
Crit Rev Eukaryot Gene Expr. 2009;19(4):319-38
pubmed: 19817708
J Exp Biol. 2005 Sep;208(Pt 18):3493-502
pubmed: 16155222
Bone. 2002 May;30(5):781-6
pubmed: 11996920
J Bone Miner Res. 2012 Mar;27(3):563-74
pubmed: 22113822
Dev Biol. 2013 Nov 1;383(1):90-105
pubmed: 23994639
Toxicol Sci. 2012 Jan;125(1):91-104
pubmed: 22020769
Angle Orthod. 2004 Feb;74(1):3-15
pubmed: 15038485
J Anat. 2011 Oct;219(4):490-501
pubmed: 21615400
Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis. 2017 Oct;9(10):263-270
pubmed: 28974988