What's Needed to Develop Strategic Purchasing in Healthcare? Policy Lessons from a Realist Review.
Complementary Theories
Healthcare
Strategic Purchasing
Journal
International journal of health policy and management
ISSN: 2322-5939
Titre abrégé: Int J Health Policy Manag
Pays: Iran
ID NLM: 101619905
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 01 2019
01 01 2019
Historique:
received:
21
02
2018
accepted:
11
09
2018
entrez:
3
2
2019
pubmed:
3
2
2019
medline:
28
7
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
In the context of serious concerns over the affordability of healthcare, various authors and international policy bodies advise that strategic purchasing is a key means of improving health system performance. Such advice is typically informed by theories from the economics of organization (EOO). This paper proposes that these theories are insufficient for a full understanding of strategic purchasing in healthcare, because they focus on safeguarding against poor performance and ignore the coordination and adaptation needed to improve performance. We suggest that insights from other, complementary theories are needed. A realist review method was adopted involving 3 steps: first, drawing upon complementary theories from the EOO and inter-organizational relationships (IOR) perspectives, a theoretical interpretation framework was developed to guide the review; second, a purposive search of scholarly databases to find relevant literature addressing healthcare purchasing; and third, qualitative analysis of the selected texts and thematic synthesis of the results focusing on lessons relevant to 3 key policy objectives taken from the international health policy literature. Texts were included if they provided relevant empirical data and met specified standards of rigour and robustness. A total of 58 texts were included in the final analysis. Lessons for patient empowerment included: the need for clearly defined rights for patients and responsibilities for purchasers, and for these to be enacted through regular patientpurchaser interaction. Lessons for government stewardship included: the need for health strategy to contain specific targets to incentivise purchasers to align with national policy objectives, and for national government actors to build close, trusting relationships with purchasers to facilitate access to local knowledge about needs and priorities. Lessons for provider performance included: provider decision autonomy may drive innovation and efficient resource use, but may also create scope for opportunism, and interdependence likely to be the best power structure to incentivise collaboration needed to drive performance improvement. Using complementary theories suggests a range of general policy lessons for strategic purchasing in healthcare, but further empirical work is needed to explore how far these lessons are a practically useful guide to policy in a variety of healthcare systems, country settings and purchasing process phases.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
In the context of serious concerns over the affordability of healthcare, various authors and international policy bodies advise that strategic purchasing is a key means of improving health system performance. Such advice is typically informed by theories from the economics of organization (EOO). This paper proposes that these theories are insufficient for a full understanding of strategic purchasing in healthcare, because they focus on safeguarding against poor performance and ignore the coordination and adaptation needed to improve performance. We suggest that insights from other, complementary theories are needed.
METHODS
A realist review method was adopted involving 3 steps: first, drawing upon complementary theories from the EOO and inter-organizational relationships (IOR) perspectives, a theoretical interpretation framework was developed to guide the review; second, a purposive search of scholarly databases to find relevant literature addressing healthcare purchasing; and third, qualitative analysis of the selected texts and thematic synthesis of the results focusing on lessons relevant to 3 key policy objectives taken from the international health policy literature. Texts were included if they provided relevant empirical data and met specified standards of rigour and robustness.
RESULTS
A total of 58 texts were included in the final analysis. Lessons for patient empowerment included: the need for clearly defined rights for patients and responsibilities for purchasers, and for these to be enacted through regular patientpurchaser interaction. Lessons for government stewardship included: the need for health strategy to contain specific targets to incentivise purchasers to align with national policy objectives, and for national government actors to build close, trusting relationships with purchasers to facilitate access to local knowledge about needs and priorities. Lessons for provider performance included: provider decision autonomy may drive innovation and efficient resource use, but may also create scope for opportunism, and interdependence likely to be the best power structure to incentivise collaboration needed to drive performance improvement.
CONCLUSION
Using complementary theories suggests a range of general policy lessons for strategic purchasing in healthcare, but further empirical work is needed to explore how far these lessons are a practically useful guide to policy in a variety of healthcare systems, country settings and purchasing process phases.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30709098
doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2018.93
pmc: PMC6358649
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Pagination
4-17Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
© 2019 The Author(s); Published by Kerman University of Medical Sciences. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Références
PLoS One. 2018 Apr 2;13(4):e0195179
pubmed: 29608610
BMC Health Serv Res. 2013;13 Suppl 1:S2
pubmed: 23735008
Health Policy. 2007 Oct;83(2-3):223-35
pubmed: 17379350
BMJ Qual Saf. 2014 Aug;23(8):678-89
pubmed: 24876289
Int J Equity Health. 2017 Dec 28;16(1):216
pubmed: 29282087
Public Adm. 2010;88(3):800-18
pubmed: 20925153
Soc Sci Med. 2017 Apr;179:61-73
pubmed: 28257886
BMJ. 2007 Oct 27;335(7625):858-61
pubmed: 17954518
Health Aff (Millwood). 2011 Sep;30(9):1630-6
pubmed: 21900652
BMC Health Serv Res. 2013;13 Suppl 1:S4
pubmed: 23735082
Br Med Bull. 2011;97:7-15
pubmed: 21257619
J Public Health Med. 1999 Jun;21(2):221-7
pubmed: 10432254
Milbank Q. 2012 Jun;90(2):311-46
pubmed: 22709390
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2005 Jul;10 Suppl 1:21-34
pubmed: 16053581
Soc Sci Med. 2010 Mar;70(5):779-86
pubmed: 20056304
J Health Organ Manag. 2008;22(2):111-28
pubmed: 18700523
Sociol Health Illn. 2008 Sep;30(6):929-43
pubmed: 18761512
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2012 Jan;17 Suppl 1:49-54
pubmed: 22315477
J Health Organ Manag. 2007;21(4-5):393-405
pubmed: 17933371
Qual Saf Health Care. 2010 Oct;19(5):376-82
pubmed: 20724397
Health Expect. 2010 Mar;13(1):73-85
pubmed: 19719537
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2012 Apr;17(2):94-100
pubmed: 22315465
Soc Sci Med. 2002 Jan;54(2):255-66
pubmed: 11824930
Milbank Q. 2001;79(2):281-315
pubmed: 11439467
Health Econ Policy Law. 2010 Jul;5(3):343-63
pubmed: 20478105
Soc Sci Med. 1998 Feb;46(3):357-67
pubmed: 9460817
BMC Health Serv Res. 2013;13 Suppl 1:S5
pubmed: 23735124
Eur J Health Law. 2000 Mar;7(1):1-3
pubmed: 12542023
Health Soc Care Community. 2000 May;8(3):192-200
pubmed: 11560689
BMC Med. 2016 Jun 24;14(1):96
pubmed: 27342217
Syst Rev. 2012 Jun 09;1:28
pubmed: 22681772
BMJ. 2002 Apr 20;324(7343):967-70
pubmed: 11964345
Soc Sci Med. 2011 Nov;73(10):1460-8
pubmed: 22000765
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2012 Jan;17 Suppl 1:16-22
pubmed: 21967822
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2012 Jan;17 Suppl 1:31-9
pubmed: 22315475
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2012 Jan;17 Suppl 1:23-30
pubmed: 21890683