A study of the flexural strength and surface hardness of different materials and technologies for occlusal device fabrication.


Journal

The Journal of prosthetic dentistry
ISSN: 1097-6841
Titre abrégé: J Prosthet Dent
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0376364

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Jun 2019
Historique:
received: 27 02 2018
revised: 24 09 2018
accepted: 24 09 2018
pubmed: 4 2 2019
medline: 27 11 2019
entrez: 4 2 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

With the emergence of digital technologies, new materials have become available for occlusal devices. However, data are scarce about these different materials and technologies and their mechanical properties. The purpose of this in vitro study was to investigate the flexural strength and surface hardness of different materials using different technologies for occlusal device fabrication, with an emphasis on the digital technologies of computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD-CAM) and 3D printing. A total of 140 rectangular specimens were fabricated from two 3D-printed (VarseoWax Splint and Ortho Rigid), 2 CAD-CAM-produced (Ceramill Splintec and CopraDur), and 3 conventional autopolymerizing occlusal device materials (ProBase Cold, Resilit S, and Orthocryl) according to ISO 20795-1:2013. Flexural strength and surface hardness were determined for 10 specimens of each tested material using the 3-point bend test and the Brinell method. The data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and 1-way ANOVA with Bonferroni corrections (α=.05). Surface hardness values ranged from 28.5 ±2.5 MPa to 116.2 ±1.6 MPa. During flexural testing, neither the CopraDur nor the VarseoWax Splint specimens fractured during loading within the end limits of the penetrant's possible movement. Flexural strength values for other groups ranged from 75.0 ±12.0 MPa to 104.9 ±6.2 MPa. Statistical analysis determined significant differences among the tested materials for flexural strength and surface hardness. Mechanical properties among different occlusal device materials were significantly different. Acrylic resins were less flexible than polyamide and nonacrylic occlusal device materials for 3D printing but had higher and more consistent values of surface hardness. Clinicians should consider the different mechanical properties of the available materials when choosing occlusal device materials.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30711296
pii: S0022-3913(18)30912-0
doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.09.022
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

955-959

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2018 Editorial Council for the Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Vladimir Prpic (V)

Doctoral student, School of Dental Medicine, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia.

Ivan Slacanin (I)

Postgraduate student, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Naval Architecture, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia.

Zdravko Schauperl (Z)

Associate Professor, Department for Materials, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Naval Architecture, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia.

Amir Catic (A)

Associate Professor, Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dental Medicine, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia.

Niksa Dulcic (N)

Associate Professor, Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dental Medicine, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia.

Samir Cimic (S)

Assistant Professor, Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dental Medicine, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia. Electronic address: scimic@sfzg.hr.

Articles similaires

Hemiarthroplasty in young patients.

Hazimah Mahmud, Dong Wang, Andra Topan-Rat et al.
1.00
Humans Male Hemiarthroplasty Middle Aged Aged
Silicon Dioxide Water Hot Temperature Compressive Strength X-Ray Diffraction
Nitriles Tensile Strength Materials Testing Gloves, Protective Product Packaging
Calcium Carbonate Sand Powders Construction Materials Materials Testing

Classifications MeSH