The beginning of the end for conventional RECIST - novel therapies require novel imaging approaches.


Journal

Nature reviews. Clinical oncology
ISSN: 1759-4782
Titre abrégé: Nat Rev Clin Oncol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101500077

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
07 2019
Historique:
pubmed: 6 2 2019
medline: 10 7 2019
entrez: 6 2 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Owing to improvements in our understanding of the biological principles of tumour initiation and progression, a wide variety of novel targeted therapies have been developed. Developments in biomedical imaging, however, have not kept pace with these improvements and are still mainly designed to determine lesion size alone, which is reflected in the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST). Imaging approaches currently used for the evaluation of treatment responses in patients with solid tumours, therefore, often fail to detect successful responses to novel targeted agents and might even falsely suggest disease progression, a scenario known as pseudoprogression. The ability to differentiate between responders and nonresponders early in the course of treatment is essential to allowing the early adjustment of treatment regimens. Various imaging approaches targeting a single dedicated tumour feature, as described in the hallmarks of cancer, have been successful in preclinical investigations, and some have been evaluated in pilot clinical trials. However, these approaches have largely not been implemented in clinical practice. In this Review, we describe current biomedical imaging approaches used to monitor responses to treatment in patients receiving novel targeted therapies, including a summary of the most promising future approaches and how these might improve clinical practice.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30718844
doi: 10.1038/s41571-019-0169-5
pii: 10.1038/s41571-019-0169-5
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

442-458

Auteurs

Mirjam Gerwing (M)

Institute of Clinical Radiology, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster, Germany.

Ken Herrmann (K)

Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.

Anne Helfen (A)

Institute of Clinical Radiology, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster, Germany.

Christoph Schliemann (C)

Department of Medicine A, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster, Germany.

Wolfgang E Berdel (WE)

Department of Medicine A, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster, Germany.
DFG Cluster of Excellence EXC 1003 'Cells in Motion', Muenster, Germany.

Michel Eisenblätter (M)

Institute of Clinical Radiology, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster, Germany.
Richard Dimbleby Department of Cancer Research, Randall Division & Division of Cancer Studies, King's College London, London, UK.

Moritz Wildgruber (M)

Institute of Clinical Radiology, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster, Germany. moritz.wildgruber@ukmuenster.de.
DFG Cluster of Excellence EXC 1003 'Cells in Motion', Muenster, Germany. moritz.wildgruber@ukmuenster.de.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH