Six-minute walk test is reliable and sensitive in detecting response to therapy in CIDP.
6MWT
CIDP
Fatigue
MCID
Journal
Journal of neurology
ISSN: 1432-1459
Titre abrégé: J Neurol
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 0423161
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Apr 2019
Apr 2019
Historique:
received:
30
11
2018
accepted:
18
01
2019
revised:
14
01
2019
pubmed:
6
2
2019
medline:
30
6
2019
entrez:
6
2
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The current clinical measures (ONLS, R-ODS, mRS, and MRC) may not be so sensitive in capturing minimal variations or measuring fatigue in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP). Our aim was to assess if 6-min walk test (6MWT) is able to increase the sensitivity in detecting response to therapy and to capture fatigue in CIDP patients. We tested 6MWT in 42 CIDP patients. Using both anchor-based and distribution-based approaches, we estimated the meaningful clinical change after therapy by calculating the minimum improvement cutoff (Minimal Clinically Important Difference Score-MCID) required for considering a patient as responder. We calculated the sensitivity of the 6MWT versus the other clinical outcomes. We analysed fatigue by comparing the velocities between first and sixth minutes of the 6MWT and the effect of treatment on fatigue using an ANOVA model for repeated measures. MCID resulted equal to 20 m. The combination of 6MWT-MCID cutoff with the other clinical measures led to identify 74% of responders. The sensitivity of the 6MWT was 90% versus 77% of the other clinical measures. The 6MWT was also sensitive in capturing fatigue-related changes, even though fatigue was not influenced by treatment. The combination of the 6MWT with the other clinical measures increased the chance to detect the quote of responders. We propose to include the 6MWT in the routine assessment of CIDP patients and the MCID cutoff at 20 m could be set for identifying the responders and properly guiding the therapy management.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30721354
doi: 10.1007/s00415-019-09207-1
pii: 10.1007/s00415-019-09207-1
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
860-865Références
Neurology. 2000 Feb 22;54(4):943-9
pubmed: 10690990
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002 Jul 1;166(1):111-7
pubmed: 12091180
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2006 Aug;77(8):973-6
pubmed: 16574730
Spine J. 2007 Sep-Oct;7(5):541-6
pubmed: 17448732
Muscle Nerve. 1991 Nov;14(11):1103-9
pubmed: 1745285
Mult Scler. 2008 Apr;14(3):383-90
pubmed: 17942508
Physiother Theory Pract. 2008 May-Jun;24(3):195-204
pubmed: 18569856
Neurology. 2010 Mar 9;74(10):833-8
pubmed: 20211907
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2010 Nov;81(11):1194-9
pubmed: 20647554
Muscle Nerve. 2010 Dec;42(6):966-74
pubmed: 21038378
J Peripher Nerv Syst. 2010 Sep;15(3):185-95
pubmed: 21040140
Neurology. 2011 Jan 25;76(4):337-45
pubmed: 21263135
Muscle Nerve. 2012 Jun;45(6):831-4
pubmed: 22581536
J Man Manip Ther. 2012 Aug;20(3):160-6
pubmed: 23904756
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2015 Jul;86(7):729-34
pubmed: 25246645
Control Clin Trials. 1989 Dec;10(4):407-15
pubmed: 2691207
Muscle Nerve. 2016 Nov;54(5):836-842
pubmed: 27015431
Eur J Neurol. 2016 Aug;23(8):1343-50
pubmed: 27160471
J Neurol. 2016 Jul;263(7):1434-41
pubmed: 27177999
Stroke. 1989 Jun;20(6):828
pubmed: 2728057
Muscle Nerve. 2017 Mar;55(3):333-337
pubmed: 27421252
Rev Neurol (Paris). 2016 Oct;172(10):620-626
pubmed: 27638135
Int J Rehabil Res. 2017 Mar;40(1):66-70
pubmed: 27977464
Muscle Nerve. 2017 Sep;56(3):413-420
pubmed: 27997686
Neuromuscul Disord. 2017 Oct;27(10):879-882
pubmed: 28803817
Int J MS Care. 2017 Sep-Oct;19(5):247-252
pubmed: 29070965