Cross-country comparisons of trends in adolescent psychosomatic symptoms - a Rasch analysis of HBSC data from four Nordic countries.
Adolescent
Adolescent Behavior
/ psychology
Child
Denmark
Female
Finland
Health Status Disparities
Humans
Male
Norway
Psychometrics
Psychophysiologic Disorders
/ diagnosis
Quality of Life
Scandinavian and Nordic Countries
/ epidemiology
Students
/ statistics & numerical data
Surveys and Questionnaires
Sweden
Symptom Assessment
Adolescents
Differential item functioning
HBSC
Psychosomatic symptoms
Rasch measurement theory
Trend analyses
Journal
Health and quality of life outcomes
ISSN: 1477-7525
Titre abrégé: Health Qual Life Outcomes
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101153626
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
06 Feb 2019
06 Feb 2019
Historique:
received:
27
02
2018
accepted:
24
01
2019
entrez:
8
2
2019
pubmed:
8
2
2019
medline:
19
3
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
To analyse the psychometric properties of the HBSC Symptom Checklist (HBSC-SCL) on psychosomatic symptoms with a focus on the operating characteristics of the items, and on the impacts of measurement distortions on the comparisons of person measures across time and between countries. Data were collected in 1993/94, 1997/98, 2001/02, 2005/06, 2008/09, 2013/14 in Denmark, Finland, Norway and Sweden as part of the Health Behaviour in School-aged Children (HBSC) study. Data comprised 116,531 students 11, 13 and 15 years old. Rasch analysis was conducted of the HBSC-SCL consisting of eight items with a focus on Differential Item Functioning (DIF) and item threshold ordering. The impacts of DIF and threshold disordering on trend analyses were analysed in a subsample consisting of 15 years old students. One item shows evidence of severe DIF and the categorisation of some items does not seem to work as intended. Analyses of changes based on proportions of psychosomatic symptoms show that bad item functioning affects some comparisons between countries across time: A four percentage point difference between 15 years old girls in Finland and Sweden concerning the rate of increase of psychosomatic symptoms from 1994 to 2014 disappears when the problems with DIF and disordered item thresholds are taken into account. Although the proportions of students with psychosomatic symptoms are clearly higher 2014 than 1994 in all four countries the shape of most trends is nonlinear. Some of the cross-country comparisons were distorted because of DIF and problems related to disordering of the item thresholds. The comparisons among girls between Finland and Sweden were affected by the problems pertaining to the original measure of psychosomatic symptoms, while the trend patterns among boys were not much affected. In addition to confirming increasing rates of adolescent mental health problems in the Nordic countries, the substantive analyses in the current study show that Finland is joining Sweden in having the sharpest increase among older adolescents, in particular among girls. To improve the functioning of the scale the DIF item could be removed or replaced and response categories collapsed in post hoc analyses.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
To analyse the psychometric properties of the HBSC Symptom Checklist (HBSC-SCL) on psychosomatic symptoms with a focus on the operating characteristics of the items, and on the impacts of measurement distortions on the comparisons of person measures across time and between countries.
METHODS
METHODS
Data were collected in 1993/94, 1997/98, 2001/02, 2005/06, 2008/09, 2013/14 in Denmark, Finland, Norway and Sweden as part of the Health Behaviour in School-aged Children (HBSC) study. Data comprised 116,531 students 11, 13 and 15 years old. Rasch analysis was conducted of the HBSC-SCL consisting of eight items with a focus on Differential Item Functioning (DIF) and item threshold ordering. The impacts of DIF and threshold disordering on trend analyses were analysed in a subsample consisting of 15 years old students.
RESULTS
RESULTS
One item shows evidence of severe DIF and the categorisation of some items does not seem to work as intended. Analyses of changes based on proportions of psychosomatic symptoms show that bad item functioning affects some comparisons between countries across time: A four percentage point difference between 15 years old girls in Finland and Sweden concerning the rate of increase of psychosomatic symptoms from 1994 to 2014 disappears when the problems with DIF and disordered item thresholds are taken into account. Although the proportions of students with psychosomatic symptoms are clearly higher 2014 than 1994 in all four countries the shape of most trends is nonlinear.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Some of the cross-country comparisons were distorted because of DIF and problems related to disordering of the item thresholds. The comparisons among girls between Finland and Sweden were affected by the problems pertaining to the original measure of psychosomatic symptoms, while the trend patterns among boys were not much affected. In addition to confirming increasing rates of adolescent mental health problems in the Nordic countries, the substantive analyses in the current study show that Finland is joining Sweden in having the sharpest increase among older adolescents, in particular among girls. To improve the functioning of the scale the DIF item could be removed or replaced and response categories collapsed in post hoc analyses.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30728023
doi: 10.1186/s12955-019-1097-x
pii: 10.1186/s12955-019-1097-x
pmc: PMC6366074
doi:
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
27Subventions
Organisme : Forskningsrådet om Hälsa, Arbetsliv och Välfärd
ID : 2012-1736
Références
Eur J Public Health. 2001 Mar;11(1):4-10
pubmed: 11276570
Scand J Public Health. 2002;30(3):223-30
pubmed: 12227979
Eur J Public Health. 2008 Jun;18(3):294-9
pubmed: 18252752
Int J Nurs Stud. 2009 Mar;46(3):380-93
pubmed: 19059593
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2014 Jul;48(7):606-16
pubmed: 24829198
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2015 Mar;56(3):370-93
pubmed: 25496340
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2015 Mar;56(3):394-6
pubmed: 25714743
Eur J Public Health. 2015 Apr;25 Suppl 2:24-7
pubmed: 25805782
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2017 Sep 19;15(1):181
pubmed: 28927468
PLoS One. 2017 Nov 28;12(11):e0188374
pubmed: 29182644
Educ Psychol Meas. 2015 Apr;75(2):185-207
pubmed: 29795818