Cross-sectional Evaluation of Home Enteral Nutrition Practice in the United States in the Context of the New Enteral Connectors.


Journal

JPEN. Journal of parenteral and enteral nutrition
ISSN: 1941-2444
Titre abrégé: JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7804134

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
11 2019
Historique:
received: 29 08 2018
accepted: 30 12 2018
pubmed: 8 2 2019
medline: 15 12 2020
entrez: 8 2 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The increased prevalence of home enteral nutrition (HEN), reemergence of blenderized tube feeding (BTF), and conversion of enteral connectors to the ISO 80369-3 standard are creating a significant need to better understand the practices of the HEN population. A cross-sectional survey of current HEN consumers was conducted to evaluate the demographics of HEN consumers, including formulas and feeding tubes being used. In order to disseminate the survey to a wide range of HEN consumers, we partnered with private infusion companies (Coram and Pediatric Home Services) along with the Oley and Tube Feeding Awareness Foundations. A validated survey focusing on patient demographics, tube types, formula used, and tube clogging complications was placed online from September 1, 2016, to October 15, 2016. During the study period, 1519 surveys were completed, with 1062 respondents in the pediatric group (<18 years old) and 457 in the adult group (≥18 years old). The most popular formulas were standard polymeric and specialized formulas in both the pediatric and adult groups. However, a significant number in the pediatric (31.2%) and adult (18.6%) groups used BTF either alone or in combination with other formulas. Clogging was also quite prevalent and correlated with tube size. The present study highlights the significant diversity of the HEN practice in terms of types and sizes of tubes as well as formulas used, including confirmation of the widespread use of BTF. These data are key to ensure HEN providers are able to appropriately support and educate their patients.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30729551
doi: 10.1002/jpen.1510
doi:

Types de publication

Evaluation Study Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1020-1027

Informations de copyright

© 2019 American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition.

Références

Cawsey SI, Soo J, Gramlich LM. Home enteral nutrition. Nutr Clin Practice. 2010;25(3):296-300.
Delegge MH. Home enteral nutrition. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2002;26(5 suppl):S4-S7.
Mundi MS, Pattinson A, McMahon MT, Davidson J, Hurt RT. Prevalence of home parenteral and enteral nutrition in the United States. Nutr Clin Practice. 2017. 32(6):799-805.
Bozzetti F, Braga M, Gianotti L, Gavazzi C, Mariani L. Postoperative enteral versus parenteral nutrition in malnourished patients with gastrointestinal cancer: a randomised multicentre trial. The Lancet. 2001;358(9292):1487-1492.
Heyland D, Dhaliwal R, Drover J, Gramlich L, Dodek P. Canadian clinical practice guidelines for nutrition support in mechanically ventilated, critically ill adult patients. J Parenteral Enteral Nutr. 2003;27(5):355-373.
Marik PE. Feeding critically ill patients the right ‘whey’: thinking outside of the box. A personal view. Ann Intensive Care. 2015;5(1):51.
Epp L, Lammert L, Vallumsetla N, Hurt RT, Mundi MS. Use of blenderized tube feeding in adult and pediatric home enteral nutrition patients. Nutr Clin Practice. 2016:32(2):201-205.
Hebuterne X, Bozzetti F, Moreno Villares JM, et al. Home enteral nutrition in adults: a European multicentre survey. Clin Nutr. 2003;22(3):261-266.
British Artificial Nutrition Survey. Annual BANS Report Artificial Nutrition Support in the UK 2005. 2005. http://www.bapen.org.uk/pdfs/bans_reports/bans_report_05.pdf. Accessed March 16, 2017.
Crosby J, Duerksen DR. A prospective study of tube- and feeding-related complications in patients receiving long-term home enteral nutrition. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2007;31(4):274-277.
Silver HJ, Wellman NS, Arnold DJ, Livingstone AS, Byers PM. Older adults receiving home enteral nutrition: enteral regimen, provider involvement, and health care outcomes. J Parenteral Enteral Nutr. 2004;28(2):92-98.
Ojo O. The challenges of home enteral tube feeding: a global perspective. Nutrients. 2015;7(4):2524-2538.
Hurt RT, Varayil JE, Epp LM, et al. Blenderized tube feeding use in adult home enteral nutrition patients a cross-sectional study. Nutr Clin Pract. 2015;30(6):824-829.
Johnson TW, Spurlock AL, Epp L, Hurt RT, Mundi MS. Reemergence of blended tube feeding and parent's reported experiences in their tube fed children. J Altern Complement Med. 2018;24(4):369-373.
Mundi MS, Duellman W, Epp L, Davidson J, Hurt RT. Comparison of gravity flow rates between ENFit and legacy feeding tubes. J Parenteral Enteral Nutr. 2017;42(3):522-528. https://doi.org/10.1177/0148607117703959
Mundi MS, Duellman W, Epp L, Davidson J, Hurt RT. Comparison of syringe compression force between ENFit and legacy feeding tubes. J Parenteral Enteral Nutr. 2019;43(1):107-117.
Hurt RT, Epp LM, Pattinson AK, Duellman WM, Corner SM, Mundi MS. Gravity flow in proposed enteral tube small-bore connectors. Nutr Clin Pract. 2017; 32(2):189-192.
Mundi MS, Epp L, Hurt RT. Increased force required with proposed standardized enteral feed connector in blenderized tube feeding. Nutr Clin Pract. 2016;31(6):795-798.
Howard L, Ament M, Fleming CR, Shike M, Steiger E. Current use and clinical outcome of home parenteral and enteral nutrition therapies in the United States. Gastroenterology. 1995;109(2):355-365.
Paccagnella A, Baruffi C, Pizzolato D, et al. Home enteral nutrition in adults: a five-year (2001-2005) epidemiological analysis. Clin Nutr. 2008;27(3):378-385.
Pedrón-Giner C, Navas-López VM, Martínez-Zazo AB, et al. Analysis of the Spanish national registry for pediatric home enteral nutrition (NEPAD): implementation rates and observed trends during the past 8 years. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2013;67(4):318-323.
Boullata JI, Carrera AL, Harvey L, et al. ASPEN safe practices for enteral nutrition therapy. J Parenteral Enteral Nutr. 2017;41(1):15-103.
Chen Y, Peterson SJ. Enteral nutrition formulas: which formula is right for your adult patient? Nutr Clin Practice. 2009;24(3):344-355.
Ireton-Jones C. Home enteral nutrition from the provider's perspective. J Parenteral Enteral Nutr. 26(5S):S8-S9.

Auteurs

Lisa M Epp (LM)

Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, Metabolism and Nutrition, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.

Bradley R Salonen (BR)

Division of General Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.

Ryan T Hurt (RT)

Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, Metabolism and Nutrition, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Division of General Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, University of Louisville, Kentucky, USA.

Manpreet S Mundi (MS)

Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, Metabolism and Nutrition, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH