On the estimation of population cause-specific mortality fractions from in-hospital deaths.
Bangladesh
Cause of death
Death certificate
Philippines
Vital registration
Journal
BMC medicine
ISSN: 1741-7015
Titre abrégé: BMC Med
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101190723
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
08 02 2019
08 02 2019
Historique:
received:
11
09
2018
accepted:
22
01
2019
entrez:
9
2
2019
pubmed:
9
2
2019
medline:
18
6
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Almost all countries without complete vital registration systems have data on deaths collected by hospitals. However, these data have not been widely used to estimate cause of death (COD) patterns in populations because only a non-representative fraction of people in these countries die in health facilities. Methods that can exploit hospital mortality statistics to reliably estimate community COD patterns are required to strengthen the evidence base for disease and injury control programs. We propose a method that weights hospital-certified causes by the probability of death to estimate population cause-specific mortality fractions (CSMFs). We used an established verbal autopsy instrument (VAI) to collect data from hospital catchment areas in Chandpur and Comilla Districts, Bangladesh, and Bohol province, the Philippines, between 2011 and 2014, along with demographic covariates for each death. Hospital medical certificates of cause of death (death certificates) were collected and mapped to the corresponding cause categories of the VAI. Tariff 2.0 was used to assign a COD for community deaths. Logistic regression models were created for broad causes in each country to calculate the probability of in-hospital death, given a set of covariate values. The reweighted CSMFs for deaths in the hospital catchment population, represented by each hospital death, were calculated from the corresponding regression models. We collected data on 4228 adult deaths in the Philippines and 3725 deaths in Bangladesh. Short time to hospital and education were consistently associated with in-hospital death in the Philippines and absence of a disability was consistently associated with in-hospital death in Bangladesh. Non-communicable diseases (excluding stroke) and stroke were the leading causes of death in both the Philippines (33.9%, 19.1%) and Bangladesh (46.1%, 21.1%) according to the reweighted method. The reweighted method generally estimated CSMFs that fell between those derived from hospitals and those diagnosed by Tariff 2.0. Statistical methods can be used to derive estimates of cause-specific probability of death in-hospital for Bangladesh and the Philippines to generate population CSMFs. In regions where hospital death certification is of reasonable quality and routine verbal autopsy is not applied, these estimates could be applied to generate cost-effective and robust CSMFs for the population.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Almost all countries without complete vital registration systems have data on deaths collected by hospitals. However, these data have not been widely used to estimate cause of death (COD) patterns in populations because only a non-representative fraction of people in these countries die in health facilities. Methods that can exploit hospital mortality statistics to reliably estimate community COD patterns are required to strengthen the evidence base for disease and injury control programs. We propose a method that weights hospital-certified causes by the probability of death to estimate population cause-specific mortality fractions (CSMFs).
METHODS
We used an established verbal autopsy instrument (VAI) to collect data from hospital catchment areas in Chandpur and Comilla Districts, Bangladesh, and Bohol province, the Philippines, between 2011 and 2014, along with demographic covariates for each death. Hospital medical certificates of cause of death (death certificates) were collected and mapped to the corresponding cause categories of the VAI. Tariff 2.0 was used to assign a COD for community deaths. Logistic regression models were created for broad causes in each country to calculate the probability of in-hospital death, given a set of covariate values. The reweighted CSMFs for deaths in the hospital catchment population, represented by each hospital death, were calculated from the corresponding regression models.
RESULTS
We collected data on 4228 adult deaths in the Philippines and 3725 deaths in Bangladesh. Short time to hospital and education were consistently associated with in-hospital death in the Philippines and absence of a disability was consistently associated with in-hospital death in Bangladesh. Non-communicable diseases (excluding stroke) and stroke were the leading causes of death in both the Philippines (33.9%, 19.1%) and Bangladesh (46.1%, 21.1%) according to the reweighted method. The reweighted method generally estimated CSMFs that fell between those derived from hospitals and those diagnosed by Tariff 2.0.
CONCLUSIONS
Statistical methods can be used to derive estimates of cause-specific probability of death in-hospital for Bangladesh and the Philippines to generate population CSMFs. In regions where hospital death certification is of reasonable quality and routine verbal autopsy is not applied, these estimates could be applied to generate cost-effective and robust CSMFs for the population.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30732593
doi: 10.1186/s12916-019-1267-z
pii: 10.1186/s12916-019-1267-z
pmc: PMC6367755
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
29Références
Trop Med Int Health. 2013 Oct;18(10):1231-9
pubmed: 23906285
Bull World Health Organ. 2014 Nov 1;92(11):807-16
pubmed: 25378742
Popul Health Metr. 2011 Aug 04;9:27
pubmed: 21816095
Health Inf Manag. 2013;42(3):20-8
pubmed: 24067238
Bull World Health Organ. 2006 Mar;84(3):164
pubmed: 16583068
Popul Health Metr. 2010 May 18;8:12
pubmed: 20482759
Bull World Health Organ. 2005 Mar;83(3):171-7
pubmed: 15798840
BMC Med. 2015 Dec 08;13:291
pubmed: 26644140
J Clin Epidemiol. 1996 Dec;49(12):1373-9
pubmed: 8970487
Lancet. 2007 Nov 10;370(9599):1653-63
pubmed: 18029006
PLoS Med. 2013;10(7):e1001477
pubmed: 23843748
PLoS Med. 2007 Nov 20;4(11):e326
pubmed: 18031195
Lancet. 2017 Sep 16;390(10100):1211-1259
pubmed: 28919117
BMC Med. 2018 Mar 1;16(1):32
pubmed: 29495961
Popul Health Metr. 2018 Jun 27;16(1):10
pubmed: 29945624
Popul Health Metr. 2011 Apr 17;9:9
pubmed: 21496336