Use of nalbuphine as a substitute for butorphanol in combination with dexmedetomidine and tiletamine/zolazepam: a randomized non-inferiority trial.


Journal

Journal of feline medicine and surgery
ISSN: 1532-2750
Titre abrégé: J Feline Med Surg
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100897329

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
02 2020
Historique:
pubmed: 9 2 2019
medline: 1 12 2020
entrez: 9 2 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The goal of this study was to determine whether a drug combination using nalbuphine with dexmedetomidine and tiletamine/zolazepam is non-inferior to one that uses butorphanol. All healthy cats presenting solely for gonadectomy to two trap-neuter-return mobile clinic days were randomly assigned to induction with a combination of tiletamine/zolazepam 3 mg/kg, dexmedetomidine 7.5 µg/kg and either butorphanol or nalbuphine at 0.15 mg/kg. All participants were blinded to the identity of the combinations. The primary endpoint was clinician satisfaction, comprised of the mean of four satisfaction ratings on a 7-point Likert scale (highly dissatisfied through to highly satisfied) recorded for induction, maintenance of anesthesia, surgery and recovery. Exploratory endpoints included each individual score, number of injections, duration of induction, duration of recovery and need for reversal agent. To assess non-inferiority for the primary endpoint and individual scores, the difference and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of the difference between the mean clinical scores for the nalbuphine and butorphanol-based combinations were calculated and compared with a prespecified non-inferiority margin of 20% (1.4 points). Seventy-two cats were enrolled, 36 in each group. The mean ± SD composite score for the combination with nalbuphine was 6.06 ± 0.59 (95% CI 5.86-6.25) points, while the combination with butorphanol was 6.22 ± 0.62 (95% CI 6.01-6.43). The difference between mean scores was 0.17 (-0.12 to 0.45), which did not exceed the prespecified boundary of 1.4, establishing the non-inferiority of nalbuphine. No individual clinical score for nalbuphine was inferior to butorphanol, and there were no significant differences for any secondary endpoints. The clinical experience of the nalbuphine-based combination was non-inferior to the butorphanol-based combination. Nalbuphine is an effective substitute for butorphanol, providing another option if butorphanol is unavailable due to shortage, controlled status or cost, without requiring a change in anesthetic workflow.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30735096
doi: 10.1177/1098612X19826715
doi:

Substances chimiques

Central Nervous System Depressants 0
Drug Combinations 0
tiletamine, zolazepam drug combination 0
Tiletamine 2YFC543249
Dexmedetomidine 67VB76HONO
Zolazepam G1R474U58U
Nalbuphine L2T84IQI2K

Types de publication

Journal Article Randomized Controlled Trial, Veterinary Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

100-107

Auteurs

Rachael E Kreisler (RE)

Department of Pathology and Population Medicine, Animal Health Institute, College of Veterinary Medicine, Midwestern University, Glendale, AZ, USA.

Heather N Cornell (HN)

Department of Pathology and Population Medicine, Animal Health Institute, College of Veterinary Medicine, Midwestern University, Glendale, AZ, USA.

Veronica A Smith (VA)

College of Veterinary Medicine, Midwestern University, Glendale, AZ, USA.

Samantha E Kelsey (SE)

College of Veterinary Medicine, Midwestern University, Glendale, AZ, USA.

Erik H Hofmeister (EH)

Department of Surgery, Animal Health Institute, College of Veterinary Medicine, Midwestern University, Glendale, AZ, USA.

Articles similaires

Robotic Surgical Procedures Animals Humans Telemedicine Models, Animal

Odour generalisation and detection dog training.

Lyn Caldicott, Thomas W Pike, Helen E Zulch et al.
1.00
Animals Odorants Dogs Generalization, Psychological Smell
Animals TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases Colorectal Neoplasms Colitis Mice
Animals Tail Swine Behavior, Animal Animal Husbandry

Classifications MeSH