A pre-absorber optimization technique for pencil beam scanning proton therapy treatments.
Pencil beam scanning
Planning method
Proton therapy
Range shifter
Journal
Physica medica : PM : an international journal devoted to the applications of physics to medicine and biology : official journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics (AIFB)
ISSN: 1724-191X
Titre abrégé: Phys Med
Pays: Italy
ID NLM: 9302888
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jan 2019
Jan 2019
Historique:
received:
17
04
2018
revised:
16
11
2018
accepted:
19
12
2018
entrez:
11
2
2019
pubmed:
11
2
2019
medline:
15
3
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To implement a new proton therapy planning method for the treatment of shallow lesions with PBS and to compare it to the standard method. In order to treat shallow lesions, a pre-absorber, usually called range-shifter (RS), is needed: it is used to degrade the beam energy and treat tumors shallower than the minimum range available. Its use is associated to dose calculation uncertainties and plan quality degradation which should be minimized. We studied five tumor localizations requiring RS and created three plans for each case: a) standard method with the RS close to the patient surface, b) with the RS used only for the shallow part of the tumor (when strictly needed) and completely retracted and c) as the b) approach but with the RS close to the patient. We called these two approaches 'Range Shifter Optimization' (RSO) techniques. We compared those plans in terms of dose distribution quality, delivery time and patient-specific-QA results. In most cases a good dose reduction to OARs with no significant loss in terms of target coverage was obtained when the RSO techniques were used. Patient-specific-QA gave very good results in terms of γ-Passing-Rate (PR) (3%, 3 mm) for both RSO techniques (mean 98.09%), while the standard had some very low PR (minimum 81.09%). The delivery time increased (5.0 min on average per treatment) but was still acceptable in terms of patient compliance. We developed a new planning technique for shallow lesions and we demonstrated its superiority in terms of both plan quality and patient-specific-QA results with respect to the standard method. This technique is routinely used to treat patients in our center.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30738518
pii: S1120-1797(18)31350-4
doi: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2018.12.014
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
145-152Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier Ltd.