Image quality and dose evaluation of MVCT TomoTherapy acquisitions: A phantom study.

Image guided radiotherapy Image quality Megavoltage computed tomography Pre-treatment imaging Tomotherapy

Journal

Physica medica : PM : an international journal devoted to the applications of physics to medicine and biology : official journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics (AIFB)
ISSN: 1724-191X
Titre abrégé: Phys Med
Pays: Italy
ID NLM: 9302888

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Jan 2019
Historique:
received: 29 10 2018
revised: 22 12 2018
accepted: 08 01 2019
entrez: 11 2 2019
pubmed: 11 2 2019
medline: 15 3 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The aim of this study is to evaluate the dose delivered and the image quality of pre-treatment MVCT images with Hi-Art TomoTherapy system, varying acquisition and reconstruction parameters. Catphan 500 MVCT images were acquired with all acquisition pitch and reconstruction intervals; image quality was evaluated in terms of noise, uniformity, contrast linearity, contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) and spatial resolution with the Modulation Transfer Function (MTF). Dose was evaluated as Multi Slice Average Dose (MSAD Differences in noise and uniformity, though statistically significant in some cases, were very small: noise ranged from 2.3% for Coarse - 3 mm to 2.4% for Coarse - 6 mm, while uniformity passed from 99.5% for Coarse - 6 mm to 99.8% for Normal - 4 mm. No differences at all were found for CNR for high and low density inserts, while MTF was higher for pitch Coarse, even if no differences in spatial resolution were observed visually (spatial resolution was up to 4 lp/cm for all combinations of pitch and reconstruction interval). Dose was dependent on pitch, being 1.0 cGy for Coarse, 1.5 cGy for Normal and 2.85 cGy for Fine. We observed negligible differences in image quality among different pitch and reconstruction interval, thus, considerations regarding pre-treatment imaging modalities should be based only on dose delivered and on the desired resolution along the cranio-caudal axis for image-guided radiotherapy and adaptive radiotherapy purposes.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
The aim of this study is to evaluate the dose delivered and the image quality of pre-treatment MVCT images with Hi-Art TomoTherapy system, varying acquisition and reconstruction parameters.
MATERIALS AND METHODS METHODS
Catphan 500 MVCT images were acquired with all acquisition pitch and reconstruction intervals; image quality was evaluated in terms of noise, uniformity, contrast linearity, contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) and spatial resolution with the Modulation Transfer Function (MTF). Dose was evaluated as Multi Slice Average Dose (MSAD
RESULTS RESULTS
Differences in noise and uniformity, though statistically significant in some cases, were very small: noise ranged from 2.3% for Coarse - 3 mm to 2.4% for Coarse - 6 mm, while uniformity passed from 99.5% for Coarse - 6 mm to 99.8% for Normal - 4 mm. No differences at all were found for CNR for high and low density inserts, while MTF was higher for pitch Coarse, even if no differences in spatial resolution were observed visually (spatial resolution was up to 4 lp/cm for all combinations of pitch and reconstruction interval). Dose was dependent on pitch, being 1.0 cGy for Coarse, 1.5 cGy for Normal and 2.85 cGy for Fine.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
We observed negligible differences in image quality among different pitch and reconstruction interval, thus, considerations regarding pre-treatment imaging modalities should be based only on dose delivered and on the desired resolution along the cranio-caudal axis for image-guided radiotherapy and adaptive radiotherapy purposes.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30738526
pii: S1120-1797(19)30009-2
doi: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2019.01.009
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

200-206

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2019 Associazione Italiana di Fisica Medica. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

P De Marco (P)

IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Unit of Medical Physics, Milan, Italy. Electronic address: paolo.demarco@ieo.it.

I Abdi Osman (I)

University of Milan, Milan, Italy.

F Castellini (F)

IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Department of Radiation Oncology, Milan, Italy.

R Ricotti (R)

IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Department of Radiation Oncology, Milan, Italy.

M C Leonardi (MC)

IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Department of Radiation Oncology, Milan, Italy.

E Miglietta (E)

IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Department of Radiation Oncology, Milan, Italy.

R Cambria (R)

IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Unit of Medical Physics, Milan, Italy.

D Origgi (D)

IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Unit of Medical Physics, Milan, Italy.

B A Jereczek-Fossa (BA)

IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Department of Radiation Oncology, Milan, Italy; University of Milan, Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, Milan, Italy.

C Garibaldi (C)

IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Radiation Research Unit, Milan, Italy.

F Cattani (F)

IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Unit of Medical Physics, Milan, Italy.

Articles similaires

Humans Magnetic Resonance Imaging Phantoms, Imaging Infant, Newborn Signal-To-Noise Ratio
Humans Shoulder Fractures Tomography, X-Ray Computed Neural Networks, Computer Female
Humans Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee Osteoarthritis, Knee Awards and Prizes Biomechanical Phenomena
Humans Range of Motion, Articular Arthroplasty, Replacement, Shoulder Posture Female

Classifications MeSH