Changes in species richness and composition of boreal waterbird communities: a comparison between two time periods 25 years apart.
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
11 02 2019
11 02 2019
Historique:
received:
08
06
2018
accepted:
21
12
2018
entrez:
12
2
2019
pubmed:
12
2
2019
medline:
25
8
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Global measures of biodiversity indicate consistent decline, but trends reported for local communities are more varied. Therefore, we need better understanding of mechanisms that drive changes in diversity of local communities and of differences in temporal trends between components of local diversity, such as species richness and species turnover rate. Freshwater ecosystems are vulnerable to multiple stressors, and severe impacts on their biodiversity have been documented. We studied species richness and composition of local boreal waterbird communities in 1990/1991 and 2016 at 58 lakes distributed over six regions in Finland and Sweden. The study lakes represented not only local trophic gradients but also a latitudinal gradient in the boreal biome. While species richness tended to be lower in 2016 than in 1990/1991, species turnover was relatively high. Within foraging guilds, local species richness of diving ducks and surface feeding waterbirds decreased, whereas that of large herbivores increased. The number of species gained in local communities was higher in lakes with rich vegetation than in lakes with sparse vegetation. Conservation of boreal freshwater ecosystems would benefit from recognizing that large-scale environmental changes can affect local diversity via processes operating at finer scales.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30741959
doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-38167-1
pii: 10.1038/s41598-018-38167-1
pmc: PMC6370776
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1725Références
Science. 2001 Apr 13;292(5515):281-4
pubmed: 11303102
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2005 Feb 28;360(1454):289-95
pubmed: 15814346
Science. 2005 Jul 22;309(5734):570-4
pubmed: 16040698
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2006 May;81(2):163-82
pubmed: 16336747
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1969 Sep;64(1):57-63
pubmed: 16591783
Environ Monit Assess. 2006 May;116(1-3):111-35
pubmed: 16779585
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2009 Feb;84(1):39-54
pubmed: 19032595
Trends Ecol Evol. 2009 Apr;24(4):201-7
pubmed: 19246117
Science. 2010 May 28;328(5982):1164-8
pubmed: 20430971
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2010 Jul 12;365(1549):2093-106
pubmed: 20513717
Science. 2010 Dec 10;330(6010):1496-501
pubmed: 20978282
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2010 Nov 27;365(1558):3593-7
pubmed: 20980308
Ambio. 2011 May;40(3):248-55
pubmed: 21644453
Trends Ecol Evol. 2013 Mar;28(3):167-77
pubmed: 23141923
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Nov 26;110(48):19456-9
pubmed: 24167259
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Nov 26;110(48):19187-8
pubmed: 24248347
Ecol Evol. 2014 Jan;4(1):91-103
pubmed: 24455164
Glob Chang Biol. 2014 Oct;20(10):2995-3003
pubmed: 24729475
Science. 2014 Apr 18;344(6181):266-7
pubmed: 24744366
Science. 2014 Apr 18;344(6181):296-9
pubmed: 24744374
Ecology. 2014 Jul;95(7):1717-23
pubmed: 25163105
Ecol Evol. 2014 Sep;4(18):3514-24
pubmed: 25478144
Trends Ecol Evol. 2015 Feb;30(2):104-13
pubmed: 25542312
Nature. 2015 Apr 2;520(7545):45-50
pubmed: 25832402
Science. 2016 Jan 29;351(6272):448-9
pubmed: 26823412
Ecol Evol. 2016 Mar 25;6(9):2938-47
pubmed: 27069589
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2017 Aug;92(3):1657-1674
pubmed: 27723232
Ecology. 2016 Aug;97(8):1949-1960
pubmed: 27859190
Ecology. 2017 Feb;98(2):583-590
pubmed: 27864922
PLoS One. 2017 Jan 3;12(1):e0169156
pubmed: 28045977
Oecologia. 1980 Jan;46(2):186-195
pubmed: 28309672