Association of Genetic and Clinical Aspects of Congenital Long QT Syndrome With Life-Threatening Arrhythmias in Japanese Patients.
Journal
JAMA cardiology
ISSN: 2380-6591
Titre abrégé: JAMA Cardiol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101676033
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 03 2019
01 03 2019
Historique:
pubmed:
14
2
2019
medline:
1
2
2020
entrez:
14
2
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Long QT syndrome (LQTS) is caused by several ion channel genes, yet risk of arrhythmic events is not determined solely by the responsible gene pathogenic variants. Female sex after adolescence is associated with a higher risk of arrhythmic events in individuals with congenital LQTS, but the association between sex and genotype-based risk of LQTS is still unclear. To examine the association between sex and location of the LQTS-related pathogenic variant as it pertains to the risk of life-threatening arrhythmias. This retrospective observational study enrolled 1124 genotype-positive patients from 11 Japanese institutions from March 1, 2006, to February 28, 2013. Patients had LQTS type 1 (LQT1), type 2 (LQT2), and type 3 (LQT3) (616 probands and 508 family members), with KCNQ1 (n = 521), KCNH2 (n = 487) and SCN5A (n = 116) genes. Clinical characteristics such as age at the time of diagnosis, sex, family history, cardiac events, and several electrocardiographic measures were collected. Statistical analysis was conducted from January 18 to October 10, 2018. Sex difference in the genotype-specific risk of congenital LQTS. Among the 1124 patients (663 females and 461 males; mean [SD] age, 20 [15] years) no sex difference was observed in risk for arrhythmic events among those younger than 15 years; in contrast, female sex was associated with a higher risk for LQT1 and LQT2 among those older than 15 years. In patients with LQT1, the pathogenic variant of the membrane-spanning site was associated with higher risk of arrhythmic events than was the pathogenic variant of the C-terminus of KCNQ1 (HR, 1.60; 95% CI, 1.19-2.17; P = .002), although this site-specific difference in the incidence of arrhythmic events was observed in female patients only. In patients with LQT2, those with S5-pore-S6 pathogenic variants in KCNH2 had a higher risk of arrhythmic events than did those with others (HR, 1.88; 95% CI, 1.44-2.44; P < .001). This site-specific difference in incidence, however, was observed in both sexes. Regardless of the QTc interval, however, female sex itself was associated with a significantly higher risk of arrhythmic events in patients with LQT2 after puberty (106 of 192 [55.2%] vs 19 of 94 [20.2%]; P < .001). In patients with LQT3, pathogenic variants in the S5-pore-S6 segment of the Nav1.5 channel were associated with lethal arrhythmic events compared with others (HR, 4.2; 95% CI, 2.09-8.36; P < .001), but no sex difference was seen. In this retrospective analysis, pathogenic variants in the pore areas of the channels were associated with higher risk of arrhythmic events than were other variants in each genotype, while sex-associated differences were observed in patients with LQT1 and LQT2 but not in those with LQT3. The findings of this study suggest that risk for cardiac events in LQTS varies according to genotype, variant site, age, and sex.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30758498
pii: 2724694
doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2018.4925
pmc: PMC6439560
doi:
Substances chimiques
ERG1 Potassium Channel
0
KCNH2 protein, human
0
KCNQ1 Potassium Channel
0
KCNQ1 protein, human
0
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Observational Study
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Retracted Publication
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
246-254Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Type : RetractionIn
Références
Circ J. 2013;77(12):2867-72
pubmed: 24200848
Circulation. 2007 May 15;115(19):2481-9
pubmed: 17470695
Circulation. 2012 Apr 24;125(16):1988-96
pubmed: 22456477
Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 2008 Jul;13(3):234-41
pubmed: 18713323
Circ J. 2016 Nov 25;80(12):2435-2442
pubmed: 27784853
Circulation. 2001 Jan 2;103(1):89-95
pubmed: 11136691
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009 Nov 24;54(22):2052-62
pubmed: 19926013
Circ Cardiovasc Genet. 2013 Aug;6(4):354-61
pubmed: 23856471
Circulation. 2016 Sep 20;134(12):872-82
pubmed: 27566755
N Engl J Med. 1998 Oct 1;339(14):960-5
pubmed: 9753711
Circulation. 1998 Jun 9;97(22):2237-44
pubmed: 9631873
Heart Rhythm. 2012 Jun;9(6):892-8
pubmed: 22293141
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003 Jul 2;42(1):103-9
pubmed: 12849668
Circ J. 2008 May;72(5):694-9
pubmed: 18441445
Heart Rhythm. 2011 Oct;8(10):1537-43
pubmed: 21440677
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2012 Aug 1;5(4):868-77
pubmed: 22895603
Eur Heart J. 2015 Nov 1;36(41):2793-2867
pubmed: 26320108
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016 Mar 8;67(9):1053-1058
pubmed: 26940925
N Engl J Med. 2003 May 8;348(19):1866-74
pubmed: 12736279
Heart Rhythm. 2005 May;2(5):507-17
pubmed: 15840476
J Hum Genet. 2016 Jan;61(1):51-5
pubmed: 26108145
Heart Rhythm. 2009 Sep;6(9):1297-303
pubmed: 19716085
Circ J. 2016;80(2):340-5
pubmed: 26632536