Real-life experience of lusutrombopag for cirrhotic patients with low platelet counts being prepared for invasive procedures.


Journal

PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2019
Historique:
received: 06 06 2018
accepted: 08 01 2019
entrez: 16 2 2019
pubmed: 16 2 2019
medline: 8 11 2019
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The present study aimed to report our real-life experience of the TPO receptor agonist lusutrombopag for cirrhotic patients with low platelet counts. We studied platelet counts in 1,760 cirrhotic patients undergoing invasive procedures at our hospital between January 2014 and December 2017. In addition, we studied 25 patients who were administered lusutrombopag before invasive procedures between June 2017 and January 2018. Effectiveness of lusutrombopag to raise platelet counts and to avoid transfusion and treatment-related adverse events were analyzed. In 1,760 cirrhotic patients without lusutrombopag prior to invasive procedures, proportion of patients whose platelet counts <50,000/μL and needed platelet transfusions were 66% (n = 27/41) for radiofrequency ablation, 43% (n = 21/49) for transarterial chemoembolization, and 55% (n = 21/38) for endoscopic injection sclerotherapy / endoscopic variceal ligation, respectively. In 25 cirrhotic patients treated by lusutrombopag prior to the invasive procedures, platelet counts significantly increased compared with baseline (82,000 ± 26,000 vs. 41,000 ± 11,000/μL) (p < 0.01). Out of 25 patients, only 4 patients (16%) needed platelet transfusion before the invasive procedures. The proportion of patients with low platelet count and who needed platelet transfusions was significantly low in patients treated with lusutrombopag compared to those not treated with lusutrombopag (16% (4/25) vs. 54% (69/128), p = 0.001). Platelet counts after lusutrombopag treatment and prior to invasive procedures were lower in patients with a baseline platelet count ≤30,000/μL (n = 8) compared with those with a baseline platelet count >30,000/μL (n = 17) (50,000 ± 20,000 vs 86,000 ± 26,000/μL, p = 0.002). Patients with a baseline platelet count ≤30,000/μL with spleen index (calculated by multiplying the transverse diameter by the vertical diameter measured by ultrasonography) ≥40 cm2 (n = 3) had a lower response rate to lusutrombopag compared to those with spleen index <40 cm2 (n = 5) (0% vs. 100%, p = 0.02). Hemorrhagic complication was not observed. Recurrence of portal thrombosis was observed and thrombolysis therapy was required in one patient who had prior history of thrombosis. Lusutrombopag is an effective and safe drug for thrombocytopenia in cirrhotic patients, and can reduce the frequency of platelet transfusions.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND AND AIMS
The present study aimed to report our real-life experience of the TPO receptor agonist lusutrombopag for cirrhotic patients with low platelet counts.
METHODS
We studied platelet counts in 1,760 cirrhotic patients undergoing invasive procedures at our hospital between January 2014 and December 2017. In addition, we studied 25 patients who were administered lusutrombopag before invasive procedures between June 2017 and January 2018. Effectiveness of lusutrombopag to raise platelet counts and to avoid transfusion and treatment-related adverse events were analyzed.
RESULTS
In 1,760 cirrhotic patients without lusutrombopag prior to invasive procedures, proportion of patients whose platelet counts <50,000/μL and needed platelet transfusions were 66% (n = 27/41) for radiofrequency ablation, 43% (n = 21/49) for transarterial chemoembolization, and 55% (n = 21/38) for endoscopic injection sclerotherapy / endoscopic variceal ligation, respectively. In 25 cirrhotic patients treated by lusutrombopag prior to the invasive procedures, platelet counts significantly increased compared with baseline (82,000 ± 26,000 vs. 41,000 ± 11,000/μL) (p < 0.01). Out of 25 patients, only 4 patients (16%) needed platelet transfusion before the invasive procedures. The proportion of patients with low platelet count and who needed platelet transfusions was significantly low in patients treated with lusutrombopag compared to those not treated with lusutrombopag (16% (4/25) vs. 54% (69/128), p = 0.001). Platelet counts after lusutrombopag treatment and prior to invasive procedures were lower in patients with a baseline platelet count ≤30,000/μL (n = 8) compared with those with a baseline platelet count >30,000/μL (n = 17) (50,000 ± 20,000 vs 86,000 ± 26,000/μL, p = 0.002). Patients with a baseline platelet count ≤30,000/μL with spleen index (calculated by multiplying the transverse diameter by the vertical diameter measured by ultrasonography) ≥40 cm2 (n = 3) had a lower response rate to lusutrombopag compared to those with spleen index <40 cm2 (n = 5) (0% vs. 100%, p = 0.02). Hemorrhagic complication was not observed. Recurrence of portal thrombosis was observed and thrombolysis therapy was required in one patient who had prior history of thrombosis.
CONCLUSIONS
Lusutrombopag is an effective and safe drug for thrombocytopenia in cirrhotic patients, and can reduce the frequency of platelet transfusions.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30768601
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0211122
pii: PONE-D-18-17032
pmc: PMC6377090
doi:

Substances chimiques

Cinnamates 0
Receptors, Thrombopoietin 0
Thiazoles 0
MPL protein, human 143641-95-6
lusutrombopag 6LL5JFU42F

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e0211122

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

This study was supported by a grant from the Japan Agency of Medical Research and Development (grant number: 15fk0210007h0002, URL: http://www.amed.go.jp/en/). Additionally, NI received lecture fees from SHIONOGI & CO., LTD. This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials. There are no patents, products in development, or marketed products to declare.

Références

Am Surg. 1995 Jul;61(7):603-6
pubmed: 7793741
J Hepatol. 2014 Dec;61(6):1253-9
pubmed: 25048952
Clin Sci (Lond). 2000 Sep;99(3):207-14
pubmed: 11787473
Mayo Clin Proc. 2016 Mar;91(3):329-35
pubmed: 26837481
Clin Infect Dis. 2004 Sep 15;39(6):790-6
pubmed: 15472809
Cancer. 2003 Jun 15;97(12):3099-106
pubmed: 12784347
N Engl J Med. 2012 Nov 22;367(21):2055-6
pubmed: 23171114
Clin J Gastroenterol. 2017 Jun;10(3):261-264
pubmed: 28324272
Hepatology. 1998 Nov;28(5):1424-9
pubmed: 9794931
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010 Oct;8(10):899-902; quiz e109
pubmed: 20601131
J Clin Oncol. 2018 Jan 20;36(3):283-299
pubmed: 29182495
Lancet. 2009 May 2;373(9674):1562-9
pubmed: 19324405
Hepatology. 2006 Jul;44(1):53-61
pubmed: 16799972
J Clin Gastroenterol. 2002 Jan;34(1):81-5
pubmed: 11743252
Am J Clin Pathol. 1990 Dec;94(6):747-53
pubmed: 2123077
J Clin Oncol. 2003 Aug 15;21(16):3158-67
pubmed: 12915607
Dig Liver Dis. 2003 Jul;35(7):473-8
pubmed: 12870732
Drugs. 2016 Jan;76(1):155-8
pubmed: 26666417
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2006 Apr 15;23(8):1055-65
pubmed: 16611265
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 1989 Oct;13(5):706-20
pubmed: 2688472
J Hepatol. 2008 Jun;48(6):1000-7
pubmed: 18433919
Bone Marrow Transplant. 2013 Mar;48(3):452-8
pubmed: 23208313
Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2017 Aug 1;328:54-59
pubmed: 28527913
Blood. 2009 Oct 29;114(18):3748-56
pubmed: 19671919

Auteurs

Hitomi Takada (H)

Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Musashino Red Cross Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
First Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Yamanashi, Yamanashi, Japan.

Masayuki Kurosaki (M)

Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Musashino Red Cross Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.

Hiroyuki Nakanishi (H)

Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Musashino Red Cross Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.

Yuka Takahashi (Y)

Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Musashino Red Cross Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.

Jun Itakura (J)

Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Musashino Red Cross Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.

Kaoru Tsuchiya (K)

Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Musashino Red Cross Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.

Yutaka Yasui (Y)

Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Musashino Red Cross Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.

Nobuharu Tamaki (N)

Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Musashino Red Cross Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.

Kenta Takaura (K)

Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Musashino Red Cross Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.

Yasuyuki Komiyama (Y)

Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Musashino Red Cross Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
First Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Yamanashi, Yamanashi, Japan.

Mayu Higuchi (M)

Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Musashino Red Cross Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.

Youhei Kubota (Y)

Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Musashino Red Cross Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.

Wann Wang (W)

Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Musashino Red Cross Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.

Mao Okada (M)

Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Musashino Red Cross Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.

Takao Shimizu (T)

Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Musashino Red Cross Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.

Keiya Watakabe (K)

Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Musashino Red Cross Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.

Nobuyuki Enomoto (N)

First Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Yamanashi, Yamanashi, Japan.

Namiki Izumi (N)

Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Musashino Red Cross Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH