Proteomic Analysis of the Effect of Inorganic and Organic Chemicals on Silver Nanoparticles in Wheat.
Energy Metabolism
/ drug effects
Germination
/ drug effects
Glycolysis
/ drug effects
Inorganic Chemicals
/ chemistry
Metal Nanoparticles
/ administration & dosage
Organic Chemicals
/ chemistry
Photosynthesis
/ drug effects
Plant Shoots
/ drug effects
Proteome
/ genetics
Proteomics
Triticum
/ drug effects
proteomics
silver nanoparticles
wheat
Journal
International journal of molecular sciences
ISSN: 1422-0067
Titre abrégé: Int J Mol Sci
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101092791
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
14 Feb 2019
14 Feb 2019
Historique:
received:
16
12
2018
revised:
04
02
2019
accepted:
07
02
2019
entrez:
17
2
2019
pubmed:
17
2
2019
medline:
5
6
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Production and utilization of nanoparticles (NPs) are increasing due to their positive and stimulating effects on biological systems. Silver (Ag) NPs improve seed germination, photosynthetic efficiency, plant growth, and antimicrobial activities. In this study, the effects of chemo-blended Ag NPs on wheat were investigated using the gel-free/label-free proteomic technique. Morphological analysis revealed that chemo-blended Ag NPs resulted in the increase of shoot length, shoot fresh weight, root length, and root fresh weight. Proteomic analysis indicated that proteins related to photosynthesis and protein synthesis were increased, while glycolysis, signaling, and cell wall related proteins were decreased. Proteins related to redox and mitochondrial electron transport chain were also decreased. Glycolysis associated proteins such as glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase increased as well as decreased, while phosphoenol pyruvate carboxylase was decreased. Antioxidant enzyme activities such as superoxide dismutase, catalase, and peroxidase were promoted in response to the chemo-blended Ag NPs. These results suggested that chemo-blended Ag NPs promoted plant growth and development through regulation of energy metabolism by suppression of glycolysis. Number of grains/spike, 100-grains weight, and yield of wheat were stimulated with chemo-blended Ag NPs. Morphological study of next generational wheat plants depicted normal growth, and no toxic effects were observed. Therefore, morphological, proteomic, yield, and next generation results revealed that chemo-blended Ag NPs may promote plant growth and development through alteration in plant metabolism.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30769865
pii: ijms20040825
doi: 10.3390/ijms20040825
pmc: PMC6412406
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Inorganic Chemicals
0
Organic Chemicals
0
Proteome
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Références
Nucleic Acids Res. 2000 Jan 1;28(1):27-30
pubmed: 10592173
Cancer Res. 2000 Jul 15;60(14):3927-39
pubmed: 10919671
Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol. 1996 Jun;47:185-214
pubmed: 15012287
Plant Physiol. 2005 Jul;138(3):1195-204
pubmed: 16009995
Plant Mol Biol. 2005 May;58(1):27-40
pubmed: 16028114
Science. 2006 Feb 3;311(5761):622-7
pubmed: 16456071
J Exp Bot. 2006;57(8):1603-20
pubmed: 16714307
J Environ Monit. 2008 Jun;10(6):713-7
pubmed: 18528537
Plant Cell Environ. 2009 Sep;32(9):1211-29
pubmed: 19389052
Plant Cell Environ. 2010 Apr;33(4):453-67
pubmed: 19712065
Environ Sci Technol. 2009 Dec 15;43(24):9473-9
pubmed: 19924897
Plant Physiol. 2010 Aug;153(4):1878-94
pubmed: 20516338
Environ Toxicol. 2012 Jan;27(1):42-9
pubmed: 20549639
Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2012 Aug;167(8):2225-33
pubmed: 22692847
J Proteomics. 2012 Dec 21;77:531-60
pubmed: 23041469
Int J Mol Sci. 2013 Feb 27;14(3):4734-61
pubmed: 23446868
Int J Mol Sci. 2013 Apr 02;14(4):7370-90
pubmed: 23549270
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2013 Jul;93:60-7
pubmed: 23651654
Metallomics. 2013 Jun;5(6):753-9
pubmed: 23689668
J Proteome Res. 2013 Nov 1;12(11):4769-84
pubmed: 23808807
PLoS One. 2013 Jul 18;8(7):e68752
pubmed: 23874747
J Agric Food Chem. 2013 Dec 11;61(49):11945-51
pubmed: 24245665
Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2013 Dec;12(12):931-47
pubmed: 24287781
Environ Sci Technol. 2014 Apr 15;48(8):4226-46
pubmed: 24617739
Environ Toxicol Chem. 2014 Jun;33(6):1398-405
pubmed: 24619507
J Plant Physiol. 2014 Aug 15;171(13):1142-8
pubmed: 24973586
Plant Physiol Biochem. 2014 Oct;83:57-64
pubmed: 25090087
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2014 Oct;108:335-9
pubmed: 25124680
J Proteomics. 2015 Jun 3;122:100-18
pubmed: 25857275
Science. 2015 Oct 9;350(6257):1242477
pubmed: 26450215
J Proteomics. 2016 Jun 30;143:136-150
pubmed: 27079982
Trends Plant Sci. 2016 Aug;21(8):699-712
pubmed: 27130471
Plant Physiol Biochem. 2017 Jan;110:210-225
pubmed: 27137632
Front Plant Sci. 2016 Apr 27;7:513
pubmed: 27200003
Plant Physiol Biochem. 2016 Oct;107:147-163
pubmed: 27288991
Nat Methods. 2016 Sep;13(9):731-40
pubmed: 27348712
Plant Physiol Biochem. 2017 Jan;110:167-177
pubmed: 27449300
J Proteomics. 2016 Oct 4;148:113-25
pubmed: 27469891
Biochim Biophys Acta. 2016 Nov;1864(11):1586-98
pubmed: 27530299
Plant Physiol Biochem. 2017 Jan;110:118-127
pubmed: 27622847
Biochim Biophys Acta Proteins Proteom. 2017 Jan;1865(1):28-42
pubmed: 27717896
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2017 Mar;137:18-28
pubmed: 27894021
IET Nanobiotechnol. 2017 Apr;11(3):277-285
pubmed: 28476985
Plant Physiol Biochem. 2017 Sep;118:551-560
pubmed: 28780454
Sci Rep. 2017 Aug 15;7(1):8263
pubmed: 28811584
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2018 Jan;147:715-719
pubmed: 28942273
Front Plant Sci. 2017 Oct 12;8:1501
pubmed: 29075270
Front Chem. 2017 Oct 12;5:78
pubmed: 29075626
Dose Response. 2017 Dec 04;15(4):1559325817744945
pubmed: 29238274
J Hazard Mater. 2018 Mar 15;346:62-72
pubmed: 29247955
J Proteomics. 2018 Jun 15;181:238-248
pubmed: 29704570
Chemosphere. 2018 Nov;211:573-583
pubmed: 30092538
Anal Biochem. 1971 Nov;44(1):276-87
pubmed: 4943714
Anal Biochem. 1976 May 7;72:248-54
pubmed: 942051