Checkpoint Kinase 1 Inhibition Enhances Cisplatin Cytotoxicity and Overcomes Cisplatin Resistance in SCLC by Promoting Mitotic Cell Death.
Animals
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols
/ pharmacology
Cell Death
/ drug effects
Cell Line, Tumor
Checkpoint Kinase 1
/ antagonists & inhibitors
Cisplatin
/ administration & dosage
Drug Synergism
Female
Humans
Lung Neoplasms
/ drug therapy
Mice
Mice, Nude
Mitosis
/ drug effects
Protein Kinase Inhibitors
/ administration & dosage
Random Allocation
Small Cell Lung Carcinoma
/ drug therapy
Xenograft Model Antitumor Assays
Caspase 2
Checkpoint kinase 1
Cisplatin
E2F transcription factor 1
SCLC
Journal
Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer
ISSN: 1556-1380
Titre abrégé: J Thorac Oncol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101274235
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
06 2019
06 2019
Historique:
received:
18
08
2018
revised:
28
11
2018
accepted:
27
01
2019
pubmed:
17
2
2019
medline:
22
7
2020
entrez:
17
2
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Platinum-based chemotherapy remains the standard treatment for patients with SCLC, but the benefit of the treatment is often hampered by rapid development of drug resistance. Thus far, there is no targeted therapy available for SCLC. More than 90% of SCLC tumors harbor mutations in the tumor suppressor gene tumor protein p53 (p53), an important DNA damage checkpoint regulator, and these tumor cells rely predominantly on the checkpoint kinases to control DNA damage response. We examined whether and how inhibition of checkpoint kinase 1 (Chk1) affects cisplatin cytotoxicity in SCLC cells with and without p53 mutations, and evaluated the effect of Chk1 inhibitor and cisplatin combination in cisplatin-sensitive and -resistant preclinical models. Inhibition of Chk1 synergized with cisplatin to induce mitotic cell death in the p53-deficeint SCLC cells. The effect was regulated in part through activation of caspase 2 and downregulation of E2F transcription factor 1 (E2F1). Furthermore, Chk1 inhibitors prexasertib and AZD7762 enhanced cisplatin antitumor activity and overcame cisplatin resistance in SCLC preclinical models in vitro an in vivo. We also observed that higher expression of Chk1 was associated with poorer overall survival of patients with SCLC. Our data account Chk1 as a potential therapeutic target in SCLC, and rationalize clinical development of Chk1 inhibitor and cisplatin combinational strategy for the treatment of SCLC.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30771522
pii: S1556-0864(19)30108-X
doi: 10.1016/j.jtho.2019.01.028
pmc: PMC6534433
mid: NIHMS1521590
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Protein Kinase Inhibitors
0
CHEK1 protein, human
EC 2.7.11.1
Checkpoint Kinase 1
EC 2.7.11.1
Cisplatin
Q20Q21Q62J
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1032-1045Subventions
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : P30 CA051008
Pays : United States
Commentaires et corrections
Type : ErratumIn
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2019 International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer. All rights reserved.
Références
J Clin Oncol. 2017 Dec 1;35(34):3823-3829
pubmed: 28813164
Cancer Cell. 2014 Dec 8;26(6):909-922
pubmed: 25490451
Nat Genet. 2012 Oct;44(10):1111-6
pubmed: 22941189
Mol Cancer. 2014 Apr 17;13:84
pubmed: 24742333
J Natl Cancer Inst. 1996 Jul 17;88(14):956-65
pubmed: 8667426
Nat Rev Cancer. 2007 Jul;7(7):495-507
pubmed: 17568790
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Sep 14;107(37):16090-5
pubmed: 20805465
Cancer Res. 2014 Dec 15;74(24):7534-45
pubmed: 25336189
J Thorac Oncol. 2016 Aug;11(8):1345-1356
pubmed: 27117832
Invest New Drugs. 2014 Oct;32(5):955-68
pubmed: 24942404
Oncogene. 2005 May 26;24(23):3786-96
pubmed: 15782134
Trends Mol Med. 2013 Feb;19(2):89-98
pubmed: 23219173
Annu Rev Biochem. 2004;73:39-85
pubmed: 15189136
Lancet Oncol. 2017 Jan;18(1):42-51
pubmed: 27932068
Cancer Res. 2017 Jul 15;77(14):3870-3884
pubmed: 28490518
Cell Rep. 2016 Jan 12;14(2):298-309
pubmed: 26748709
Mol Cancer Ther. 2012 Aug;11(8):1781-8
pubmed: 22653969
Genes Dev. 2015 Jul 15;29(14):1447-62
pubmed: 26220992
Int J Oncol. 2012 Jan;40(1):194-202
pubmed: 21894433
Cancer Discov. 2012 Sep;2(9):798-811
pubmed: 22961666
Cell Growth Differ. 1999 Mar;10(3):141-6
pubmed: 10099827
Nat Cell Biol. 2002 Nov;4(11):859-64
pubmed: 12389032
PLoS One. 2012;7(12):e52810
pubmed: 23285190
Cancer Res. 1997 Sep 15;57(18):4029-35
pubmed: 9307289
BMC Cancer. 2014 Aug 07;14:570
pubmed: 25104095
Mol Cell. 2012 Sep 14;47(5):681-93
pubmed: 22854598
Mol Cancer Ther. 2008 Feb;7(2):252-62
pubmed: 18281511
Int J Oncol. 1999 Jan;14(1):5-14
pubmed: 9863003
Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2013 Jun 01;5(6):
pubmed: 23732469
Cell. 2013 Nov 21;155(5):1088-103
pubmed: 24267891
Genes Dev. 2000 Jun 15;14(12):1448-59
pubmed: 10859164
Oncogene. 2015 Apr 9;34(15):1877-82
pubmed: 24882576
Invest New Drugs. 2014 Apr;32(2):213-26
pubmed: 24114124
Oncogene. 2001 Mar 29;20(14):1678-87
pubmed: 11313916
Nat Rev Cancer. 2009 Oct;9(10):738-48
pubmed: 19776743
J Clin Oncol. 2015 Dec 1;33(34):4106-11
pubmed: 26351333
J Biol Chem. 2004 Mar 5;279(10):8627-34
pubmed: 14684737
Cell Death Differ. 2006 Feb;13(2):260-72
pubmed: 16052233
Cell. 2008 May 30;133(5):864-77
pubmed: 18510930
BMC Cancer. 2014 Apr 22;14:276
pubmed: 24755270
Cell Cycle. 2007 Jan 1;6(1):104-10
pubmed: 17245119
Nat Genet. 2012 Oct;44(10):1104-10
pubmed: 22941188
Ann Oncol. 2017 Oct 1;28(10):2559-2566
pubmed: 28961837
BMC Cancer. 2014 Dec 03;14:904
pubmed: 25466554
Int J Cancer. 2008 Oct 1;123(7):1721-5
pubmed: 18649360
Cancer Res. 2010 Jun 15;70(12):4972-81
pubmed: 20501833
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Jan 25;102(4):1065-70
pubmed: 15650047
Lung Cancer. 2013 Dec;82(3):477-84
pubmed: 24113549
Nature. 2015 Aug 6;524(7563):47-53
pubmed: 26168399
Mol Cell. 2015 Sep 17;59(6):1011-24
pubmed: 26365377
N Engl J Med. 2018 Dec 6;379(23):2220-2229
pubmed: 30280641
Nat Chem Biol. 2011 Apr 13;7(7):428-30
pubmed: 21490603
Nat Cell Biol. 2005 Feb;7(2):195-201
pubmed: 15665856
J Thorac Oncol. 2018 Feb;13(2):237-245
pubmed: 29101056
J Cell Biol. 1998 Mar 23;140(6):1285-95
pubmed: 9508763